Q of the Indian shield

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America

Volumn 94, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 1564-1570

  Singh, S K ^a   Garcia D ^b   Pacheco, J F ^a   Valenzuela, R ^a   Bansal, B K ^c   Dattatrayam, R S ^d  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

^b UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

^c DEPARTMENT OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (India)

^d INDIA METEOROLOGICAL DEPARTMENT   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTENUATION; EARTHQUAKES; RANDOM PROCESSES;

GROUND MOTIONS; SPECTRAL ATTENUATION;

SEISMIC WAVES;

DATA SET; SEISMIC ATTENUATION; SHIELD; SPECTRAL ANALYSIS; SURFACE WAVE;

ASIA; EASTERN HEMISPHERE; EURASIA; INDIAN SHIELD; SOUTH ASIA; WORLD;

EID: 7244220047     PISSN: 00371106     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1785/012003214     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Bakun, W. H., and A. McGarr (2002). Differences in attenuation among the stable continental regions, Geophys. Res. Lett. 29, 2121, doi 10.1029/2002GL015457.
2. Chun, K.-Y., G. F. West, R. J. Kokoski, and C. Samson (1987). A novel technique for measuring Lg attenuation: results from eastern Canada between 1 and 10 Hz, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 77, 398-419.
3. Gupta, I. N., and K. L. McLaughlin (1987). Attenuation of ground motions in the eastern United States, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 77, 366-383.
4. Hasegawa, H. S. (1985). Attenuation of Lg waves in the Canadian shield, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 75, 1569-1582.
5. Herrmann, R. B., and A. Kijko (1983). Modelling some empirical vertical component Lg relations, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 73, 157-171.
6. John, V. (1983). Coda-Q studies in the Indian subcontinent, M.S. Thesis, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri.
7. Joyner, W. B., and D. M. Boore (1981). Peak horizontal acceleration and velocity from the strong-motion records including records from the 1979 Imperial Valley, California earthquake, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 71, 2011-2038.
8. Mitchell, B. J., Y. Pan, J. Xie, and L. Cong (1997). Lg coda Q variation across Eurasia and its relation to crustal evolution, J. Geophys. Res. 102, 22,767-22,779.
9. Shi, J., W.-Y. Kim, and P. G. Richards (1996). Variability of crustal attenuation in the northeastern United States from Lg waves, J. Geophys. Res. 101, 25,231-25,242.
10. Shin, T.-C., and R. B. Herrmann (1987). Lg attenuation and source studies using 1982 Miramichi data, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 77, 384-397.
11. Singh, S. K., M. Ordaz, R. S. Dattatrayam, and H. K. Gupta (1999). A spectral analysis of the May 21, 1997, Jabalpur, India earthquake (M w 5.8) and estimation of ground motion from future earthquakes in the Indian shield region, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 89, 1620-1630.
12. Singh, S. K., W. Mohanty, B. K. Bansal, and G. S. Roonwal (2002). Ground motion in Delhi form future large/great earthquakes in the central seismic gaps of the Himalayan arc, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 92, 555-569.
13. w 7.6) and for future earthquakes in India, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 93, 353-370.
14. Yu, G., K. N. Khattri, J. G. Anderson, J. N. Brune, and Y. Zeng (1995). Strong ground motion from the Uttarkashi, Himalaya, India, earthquake: comparison of observations with synthetics using the composite source model, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 85, 31-50.