Managing the risk of insect resistance to transgenic insect control traits: Practical approaches in local environments

Pest Management Science

Volumn 66, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 100-106

  MacIntosh, Susan C ^a  

^a MacIntosh and Associates Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Bacillus thuringiensis; Bt crops; Insect resistance management; Regulatory

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL PROTEIN; ENDOTOXIN; HEMOLYSIN; INSECTICIDAL CRYSTAL PROTEIN, BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS;

BIOLOGICAL CONTROL; CULTIVATION; GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISM; MONOCULTURE; REGULATORY APPROACH; RESISTANCE MANAGEMENT; RISK ASSESSMENT; STAKEHOLDER;

AGRICULTURE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; COTTON; INDIA; INSECT; INSECT CONTROL; INSECTICIDE RESISTANCE; TRANSGENIC PLANT;

AGRICULTURE; ANIMALS; BACTERIAL PROTEINS; ENDOTOXINS; GOSSYPIUM; HEMOLYSIN PROTEINS; INDIA; INSECT CONTROL; INSECTICIDE RESISTANCE; INSECTS; PLANTS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED;

AFRICA; NORTH AMERICA; SOUTHEAST ASIA;

BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS; HEXAPODA;

EID: 72249108252     PISSN: 1526498X     EISSN: 15264998     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ps.1854     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. International Service for the Acquisition of Agribiotech Application (ISAAA) Brief 37-(2007).Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops [Online]. Available: http://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/briefs/37/executivesummary/default.html [26 March 2009].
2. Betz FS, Hammond BG and Fuchs RL, Safety and advantages of Bacillus thuringiensis-protected plants to control insect pests. Reg Toxicol Pharmacol 32:156-173 (2000).
3. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Consensus Document on Safety Information on Transgenic Plants Expressing Bacillus thuringiensis-derived Insect Control Protein [Online].Available:http://appli1.oecd.org/olis/2007doc.nsf/linkto/envjm-mono(2007)14 [26 March 2009].
4. United States Environmental Protection Agency (US-EPA), Biopesticides Registration Action Document Bacillus thuringiensis Plant-incorporated Protectants [Online]. (2001). Available: http://www.epa.gov/oppbppd1/biopesticides/pips/bt_brad.htm [26 March 2009].
5. Brookes G and Barfoot P, GM crops: The First Ten Years Global Socio economic and Environmental Impacts [Online]. ISAAA Briefs, Brief 36 (2008). Available: http://www.isaaa.org/ [26 March 2009].
6. Gianessi LP, Silvers CS, Sankula S and Carpenter JE, Plant Biotechnology: Current and Potential Impact for Improving Pest Management in U.S. Agriculture. An Analysis of 40 Case Studies [Online]. (2002). Available: www.ncfap.org/publications.html. [26 March 2009].
7. Yu SJ, The Toxicology and Biochemistry of Insecticides. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (2008).
8. Ferré J, and Van Rie J, Biochemistry and genetics of insect resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis. Annu Rev Entomol 47:501-533 (2002).
9. Fitt G, Deployment and impact of transgenic Bt cotton in Australia, in The Economic and Environmental Impacts of AgBiotech: A Global Perspective, ed. by Kalaitzandonakes NG. Springer, New York, pp. 141-164 (2003).
10. Wu KM and Guo YY, The evolution of cotton pest management practices in China. Annu Rev Entomol 50:31-52 (2005).
11. Matten SR, Head GP and Quemada HD, How governmental regulation can help or hinder the integration of Bt crops within IPM programs, in Integration of Insect-resistant GM Crops within IPM Programs, ed by Romeis J, Shelton AM and Kennedy GG. Springer, New York, pp. 27-39 (2008).
12. VanRie J, McGaughey WH, Johnson DE, Barnett BD and VanMellaert H, Mechanism of insect resistance to the microbial insecticide Bacillus thuringiensis. Science 247:72-74 (1990).
13. Ferré J, Real DM, VanRie J, Jansens S and Peferoen M, Resistance to the Bacillus thuringiensis bioinsecticide in a field population of Plutella xylostella is due to a change in a midgut membrane receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 88:5119-5123 (1991).
14. Tabashnik BE, Johnson KW, Engleman JT and Baum JA, Crossresistance of the diamondback moth indicates altered interactions with domain II of Bacillusthuringiensis toxins. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:2839-2844 (1996).
15. Roush RT, Managing pests and their resistanceto Bacillusthuringiensis: Can transgenic crops be better than sprays? Biocontrol Sci Tech 4:501-516 (1994).
16. Roush RT, Bt-transgenic crops: just another pretty insecticide or a chance for a new start in resistance management? Pestic Sci 51:328-334 (1997).
17. Gould F, Sustainability of transgenic insecticidal cultivars: Integrating pest genetics and ecology. Ann Rev Entomol 43:701-726 (1988).
18. Bernays EA and Minkenberg OPJM, Insectherbivores:different reasons for being a generalist. Ecology 7:1157-1169 (1997).
19. Zhao JZ, Cao J, Collins HL, Bates SL, Roush RT, Earle ED, et al., Concurrent use of transgenic plants expressing a single and two Bacillus thuringiensis genes speeds insect adaptation to pyramided plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:8426-8430 (2005).
20. Marçon PCRG, Siegried BD, Spencer T and Hutchinson WD, Development of a diagnostic concentrations for monitoring Bacillus thuringiensis resistance in European Corn Borer (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). J Econ Entomol 93:925-930 (2000).
21. Bravo A, and Soberón M, How to cope with insect resistance to Bt toxins? Trends Biotechnol 26:573-579 (2008).
22. Soberón M, Pardo-López L, López I, Gómez I, Tabashnik BE and Bravo A, Engineering modified Bttoxinstocounter insectresistance. Science 318:1640-1642 (2007).
23. Walters FS, Stacy CM, Lee MK, Palekar N and Chen JS, An engineered chymotrypsin/cathepsin G site in domain I renders Bacillus thuringiensis Cry3A active against western corn rootworm larvae. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:367-374 (2008).