A conceptual framework for developing the curriculum and delivery of technology education in early childhood

International Journal of Technology and Design Education

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 353-365

  Turja, Leena ^a   Endepohls Ulpe, Martina ^b   Chatoney, Marjolaine ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

^b University of Koblenz   (Germany)

^c AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

Author keywords

Curriculum; Early childhood education; Gender; Play; Technology education

Indexed keywords

CHILDHOOD EDUCATION; CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS; GENDER; PEDAGOGICAL APPROACH; SENSITIVE TECHNOLOGY; TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION;

CURRICULA; TEACHING;

TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 72149108424     PISSN: 09577572     EISSN: 15731804     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10798-009-9093-9     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Alamäki, A. (1999). How to educate students for a technological future: Technology education in early childhood and primary education. Doctoral dissertation. University of Turku.
2. BOEN. (2002). MEN. Programme de l'école primaire. HS no. 1 du 14 février, Paris.
3. Bredekamp, S., & Rosegrant, T. (1992). Reaching potentials through appropriate curriculum: Conceptual frameworks for applying the guidelines. In S. Bredekamp & T. Rosegrant (Eds.), Reaching potentials: Appropriate curriculum and assessment for young children (Vol. 1, pp. 28-42). Washington: NAEYC.
4. Bredesen, O. (2004). Nye gutter og jenter-en ny pedagogikk? [New boys and new girls-new pedagogy?] NIKK, Nordisk Institutt for Kunnskap om Kjonn. Oslo: J.W. Cappelen Akademisk Forlag. Retrieved 25 September 2008, from http://www.nikk.uio.no/mannsforskning/publikasjoner/nyegutter.html.
5. Chatoney, M. (2003). Construction du concept de matériau dans l'enseignement des«sciences et technologie»à l'école primaire : perspectives curriculaires et didactiques. Thèse de doctorat, Aix-Marseille, Université de Provence.
6. Curriculum Framework for children 3-5. (2001). Scottish Consultative Council on the Curriculum (2nd rev. ed.). Dundee, Glasgow: Learning and Teaching Scotland. Retrieved 15 August 2009 from http://www.ltscotland.org.uk/ earlyyears/about/curriculum/framechildren3to5/guidance.asp.
7. Early technical education. (2003). Eu-project. Retrieved 5 August 2008, from www.earlytechnicaleducation.org.
8. de Vries, M. J. (2005). Teaching about technology: An introduction to the philosophy of technology for non-philosophers. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
9. Fried, L. (1990). Kindergartenerziehung heute: geschlechtstypisch oder geschlechtsflexibel? In K. Berty, L. Fried, H. Gieseke, & H. Herzfeld (Eds.), Emanzipation im Teufelskreis: Zur Genese weiblicher Lebensentwürf (pp. 44-69). Weinhiem: Deutscher Studien Verlag.
10. Fthenakis, W. E., & Oberhuemer, P. (Eds.). (2004). Frühpädagogik international, Bildungsqualität im Blickpunkt. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
11. Hannover, B. (2007). Vom biologischen zum psychologischen Geschlecht: Die Entwicklung von Geschlechtsunterschieden. In A. Renkl (Ed.), Pädagogische Psychologie (pp. 339-388). Bern: Huber.
12. Hårdemark, E. (1989). Tema teknik. Sammanställnig av project med stöd av socialdepartment. Stockholm: Socialdepartment och Barnmiljörådet i Sverige.
13. Holt, B.-G. (1989). Science with young children (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: NAEYC.
14. Huston, A. C. (1983). Sex-typing. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. IV, pp. 387-467). New York: Wiley.
15. MacNaughton, G. (2004). Gender-neu gedacht in der Pädagogk der frühen Kindheit. In W. E. Fthenakis & P. Oberhuemer (Eds.), Frühpädagogik international, Bildungsqualität im Blickpunkt (pp. 345-358). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
16. Maslow, A. (1954/1987). Motivation and personality (3rd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.
17. Mitchham, C. (1994). Thinking through technology. The path between engineering and philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago.
18. Oberhuemer, P. (2004). Bildungskonzepte für die frühen Jahre in internationaler Perspektive. In W. E. Fthenakis & P. Oberhuemer (Eds.), Frühpädagogik international, Bildungsqualität im Blickpunkt (pp. 359-386). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
19. E Parkinson 1999 Talking technology: Language and literacy in the primary school examined through children's encounters with mechanism Journal of Technology Education 11 1 60 73
20. Rasinen, A. (2000). Developing technology education: in search of curriculum elements for Finnish general education schools. Jyväskylä Studies in Education, Psychology and Social Research, 171 p. University of Jyväskylä, Retrieved 20 August 2008 from http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:951- 39-2401-7.
21. Ross, C., & Browne, N. (1993). Girls as constructors in the early years. Promoting equal opportunities in maths, science and technology. Staffordshire: Trentham.
22. Rubin, K., Fein, G., & Vandenberg, B. (1983). Play. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (4th ed., pp. 693-774). New York: Wiley.
23. Schoultz, J. (1997). Pupils talk and write about simple mechanisms. In R. Ager & C. Benson (Eds.), International primary design and technology conference-a celebration of good practices (Vol. 2, pp. 26-30). Birmingham, UK: UCE.
24. Singer, D. G., & Revenson, T. A. (1978). A Piaget primer. How a child thinks. New York, London, Auckland: Penguin Books.
25. K Stables 1997 Critical issues to consider when introducing technology education into the curriculum of young learners Journal of Technology Education 8 2 50 65
26. Standards for technological literacy. (2000). Content for the study of technology. Reston, Virginia: International Technology Education Association.
27. Trautner, H. M. (1997). Lehrbuch der Entwicklungspsychologie. Göttingen et al.: Hogrefe.
28. Van Hoorn, J., Monighan-Nourot, P., Scales, B., & Rodriqgues-Alward, K. (2007). Play at the center of the curriculum (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey; Columbus, Ohio: Pearson Prentice Hall.