Framing the oregon land use debate: An exploration of oregon voters' pamphlets, 1970-2007

Journal of Planning Education and Research

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 157-172

  Bassett, Ellen M ^a  

^a PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Framing; Land use planning; Oregon; Property rights; Regulatory takings

Indexed keywords

EID: 72149132524     PISSN: 0739456X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X09348746     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Abbott, Carl, Sy Adler, and Deborah Howe. 2003. A quiet counterrevolution in land use regulation: The origins and impact of Oregon's Measure 7. Housing Policy Debate 14 (3): 383-425.
2. Adler, Sy. 2008. Planners, environmentalists and lawyers, and the politics of land use legislation in Oregon. Presented at the International Planning History Conference, Chicago.
3. Bowler, Shawn, and Todd Donovan. 1994. Information and opinion change on ballot propositions. Political Behavior 16 (4): 409-451.
4. Bowler, Shawn, and Todd Donovan. 2002. Do voters have a cue? Television advertisements as a source of information in citizen-initiated referendum campaigns. European Journal of Political Research 41:777-93.
5. Buchanan, Yvonne. 2001. Exhuming Measure 7. Metroscape, Summer, pp. 21-25.
6. Canary, Cynthia. 2003. Know before you go: A case for publicly funded voters' guides. Ohio State Law Journal 64: 81-90.
7. Capital Press. 2007. Measure 49 passes; more work ahead. Salem, OR: Capital Press.
8. Caves, Roger W. 1992. Land use planning: The ballot box revolution. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9. Dorfman, Lori, Lawrence Wallack, and Katie Woodruff. 2005. More than a message: Public health advocacy to change corporate practices. Health Education and Behavior 32 (3): 320-36.
10. Farmer, Paul. 2007. Domestic policy watch. November. http://www.planning.org/domesticagenda/index.htm (accessed December 19, 2007).
11. Forester, John. 1989. Planning in the face of power. Berkeley: University of California Press.
12. Forester, John. 1999. The deliberative practitioner: Encouraging participatory planning processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Fulton, William, Paul Shigley, Alicia Harrison, and Paul Sezzi. 2002. Trends in local land use ballot Measures, 1986-2000. Solimar Research Group. http://www.solimar.org/pdf/trendslocalballot86.pdf.
14. Gerber, Elizabeth, and Justin Phillips. 2003. Evaluating the effects of direct democracy on public policy: California's urban growth boundaries. American Politics Research 33:310-30.
15. Hogan, Dave and Steve Mayes. 2000. Ballot items become money magnets. The Oregonian, November3, p. A01.
16. Jacobs, Harvey M. 1998. The wisdom, but uncertain future, of the Wise Use Movement. In Who owns America? Social conflict over property rights, ed. Harvey M. Jacobs, 29-44. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
17. Knaap, Gerrit. 1987. Self-interest and voter support for Oregon's land use controls. Journal of the American Planning Association 53 (1): 92-97.
18. Knaap, Gerrit, and Arthur C. Nelson. 1992. The regulated landscape: Lessons on state land use planning from Oregon. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
19. Kolodny, Annette. 1975. The lay of the land: Metaphor as experience and history in American life and letters. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
20. Lakoff, George. 1996. Moral politics: How liberals and conservatives think. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21. Lakoff, George. 2004. Don't think of an elephant: Know your values and frame the debate. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green.
22. Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23. Liberty, Robert. 1996. The battle over Tom McCall's legacy: The story of land use in the 1995 Oregon Legislature. Portland, OR: 1000 Friends of Oregon.
24. Magleby, D.B. 1989. Opinion formation and opinion change in ballot proposition campaigns. In Manipulating public opinion: Essays on public opinion as a dependent variable, ed. M. Margolis and G. Mauser, 95-115. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
25. Medler, J., and Mushkatel, A. 1979. Urban-rural class conflict in Oregon land use planning. Western Political Quarterly 32 (3): 338-49.
26. Neuendorf, Kimberly A. 2002. The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27. Nolan, Joseph R. and Jacqueline M. Nolan-Haley. 1991. Black's Law Dictionary. Abridged 6th ed. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Co.
28. Official General Voters' Pamphlet, 1978. Salem, OR: Office of the Secretary of State, Elections Division. Measure 6: pp.17-18.
29. Official General Voters' Pamphlet, 1982. Salem, OR: Office of the Secretary of State, Elections Division. Measure 10: pp. 57-65.
30. Official General Election Voters' Pamphlet-Statewide Measures, 2000. Salem, OR: Office of the Secretary of State, Elections Division. Measure 7: pp. 309-330.
31. Official General Election Voters' Pamphlet-Statewide Measures, 2004. Salem, OR: Office of the Secretary of State, Elections Division. Measure 37: pp. 103-132.
32. Official NovemberSpecial Election Voters' Pamphlet, 2007. Salem, OR: Office of the Secretary of State, Elections Division. Measure 49: pp. 7-62.
33. Official Voters' Pamphlet, General Election, November 13, 1970. Salem, OR: Office of the Secretary of State, Elections Division. Measure 11: pp. 48-51.
34. Official Voters' Pamphlet, General Election, November 2, 1976. Salem, OR: Office of the Secretary of State, Elections Division. Measure 10: pp. 32-35.
35. Oregon Secretary of State. 2008. State Initiative and Referendum Manual. Salem, OR: Oregon Secretary of State, Elections Division, p. 2.
36. Porteous, J. Douglas. 1982. Bodyscape: The body-landscape metaphor. Canadian Geographer 30 (1): 2-12.
37. Schon, Donald, and M. Rein. 1994. Frame reflection: Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. New York: Basic Books.
38. Seltzer, Ethan, and Shayna Rehberg. 2002. Planning at the ballot box: Better decisions or the end of planning? Monograph, Institute of Portland Metropolitan Studies, Portland, OR.
39. Smart Growth America. 2007. Oregon voters repeal taxpayer windfalls for land speculators, embrace farm and forest protection. Washington, DC: Smart Growth America.
40. Van Herzele, Ann. 2004. Local knowledge in action: Valuing nonprofessional reasoning in the planning process. Journal of Planning Education and Research 24 (2): 197-212.
41. Winett, Liana, R. Lawrence, and Gerald Sussman. 2001. Reading between the lines on Measure 7. Oregon's Future 2 (4): 24-5.