Adequacy of lymphadenectomy among men undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

BJU International

Volumn 105, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 88-92

  Cooperberg, Matthew R ^a   Kane, Christopher J ^b   Cowan, Janet E ^a   Carroll, Peter R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Laparoscopy; Lymphadenectomy; Prostate neoplasms; Prostatectomy; Robotics

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ARTICLE; BLADDER CANCER; CANCER GROWTH; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; CONTROLLED STUDY; GLEASON SCORE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY CANCER; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LYMPH NODE; LYMPH NODE DISSECTION; LYMPHADENECTOMY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; ROBOTICS;

HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; LYMPH NODE EXCISION; LYMPH NODES; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; LYMPHOCELE; MALE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; ROBOTICS;

EID: 72149112483     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: 1464410X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08699.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bader P, Burkhard FC, Markwalder R, Studer UE. Is a limited lymph node dissection an adequate staging procedure for prostate cancer? J Urol 2002 168 : 514 518
2. Heidenreich A, Varga Z, Von Knobloch R. Extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: high incidence of lymph node metastasis. J Urol 2002 167 : 1681 1686
3. Bader P, Burkhard FC, Markwalder R, Studer UE. Disease progression and survival of patients with positive lymph nodes after radical prostatectomy. Is there a chance of cure? J Urol 2003 169 : 849 854
4. Joslyn SA, Konety BR. Impact of extent of lymphadenectomy on survival after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Urology 2006 68 : 121 125
5. Castle EP, Lee D. Nomenclature of robotic procedures in urology. J Endourol 2008 22 : 1467 1470
6. Cooperberg MR, Freedland SJ, Pasta DJ et al. Multiinstitutional validation of the UCSF cancer of the prostate risk assessment for prediction of recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Cancer 2006 107 : 2384 2391
7. Partin AW, Mangold LA, Lamm DM, Walsh PC, Epstein JI, Pearson JD. Contemporary update of prostate cancer staging nomograms (Partin Tables) for the new millennium. Urology 2001 58 : 843 848
8. Cagiannos I, Karakiewicz P, Eastham JA et al. A preoperative nomogram identifying decreased risk of positive pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer. J Urol 2003 170 : 1798 1803
9. Burkhard FC, Bader P, Schneider E, Markwalder R, Studer UE. Reliability of preoperative values to determine the need for lymphadenectomy in patients with prostate cancer and meticulous lymph node dissection. Eur Urol 2002 42 : 84 90
10. Mattei A, Fuechsel FG, Bhatta Dhar N et al. The template of the primary lymphatic landing sites of the prostate should be revisited: results of a multimodality mapping study. Eur Urol 2008 53 : 118 125
11. Touijer K, Rabbani F, Otero JR et al. Standard vs limited pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer in patients with a predicted probability of nodal metastasis greater than 1%. J Urol 2007 178 : 120 124
12. Allaf ME, Palapattu GS, Trock BJ, Carter HB, Walsh PC. Anatomical extent of lymph node dissection: impact on men with clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol 2004 172 : 1840 1844
13. Daneshmand S, Quek ML, Stein JP et al. Prognosis of patients with lymph node positive prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy: long-term results. J Urol 2004 172 : 2252 2255
14. Messing EM, Manola J, Sarosdy M, Wilding G, Crawford ED, Trump D. Immediate hormonal therapy compared with observation after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in men with node-positive prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 1999 341 : 1781 1788
15. Berglund RK, Sadetsky N, DuChane J, Carroll PR, Klein EA. Limited pelvic lymph node dissection at the time of radical prostatectomy does not affect 5-year failure rates for low, intermediate and high risk prostate cancer: results from CaPSURE. J Urol 2007 177 : 526 529
16. DiMarco DS, Zincke H, Sebo TJ, Slezak J, Bergstralh EJ, Blute ML. The extent of lymphadenectomy for pTXNO prostate cancer does not affect prostate cancer outcome in the prostate specific antigen era. J Urol 2005 173 : 1121 1125
17. Clark T, Parekh DJ, Cookson MS et al. Randomized prospective evaluation of extended versus limited lymph node dissection in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol 2003 169 : 145 147
18. Masterson TA, Bianco FJ Jr, Vickers AJ et al. The association between total and positive lymph node counts, and disease progression in clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol 2006 175 : 1320 1324
19. Gofrit ON, Zorn KC, Steinberg GD, Zagaja GP, Shalhav AL. The Will Rogers phenomenon in urological oncology. J Urol 2008 179 : 28 33
20. Musch M, Klevecka V, Roggenbuck U, Kroepfl D. Complications of pelvic lymphadenectomy in 1,380 patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy between 1993 and 2006. J Urol 2008 179 : 923 928
21. Wyler SF, Sulser T, Seifert HH et al. Laparoscopic extended pelvic lymph node dissection for high-risk prostate cancer. Urology 2006 68 : 883 887
22. Lattouf JB, Beri A, Jeschke S, Sega W, Leeb K, Janetschek G. Laparoscopic extended pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: description of the surgical technique and initial results. Eur Urol 2007 52 : 1347 1355
23. Heidenreich A, Ohlmann CH, Polyakov S. Anatomical extent of pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2007 52 : 29 37
24. Prasad SM, Keating NL, Wang Q et al. Variations in surgeon volume and use of pelvic lymph node dissection with open and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. Urology 2008 72 : 647 652
25. Briganti A, Capitanio U, Chun FK et al. Impact of surgical Volume on the rate of lymph node metastases in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection for clinically localized prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2008 54 : 794 802
26. Bochner BH, Herr HW, Reuter VE. Impact of separate versus en bloc pelvic lymph node dissection on the number of lymph nodes retrieved in cystectomy specimens. J Urol 2001 166 : 2295 2296
27. Stein JP, Penson DF, Cai J et al. Radical cystectomy with extended lymphadenectomy: evaluating separate package versus en bloc submission for node positive bladder cancer. J Urol 2007 177 : 876 881
28. Wawroschek F, Wagner T, Hamm M et al. The influence of serial sections, immunohistochemistry, and extension of pelvic lymph node dissection on the lymph node status in clinically localized prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2003 43 : 132 136