Developmental variability during early embryonic development of zebra fish, Danio rerio

Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution

Volumn 302, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 446-457

  Schmidt, Kai ^a   Starck, J Matthias ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ANIMAL EMBRYO; ARTICLE; BIOMETRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CYTOLOGY; EVOLUTION; EYE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; HISTOLOGY; MORPHOGENESIS; MORPHOMETRICS; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY; PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SOMITE; TIME; ZEBRA FISH;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; BIOMETRY; BODY WEIGHTS AND MEASURES; EMBRYO, NONMAMMALIAN; EVOLUTION; EYE; MORPHOGENESIS; PHENOTYPE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SOMITES; TIME FACTORS; VARIATION (GENETICS); ZEBRAFISH;

DANIO; DANIO RERIO; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 7244225022     PISSN: 0022104X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jez.b.21010     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Alberch P. 1985. Problems with the interpretation of developmental sequences. Syst Zool Mobile 34:46-58.
2. Ballard WB. 1981. Morphogenetic movements and fate maps of vertebrates. Am. Zool. 21:391-199.
3. Bininda-Emonds ORP, Jeffery JE, and Richardson MK. 2003. Inverting the hourglass: quantitative evidente against the phylotypic stage in vertebrate development. Proc R Soc London 270:341-346.
4. Bolker JA. 2000. Modularity in development and why it matters to evo-devo. Amer Zool 40:770-776.
5. Chernoff B and Magwene PM, 1999. Morphological integration: forty years later. In: Morphological Integration. Olson EC and Miller RL. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. 319-353.
6. Chipman AD, Haas A, Tchernov E, and Khaner O. 2000. Variation in anuran embryogenesis: differences in sequence and timing of early developmental events. J Exp Zool (Mol Dev Evol) 288:352-365.
7. Cockburn A. 1995. Evolutions-Oekologie. (Fischer G, Cohen J, editors). Reproduction. Butterworth, London.
8. De Beer GR. 1958. Embryos and Ancestors. Clarendon Press, Oxford UK.
9. Duboule D. 1994. Temporal colinearity and the phylotypic progression: a basis for the stability of a vertebrate Bauplan and the evolution of morphologies through heterochrony. Dev Suppl 1994:135-142.
10. Falconer DS and Mackay TFC. 1996. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. 4th Ed. Longman Sci. and Tech., Harlow, UK.
11. Galis F and Metz JA. 2001. Testing the vulnerability of the phylotypic stage: on modularity and evolutionary conservation. J Exp Zool (Mol Dev Evol) 291:195-204.
12. Galis F, van Dooren TJM and Metz JA. 2002. Conservation of the segmented germband stage: robustness or pleiotropy? Trends Genetics 18:504-509.
13. Galis F and Sinervo B. 2002. Divergence and convergence in early embryonic stages of metazoans. Contributions to Zoology 71(1/3):101-113.
14. Galis F, Wagner GP, and Jockush E. 2003. Why is limb regeneration possible in amphibians but not in reptiles, birds, and mammals? Evolution and Development 52:1-13.
15. Garstang W. 1922. The theory of recapitulation: A critical restatement of the biogenetic law. J Linn Soc Zool 35:81-101.
16. Gould SJ. 1977. Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
17. Haeckel E. 1866. Generelle Morphologie. 2 Vols., G. Reimer, Berlin.
18. Haeckel E. 1903. Anthropogenie oder Entwicklungsgeschichte des Menschen. Leipzig, Engelmann. Hall BK. 1997. Phylotypic stage or phantom: is there a highly conserved embryonic stage in vertebrates? Trends Ecol Evol 12:461-463.
19. Haeckel E. 1903. Anthropogenie oder Entwicklungsgeschichte des Menschen. Leipzig, Engelmann. Hall BK. 1997. Phylotypic stage or phantom: is there a highly conserved embryonic stage in vertebrates? Trends Ecol Evol 12:461-463.
20. Hall BK. 1999. Evolutionary Developmental Biology. 2nd edition, Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht.
21. Hernandez LP, Barresi JF, and Devoto SH, 2002. Functional morphology and developmental biology of zebra fish: reciprocal illumination from an unlikely couple. Integ Comp Biol 42:222-231.
22. Horder TJ. 1983. Embryological bases of evolution. Development and Evolution. (Goodwin BC, Holder N, Wylie CG, editors), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK: 315-352.
23. Irmler I. 2001. Variabilität im phylotypischen Stadium bei Zebrafischen. Unpublished Diploma thesis, Department of Biology, University of Jena.
24. Kimmel CB, Ballard WW, Kimmel SR, Ullmann B, and Schilling TF. 1995. Stages of embryonic development of the zebra fish. Dev Dyn 203:253-310.
25. Klingenberg CP. and Ekau W. 1996. Combined morphometric and phylogenetic analysis of an ecomorphological trend: pelagization in Antarctic fishes (Perciformes: Nototheniidae). Biol J Linn Soc 59:143-177.
26. Kirschner M. and Gerhart J. 1998. Evolvability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:8420-8427.
27. Lynch M and Walsh B. 1998. Genetics and Analyses of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer, Sunderland, USA.
28. Raff RA. 1994. Developmental mechanism in the evolution of animal form: origins and evolvability of body plans. In: Early Life on Earth (Bengston S, editor). Columbia University Press, New York. 489-500.
29. Raff RA. 1996. The Shape of Life. Genes, Development, and the Evolution of Animal Form. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
30. Raff RA, Wray GA, and Henry JJ. 1991. Implications of radical evolutionary changes in early development for concepts of developmental constraint. In: New Perspectives on Evolution. (Warren L and Koprowski H, editors). Wiley-Liss. New York. 189-207.
31. Rice SH. 1983. The evolution of canalization and the breaking of von Baer's laws: modelling the evolution of development with epistasis. Evolution 52:647-656.
32. Richardson MK. 1995. Heterochrony and the phylotypic period. Dev Biol 172:412-421.
33. Richardson MK. 1999. Vertebrate Evolution: the developmental origins of adult variation. BioEssays 21:604-613.
34. Richardson MK, Hanken J, Gooneratne ML, Pieau C, Raynaud A, Selwood L, and Wright GM. 1997. There is no highly conserved embryonic stage in the vertebrates: implications for current theories of evolution and development. Anat Embryol 196:91-106.
35. Richardson MK, Jeffery JE, Coates MI, Bininda-Emonds OR. 2001. Comperative methods in development. Zoology 104:278-283.
36. Richardson MK, and Oelschläger HHA. 2002. Time, pattern, and heterochrony: a study of hyperphalangy in the dolphin embryo flipper. Evolution and Development 4:435-444.
37. Roth G and Wake DB. 1985. Trends in the functional morphology and sensorimotor control of feeding behavior in salamanders: an example of the role of internal dynamics in evolution. Acta Biotheoretica Leiden 34:175-192.
38. Sander K. 1983. The evolution of patterning mechanisms: gleanings from insect embryogenesis and spermatogenesis. In: Development and Evolution (Goodwin BC, Holder N, Wylie CC, editors), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 123-159.
39. Sander K and Schmidt-Ott U. 2004. Evo-devo aspects of classical and molecular data in a historical perspective. J Exp Zool (Mol Dev Evol) 302b:69-91.
40. Schwenk K. 2001. Functional units and their evolution. In: The Character Concept in Evolutionary Biology. (Wagner GP, editor). Academic Press, San Diego. 165-198.
41. Schwenk K and Wagner GP. 2003. Constraint. In: Key Words and Concepts in Evolutionary Developmental Biology. (Hall BK, Olson WM, editors). Harvard University Press, Cambridge. 52-61.
42. Schwenk K and Wagner GP. 2004. The relativism of constraints on phenotypic evolution. In: Phenotypic Integration: Studying the Ecology and Evolution of Complex Phenotypes. (Pigliucci M and Preston K, editors). Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford. 390-408.
43. Seidel F. 1960. Körpergrundgestalt und Keimstruktur. Eine Erörterung über die Grundlagen der vergleichenden und experimentellen Embryologie und deren Gültigkeit bei phylogenetischen Überlegungen. Zool Anz 164:245-305.
44. Slack JMW, Holland PWH, and Graham CF. 1993. The zootype and the phylotypic stage. Nature 361:490-492.
45. von Baer KE. 1828. Entwicklungsgeschichte der Tiere. Beobachtungen und Reflexionen. Königsberg: Bornträger, 264 pp.
46. Wagner GP. 1988. Developmental constraints. Population, Genetics and Evolution. (de Jong G, editor) Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg: 222-229.
47. Wagner GP and Altenberg L. 1996. Perspective: Complex Adaptations and the Evolution of Evolvability. Evolution 50:967-976.
48. Wake D. 1989. Phylogenetic implications of ontogenetic data. Geobios, memoire special 12:369-378.
49. Williams GC. 1991. Natural Selection. Domains, Levels and Challenges. Oxford Series in Ecology and Evolution. Oxford University Press, New York.