Message composition based on concepts and goals

International Journal of Speech Technology

Volumn 11, Issue 3-4, 2008, Pages 181-193

  Zock, Michael ^a   Sabatier, Paul ^a   Jakubiec, Line ^a  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

Author keywords

Conceptual input; Interactive natural language generation; Message composition; Message, completion

Indexed keywords

AUDIO-OUTPUT; BUILDING BLOCKES; LANGUAGE GENERATION; NATURAL LANGUAGE GENERATION; ON THE FLIES; ONE-STEP PROCESS; THREE SYSTEMS;

AUDIO SYSTEMS;

LINGUISTICS;

EID: 72149123395     PISSN: 13812416     EISSN: 15728110     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10772-009-9050-8     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Baker, C. F., Fillmore, C. J., & Lowe, J. B. (1998). The Berkeley FrameNet project. In COLING/ACL-98. Montreal (pp. 86-90).
2. Bateman, J., & Zock, M. (2003). Natural language generation. In R. Mitkov (Ed.), Oxford handbook of computational linguistics (pp. 284-304). London: Oxford University Press, Chap. 15.
3. Boitet, C., Bhattacharyya, P., Blanc, E., Meena, S., Boudhh, S., Fafiotte, G., Falaise, A., & Vacchani, V. (2007). Building Hindi-French-English-UNL resources for SurviTra-CIFLI, a linguistic survival system under construction. In Seventh international symposium on natural language processing. Pattayah (p. 7). Kasetsart University.
4. Briffault, X., & Zock, M. (1994). What do we mean when we say to the left or to the right? How to learn about space by building and exploring a microworld? In 6th international conference on artificial intelligence: methodology, systems, applications. Sofia (pp. 363-371).
5. Coq Development Team (2006-2008). The Coq proof assistant. Reference manual. INRIA.
6. Fellbaum, C. (1998). WordNet: an electronic lexical database and some of its applications. Cambridge: MIT Press.
7. Fromkin, V. (1993). Speech production. In J. Berko-Gleason & N. B. Ratner (Eds.), Psycholinguistics. Fort Worth: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
8. Hearst, M. (1998). Automated discovery of Word-Net relations. In C. Fellbaum (Ed.), WordNet an electronic lexical database (pp. 131-152). Cambridge: MIT Press.
9. Levelt, W. (1989). Speaking: from intention to articulation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
10. Ligozat, G., & Zock, M. (1992). How to visualize time, tense and aspect. In Proceedings of COLING '92. Nantes (pp. 475-482).
11. McCoy, K., & Cheng, J. (1991). Focus of attention: constraining what can be said next. In C. Paris, W. Swartout, & W. Mann (Eds.), Natural language generation in artificial intelligence and computational linguistics (pp. 103-124). Boston: Kluwer Academic.
12. Meteer, M. W. (1992). Expressibility and the problem of efficient text planning. London: Pinter.
13. G. A. Miller 1956 The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information Psychological Review 63 81 97 10.1037/h0043158
14. Nicolov, N., & Mellish, C. (2000). PROTECTOR: efficient generation with lexicalized grammars. In Recent advances in natural language processing (pp. 221-243). Amsterdam: Benjamins. Current issues in linguistic theory (CILT 189).
15. Pasero, R., & Sabatier, P. (1995). Guided sentences composition: some problems, solutions and applications. In Proceedings of the 5th international workshop on natural language understanding and logic programming (NLULP). Lisbon (pp. 97-110). Lisbon University.
16. Pasero, R., & Sabatier, P. (2007). ILLICO: présentation & principes, connaissances et formalismes & guide d'utilisation. Technical report, Laboratoire d'Informatique Fondamentale (LIF), Marseille, http://www.lif.univ-mrs.fr/illico.html.
17. Power, R., Scott, D., & Evans, R. (1998). What you see is what you meant: direct knowledge editings with natural language feedback. In H. Prade (Ed.), 13th European conference on artificial intelligence (ECAI'98) (pp. 677-681). Chichester: Wiley.
18. Reiter, E., & Dale, R. (2000). Building natural language generation systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. P. Sabatier 1997 Un lexique-grammaire du football Lingvisticæ Investigationes 21 1 163 197
20. Schank, R. (1975). Conceptual dependency theory. In R. C. Schank (Ed.), Conceptual information processing (pp. 22-82). Amsterdam/New York: North-Holland/Elsevier.
21. Schmidt, T. (2007). Multilingual FrameNets. In The Kicktionary-a multilingual lexical resource of football language. New York: de Gruyter.
22. Tesnière, L. (1959). Éléments de syntaxe structurale. Paris: Klincksieck.
23. Zock, M. (1991). Swim or sink: the problem of communicating thought. In M. Swartz & M. Yazdani (Eds.), Intelligent tutoring systems for foreign language learning (pp. 235-247). New York: Springer.
24. Zock, M. (1996). The power of words in message planning. In International conference on computational linguistics. Copenhagen (pp. 990-995).
25. Zock, M., & Afantenos, S. (2008). Verbal fluency, or how to stay on top of the wave. In B. Sharp & M. Zock (Eds.), NLPCS. Barcelona (pp. 159-164). INSTICC Press.
26. Zock, M., & Afantenos, S. (2009). Using e-Learning to achieve fluency in foreign languages. In A. Tzanavari & N. Tsapatsoulis (Eds.), Affective, interactive and cognitive methods for e-learning design: creating an optimal education experience. Hershey: IGI Global.
27. Zock, M., & Schwab, D. (2008). Lexical access based on underspecified input. In Proceedings of the workshop on cognitive aspects of the lexicon (COGALEX 2008). Manchester, United Kingdom (pp. 9-17). Coling 2008.