The role of carbon capture technologies in greenhouse gas emissions-reduction models: A parametric study for the U.S. power sector

Energy Policy

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 1177-1191

  Bistline, John E ^a   Rai, Varun ^b  

^a Stanford University   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Carbon capture and storage; Integrated assessment modeling; Technological diffusion

Indexed keywords

A-CARBON; CAPTURE SYSTEM; CARBON CAPTURE; CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE; COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT; DEPLOYMENT SCENARIOS; ELECTRICITY SECTOR; EMISSIONS REDUCTION; GAIN INSIGHT; GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS; INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT; INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT MODELING; MODEL RESULTS; PARAMETRIC STUDY; POWER SECTOR; REDUCTION MODELS; REDUCTION TARGETS; SUPPLY AND DEMAND; TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION;

COAL; COMPETITION; DIFFUSION; FOSSIL FUEL POWER PLANTS; GAS PLANTS; GLOBAL WARMING; GREENHOUSE GASES; GREENHOUSES; LEAKAGE (FLUID); MINING; RETROFITTING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TECHNOLOGY;

GAS EMISSIONS;

CARBON SEQUESTRATION; COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT; DEMAND ELASTICITY; ELECTRICITY INDUSTRY; EMISSION CONTROL; GREENHOUSE GAS; MODELING; TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 72249100607     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.008     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Aiken, R., Ditzel, K., et al., 2004. Coal-Based Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle: Market Penetration Strategies and Recommendations. Booz Allen Hamilton, report prepared for: US Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory, and Gasification Technologies Council under contract DE-AM26-99FT40575, September 2004.
2. Arthur W. Positive Feedbacks in the Economy. Scientific American 262 Number 2 (1990) 92-99
3. Beér J. High efficiency electric power generation: The environmental role. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 33 (2007) 107-134
4. Cullenward D. Carbon Capture and Storage: An Assessment of Required Technological Growth Rates and Capital Investments. Program on Energy and Sustainable Development Working Paper #84 (2009), Stanford University, Stanford, CA
5. 2. Energy 32 (2007) 1163-1176
6. DOE, 2006. Energy Demands on Water Resources. Report to Congress on the Interdependency of Energy and Water. US Department of Energy, Washington, D.C.
7. Dooley, J., Edmonds, J., et al., 2002. Modeling Carbon Capture and Storage Technologies in Energy and Economic Models. Paper prepared for the IPCC Workshop for Carbon Capture and Storage, Regina, Canada, 2002.
8. EIA, 2006a. Annual Energy Outlook 2006 with Projections to 2030, DOE/EIA-0383(2006). Energy Information Administration, US Department of Energy, Washington, D.C.
9. EIA, 2006b. Assumptions to the Annual Energy Outlook 2006 with Projections to 2030, DOE/EIA-0554(2006). Energy Information Administration, US Department of Energy, Washington, D.C.
10. EIA, 1998. Impacts of the Kyoto Protocol on U.S. Energy Markets and Economic Activity, SR/OIAF/98-03. Energy Information Administration, US Department of Energy, Washington, D.C.
11. EPA, 2008. Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2006, USEPA #430-R-08-005. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
12. 2 Capture: EPRI's CoalFleet for Tomorrow Vision. Electric Power Research Institute Interim Report 1016877, Palo Alto, CA.
13. 2 emissions: the full portfolio. Electric Power Research Institute Report 1015461, Palo Alto, CA.
14. EPRI, 2006. Feasibility Study for an Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle Facility at a Texas Site. Electric Power Research Institute Report 1014510, Palo Alto, CA.
15. Fowler, M., 2008. The Role of Carbon Capture and Storage Technology in Attaining Global Climate Stability Targets: A Literature Survey. Paper prepared for the Clean Air Task Force, Boston, MA, February 2008.
16. Gough, C., Shackley, S., 2005. An Integrated Assessment of Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage in the UK. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, Technical Report 47.
17. Grübler A. Time for a change: on the patterns of diffusion of innovation. In: Ausubel J., and Langford H. (Eds). Technological Trajectories and the Human Environment (1997), National Academy Press, Washington, D.C 14-32
18. Herzog, H., 2008. Carbon Capture & Sequestration Economics. Presentation for: Public Workshops on Carbon Capture and Sequestration, February 13-14, 2008.
19. IEA. World Energy Outlook 2007. International Energy Agency (2007), OECD/IEA
20. IPCC, 2006. In: Metz, B., Davidson, O., de Coninck, H.C., Loos, M., Meyer, L.A. (Eds.), IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. Prepared by Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, New York, NY.
21. 2 emissions. Energy Policy 32 (2004) 367-382
22. Klara, J., Woods, M., et al., 2007. Cost and Performance Baseline for Fossil Energy Plants, DOE/NETL-2007/1281. Volume 1: Bituminous Coal and Natural Gas to Electricity, prepared by Research and Development Solutions, LLC (RDS), August 2007.
23. Larsen, J., Heilmayr, R., 2009. Comparison of Legislative Climate Change Targets. World Resources Institute, June 2009.
24. Löschel, A., 2002. Technological Change in Economic Models of Environmental Policy: A Survey. Prepared for Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, January 2002.
25. Lund P. Market penetration rates of new energy technologies. Energy Policy 34 (2006) 3317-3326
26. McFarland J., and Herzog H. Incorporating carbon capture and storage technologies in integrated assessment models. Energy Economics 28 (2006) 632-652
27. NARUC, 2008. Clean Coal Generation Technologies for New Power Plants. The National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners Grants & Research Department report, March 2008.
28. Nauclér, T., Campbell, W., et al., 2008. Carbon Capture & Storage: Assessing the Economics. McKinsey Climate Change Special Initiative.
29. NETL, 2006. Estimating Freshwater Needs to Meet Future Thermoelectric Generation Requirements, DOE/NETL-1235(2006). National Energy Technology Laboratory, US Department of Energy, August 2006.
30. Rai V., Chung N., et al. PESD Carbon Storage Project Database. Program on Energy and Sustainable Development Working Paper #76 (2008), Stanford University, Stanford, CA
31. 2 capture: implications of an illustrative long-term energy policy. In: Rubin E., Keith D., et al. (Eds). Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Vancouver, Canada (2005), Elsevier Science, Oxford, UK
32. Riahi K., Rubin E., et al. Technological learning for carbon capture and sequestration technologies. Energy Economics 26 (2004) 539-564
33. 2 capture and storage. Energy Policy 35 (2007) 4444-4454
34. Shackley S., and Gough C. Carbon Capture and its Storage: An Integrated Assessment (2006), Ashgate Publishing Company, Burlington, VT
35. Simpson A., and Simon A. Second law comparison of oxy-fuel combustion and post-combustion carbon dioxide separation. Energy Conversion and Management 48 (2007) 3034-3045
36. Stauffer N. A quicker, easier way to make coal cleaner. Massachusetts Institute of Technology TechTalk 53 Number 9 (2008)
37. Stern N. The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review (2006), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
38. Vattenfall/McKinsey, 2007. Global mapping of greenhouse gas abatement opportunities up to 2030.
39. Weyant J. Introduction and overview. Energy Economics 26 (2004) 501-515
40. 2 Capture from Pulverized Coal Plants (2006), Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA
41. Wilson E., and Gerard D. Carbon Capture and Sequestration: Integrating Technology, Monitoring and Regulation (2007), Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK
42. Wise, M., Dooley, J., 2007. Baseload and Peaking Economics and the Resulting Adoption of a Carbon Dioxide Capture-and-Storage System for Electric Power Plants. Battelle, Pacific Northwest Division technical report number PNWD-SA-6521.
43. Yamagata, B., 2008. Outlook for Next Generation Coal and Nuclear Panel. Coal Utilization Research Council. In: State Summit on Clean Power and Efficiency, Overland Park, KS.