Holding schools accountable for the growth of nonproficient students: Coordinating measurement and accountability

Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 27-41

  Dunn, Jennifer L ^a   Allen, Jessica ^b  

^a Measured Progress   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

Accountability; Growth; NCLB

Indexed keywords

EID: 72249095015     PISSN: 07311745     EISSN: 17453992     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-3992.2009.00160.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Alaska Department of Education (2007a). Alaska growth model proposal. Retrieved August 31, 2007 from http://www.ed.gov/admins/lead/account/ growthmodel/ak/index.html.
2. Alaska Department of Education (2007b). Peer review guidance for the NCLB growth model pilot applications: Alaska response. Retrieved August 31, 2007 from http://www.ed.gov/admins/lead/account/growthmodel/ak/index.html.
3. Alaska Response (2007). Letter from education commission of Alaska to assistant secretary of United States Department of Education. Retrieved August 31, 2007 from http://www.ed.gov/admins/lead/account/growthmodel/ak/index.html.
4. Arizona Department of Education (2007a). Proposal for a growth model to evaluate adequately yearly progress for schools and districts. Retrieved August 31, 2007 from http://www.ed.gov/admins/lead/account/growthmodel/ak/index.html.
5. Arizona Department of Education (2007b). Addendum to Arizona's Growth Proposal: Adjustments for Regression to the Mean and error in gain scores. Retrieved August 31, 2007 from http://www.ed.gov/admins/lead/account/ growthmodel/ak/index.html.
6. Arkansas Department of Education (2006a). Arkansas growth model proposal. Retrieved August 31, 2007 from http://arkedu.state.ar.us/ark-growth-mod.
7. Arkansas Department of Education (2006b). Growth model amendments Retrieved August 31, 2007 from http://arkedu.state.ar.us/ark-growth-mod.
8. Arkansas Department of Education (2006c). Arkansas growth model proposal. Retrieved August 31, 2007 from http://www.ed.gov/admins/lead/account/ growthmodel/ar/argmp.doc.
9. Betebenner, D. (2009). Norm- and criterion-referenced student growth. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, this issue, 42 51.
10. Betebenner, D. W., & Shang, Y. (2007). Reference growth charts for educational outcomes. Paper presentation, annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
11. Carlson, D. (2006). Focusing state educational accountability systems: 4 methods of judging quality and progress. Retrieved November 21, 2007 from http://www.nciea.org/cgi-bin/pubspage.cgi.
12. Dunn, J. (2007). The interaction of measurement, models and accountability: How values affect our growth model choices. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
13. Delaware Department of Education (2006). Delaware's proposal for a growth model re-submitted to U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved August 31, 2007 from http://www.ed.gov/admins/lead/account/growthmodel/de/index.html.
14. Florida Department of Education (2007). Florida application for the NCLB growth model pilot program: Peer review documentation. Retrieved August 31, 2007 from http://www.ed.gov/admins/lead/account/growthmodel/fl/index.html.
15. Goldschmidt, P., Roschewski, P., Choi, K. C., Auty, W., Hebbler, S., & Williams, A. (2005). Policymakers' guide to growth models for school accountability: How do accountability models differ Washington, DC : CCSSO. Retrieved November 21, 2007 from http://www.ccsso.org/publications/details.cfm? PublicationID=287.
16. Hill, R., Gong, B., Marion, S., DePascale, C., Dunn, J., & Simpson, M. A. (2006). Using value tables to explicitly value growth. In R. Lissitz (Ed. Longitudinal and value added models of student performance (pp. 255 290). Maple Grove, MN : JAM Press.
17. Iowa Department of Education (2006). No Child Left Behind Growth Model Pilot Program. Retrieved August 31, 2007 from http://www.ed.gov/admins/lead/ account/growthmodel/ia/index.html.
18. North Carolina Department of Education 2006). North Carolina's proposal to pilot the use of a growth model for AYP purposes in 2005-2006 Retrieved August 31, 2007 from http://www.ed.gov/admins/lead/account/growthmodel/nc/index. html http://www.ed.gov/admins/lead/account/growthmodel/oh/index.html.
19. Ohio Department of Education (2007a). Addendum to the proposal to the United Sates Department of Education for employing a growth model for No Child Left Behind accountability purposes. Retrieved August 31, 2007 from http://www.ed.gov/admins/lead/account/growthmodel/oh/index.html.
20. Ohio Department of Education (2007b). Addendum to the proposal to the United Sates Department of Education for employing a growth model for No Child Left Behind accountability purposes. Retrieved August 31, 2007 from http://www.ed.gov/admins/lead/account/growthmodel/oh/index.html.
21. Spellings, M. (2005). Secretary Spellings Announces Growth Model Pilot, Address Chief State School Officers' Annual Policy Forum in Richmond. U.S. Department of Education Press Release. Retrieved August 7, 2006 from http://www.ed.gov/news/pressreleases/2005/11/1182005.html.
22. Tennessee Department of Education (2006). Proposal to the U.S. Department of Education: NCLB growth model pilot program. Retrieved August 31, 2007 from http://www.ed.gov/admins/lead/account/growthmodel/tn/index.html.
23. U.S. Department of Education (2006a). Peer review guidance for the NCLB Growth model Pilot Applications. Retrieved November 21, 2006 from http://www.ed.gov/admins/lead/account/growthmodel/index.html.
24. U.S. Department of Education (2006b). Secretary Spellings approves additional growth model pilots for 2006-2007. Retrieved November 21, 2006 from http://www.ed.gov/news/pressreleases/2006/11/11092006a.html.
25. U.S. Department of Education (2005). Key policy letters signed by the Education Secretary or Deputy Secretary. Retrieved November 21, 2006 from http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/guid/secletter/051121.html.