Convex necessary and sufficient conditions for frequency domain model (in)validation under SLTV structured uncertainty

IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control

Volumn 49, Issue 10, 2004, Pages 1683-1692

  Mazzaro, María Cecilia ^a   Sznaier, Mario ^a  

^a The Pennsylvania State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISCRETE TIME CONTROL SYSTEMS; FREQUENCY DOMAIN ANALYSIS; LINEAR CONTROL SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; UNCERTAIN SYSTEMS;

LINEAR MATRIX INEQUALITY; MODEL VALIDATION; STRUCTURED SLOWLY LINEAR TIME VARYING UNCERTAINTY;

TIME VARYING CONTROL SYSTEMS;

EID: 7244238982     PISSN: 00189286     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TAC.2004.835387     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. J. Chen, "Frequency-domain tests for validation of linear fractional uncertain models," IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. 42, pp. 748-760, June 1997.
2. J. Chen and S. Wang, "Validation of linear fractional uncertain models: solutions via matrix inequalities," IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. 41, pp. 844-849, June 1996.
3. M. A. Dahleh and M. Khammash, "Controller design for plants with structured uncertainty," Automatica, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 37-56, Jan. 1993.
4. A. L. Fradkoff and V. A. Yakubovich, "The S-procedure and duality theorems for nonconvex problems of quadratic programming," Vestnik Leningradskogo Universiteta, vol. 1, pp. 81-87, 1973.
5. G. Meinsma, Y. Shrivastava, and M. Fu, "A dual formulation of mixed μ and on the losslessness of (d, g) scaling," IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. 42, pp. 1032-1036, July 1997.
6. M. P. Newlin and R. S. Smith, "A generalization of the structured singular value and its application to model validation," IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. 43, pp. 901-907, July 1998.
7. F. Paganini, "Sets and constraints in the analysis of uncertain systems," Ph.D. dissertation, California Inst. Technol., Pasadena, CA, 1996.
8. K. Poolla, P. Khargonekar, A. Tikku, J. Krause, and K. Nagpal, "A time domain approach to model validation," IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. 39, pp. 951-959, May 1994.
9. K. Poolla and A. Tikku, "Robust performance against time-varying structured perturbations," IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. 40, pp. 1589-1602, Sept. 1995.
10. S. Rangan and K. Poolla, "Model validation for structured uncertainty models," in Proc. 1998 Amer. Control Conf., Philadelphia, PA, June 1998, pp. 629-633.
11. J. S. Shamma, "Robust stability with time-varying structured uncertainty," IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. 39, pp. 714-724, Apr. 1994.
12. R. Smith and J. Doyle, "Model validation: A connection between robust control and identification," IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. 37, pp. 942-952, July 1992.
13. 2 performance analysis," Automatica, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 957-966, June 2002.
14. O. Toker and J. Chen, "Time domain validation of structured uncertainty model sets," in Proc. 35th IEEE Conf. Decision and Control, Kobe, Japan, Dec. 1996, pp. 255-260.
15. D. Xu, Z. Ren, G. Gu, and J. Chen, "LFT uncertain model validation with time and frequency-domain measurements," IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. 44, pp. 1435-1441, July 1999.
16. N. Young, An Introduction to Hilbert Space. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press. 1988.