Attitudes and beliefs concerning prostate cancer genetic screening

Clinical Genetics

Volumn 66, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 445-451

  Doukas, David J ^a   Localio, A Russell ^b   Li, Yuelin ^b  

^a University of Louisville School of Medicine   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision making; Genetic testing; Medical ethics; Prostate cancer; Screening; Values

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; CANCER RISK; COMMUNITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DEMOGRAPHY; EDUCATION; ETHNOLOGY; FAMILY; GENETIC SCREENING; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MALE; MOTIVATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SELF EVALUATION; SOCIETY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TELEPHONE; THEORETICAL MODEL; URBAN POPULATION;

ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; GENETIC SCREENING; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS;

EID: 7244220060     PISSN: 00099163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2004.00305.x     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bock CH, Cunningham JM, McDonnell SK et al. Analysis of the prostate cancer-susceptibility locus hpc20 in 172 families affected by prostate cancer. Am J Hum Genet 2001: 68: 795-801.
2. Bratt O. Hereditary prostate cancer. BJU Int 2000: 85: 588-598.
3. Grönberg H, Isaacs SD, Smith JR et al. Characteristics of prostate cancer in families potentially linked to the hereditary prostate cancer 1 (hpc1) locus. JAMA 1997: 278: 1251-1255.
4. Ostrander EA, Stanford JL. Genetics of prostate cancer: too many loci, too few genes. Am J Hum Genet 2000: 67: 1367-1375.
5. Xu J, Zheng S, Chang B, Smith J, Carpten J, Stine O. Linkage of prostate cancer susceptibility loci to chromosome 1. Hum Genet 2001: 108: 335-345.
6. Verhage B, Baffoe-Bonnie A, Baglietto L, Smith D, Bailey-Wilson J, Beaty T. Autosomal dominant inheritance of prostate cancer: a confirmatory study. Urology 2001: 57: 97-101.
7. Peters M, Ostrander E. Prostate Cancer: simplicity to complexity. Nat Genet 2001: 27: 134-135.
8. Zheng S, Xu J, Isaacs S, Wiley K, Chang B, Bleecker E. Evidence for a prostate cancer linkage to chromosome 20 in 159 hereditary prostate cancer families. Hum Genet 2001: 108: 430-435.
9. Tavtigian S, Simard J, Teng D, Abtin V, Baumgard M, Beck A. A candidate prostate cancer susceptibility gene at chromosome 17p. Nat Genet 2001: 27: 172-180.
10. Vesprini D, Nam R, Trachtenberg J, Jewett M, Tavtigian S, Emami M. HPC2 variants and screen-detected prostate cancer. Am J Hum Genet 2001: 68: 912-917.
11. Millstein SG. Utility the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior for predicting physician behavior: a prospective analysis. Health Psychol 1996: 15: 398-402.
12. Montano DE, Taplin SH. A test of an expanded theory of reasoned action to predict mammography participation. Soc Sci Med 1991: 32 (6): 733-741.
13. Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1980.
14. Hill D, Gardner G, Rassaby J. Factors predisposing women to take precautions against breast and cervix cancer. J Appl Soc Psychol 1985: 15 (1): 59-79.
15. Becker MH, ed. The Health Belief Model and Personal Health Behavior. Thorofare, New Jersey: Charles B. Slack, Inc., 1974.
16. Evers-Kiebooms G, Decruyenaere M. Predictive testing for Huntington's disease: a challenge for persons at risk and for professionals. Patient Education Counseling 1998: 35: 15-26.
17. Bunn JY, Bosompra K, Ashikaga T, Flynn BS, Worden JK. Factors influencing intention to obtain a genetic test for colon cancer risk: a population-based study. Prev Med 2002: 34: 567-577.
18. Michie S, Weinman J, Miller J et al. High risk expectations in the face of low risk information. J Behav Med 2002: 25: 33-50.
19. Doukas DJ, Fetters M, Coyne JC, McCullough LB. How men view genetic testing for prostate cancer risk: findings from focus groups. Clin Genet 2000: 58: 169-176.
20. Landis RJ, Heyman ER, Koch GG. Average partial association in three-way contingency tables. A review and discussion of alternative tests. Int Stat Rev 1978: 46: 237-254.
21. Doukas DJ. Genetics providers and the family covenant: connecting individuals with their families. Genet Test 2003: 7 (4): 315-321.