Additivity dominance: Additivites are more potent and more often lexicalized across languages than are "subtractives"

Judgment and Decision Making

Volumn 4, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 475-478

  Rozin, Paul ^a   Fischler, Claude ^b   Shields Argelès, Christy ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b Centre Edgar Morin   (France)

^c AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF PARIS   (France)

Author keywords

Additive; Food; Medicine; Natural

Indexed keywords

EID: 72249113182     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19302975     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Baron, J., & Ritov, I. (2009). Protected values and omission bias as deontological judgments. In D. M. Bartels, C. W. Bauman, L. J. Skitka, & D. L. Medin (Eds.), Moral Judgment and decision making, Vol. 50 in B. H. Ross (series editor), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, pp. 133-167. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
2. Baron, J. & Ritov, I. (1993). Intuitions about penalties and compensation in the context of tort law. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 7, 17-33.
3. Fischler, C, & Masson, E., Eds. (2008). Manger. Français, Européens et Américains face à l'alimentation. Odile-Jacob, Paris.
4. Kahneman, D., Ritov I., Jacowitz, K. E, & Grant, P. (1993). Stated willingness to pay for public goods: A psychological perspective. Psychological Science, 4, 310-315.
5. Newman, J., Wolff, W. T. & Hearst, E. (1980) The Feature-Positive Effect in adult human subjects, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 630-650.
6. Rozin, P. (2005). The meaning of natural: Process more important than content. Psychological Science, 16,652-658.
7. Rozin, P. (2006). Naturalness judgments by lay Americans: Process dominates content in judgments of food or water acceptability and naturalness. Judgment and Decision Making, 1, 91-97.
8. Rozin, P., Fischler, C., & Shields-Argelés, C. (submitted). European and American perspectives on the meaning of natural.
9. Rozin, P., & Nemeroff, C. (2002). Sympathetic magical thinking: the contagion and similarity "heuristics". In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases. The psychology of intuitive judgment, pp. 201-216. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
10. Rozin, P., & Royzman, E. (2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 296-320.
11. Sjoberg, L. (2000). Perceived risk and tampering with nature. Journal of Risk Research, 3, 367-379
12. Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236, 280-285.
13. Spranca, M. (1992). The effect of naturalness on desirability and preference in the domain of foods. Unpublished master's thesis, University of California, Berkeley,