Enhanced magnetic quantum oscillations in the mixed state of a two-dimensional organic superconductor

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 67, Issue 6, 2003, Pages

  Wosnitza, J ^a   Hagel, J ^a,b   Meeson, P J ^c   Bintley, D ^c   Schlueter, J A ^d   Mohtasham, J ^e   Winter, R W ^e   Gard, G L ^e  

^a DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b GRENOBLE HIGH MAGNETIC FIELD LABORATORY   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^d ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^e PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CONDUCTANCE; CONDUCTOR; LOW TEMPERATURE; MAGNETISM; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; OSCILLATION; QUANTUM THEORY; THEORY; TORQUE;

EID: 7244245095     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.67.060504     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. T J B.M. Janssen, Phys. Rev. B57, 11 698 (1998).
2. J. Wosnitza, Phys. Rev. B62, R11 973 (2000).
3. K. Yasui and T. Kita, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.70, 2852 (2001).
4. D. Shoenberg, Magnetic Oscillations in Metals (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1984).
5. S. Wanka, Phys. Rev. B57, 3084 (1998). This specific-heat data led to the bulk (formula presented) The diamagnetic onset is at 5.2 K (Ref. 6).
6. U. Geiser, J. Am. Chem. Soc.118, 9996 (1996).
7. J. Wosnitza, Phys. Rev. B61, 7383 (2000);
8. J. Hagel, Synth. Met.120, 813 (2001).
9. A G. Swanson, Solid State Commun.73, 353 (1990);
10. T. Sasaki, Phys. Rev. B57, 10 889 (1998).
11. M M. Mola, Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 2130 (2001);
12. M M. Mola, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B15, 3353 (2001).
13. L. Legrand, Physica C211, 239 (1993).
14. This kind of analysis is not crucial. Other algorithms yield very similar field dependences of the dHvA amplitudes.
15. The SdH amplitudes (formula presented) are obtained by reanalyzing the SdH signal of sample A in Ref. 2.
16. Strictly speaking, for the determination of (formula presented) the band mass (formula presented) should be used. For simplicity, we used (formula presented) as done by most researchers.
17. N J. Clayton, Phys. Rev. B65, 064515 (2002).
18. H. Elsinger, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 6098 (2000);
19. J. Müller, Phys. Rev. B65, 140509 (2002).
20. V P. Mineev, Physica B259-261, 1072 (1999);
21. T. Champel and V P. Mineev, Philos. Mag. B81, 55 (2001).
22. A possible change of the g factor would also not explain the observation, since for the present material the spin-splitting factor is almost maximal at (formula presented)
23. K. Krishana, Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 3529 (1995) and references therein.
24. M. Dressel, Phys. Rev. B50, 13 603 (1994).
25. S. Belin, Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 4728 (1998);
26. J. Wosnitza et al., Synth. Met. (to be published).
27. T. Maniv, Phys. Rev. B46, 8360 (1992).