Predicting the distributions of marine organisms at the global scale

Ecological Modelling

Volumn 221, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 467-478

  Ready, Jonathan ^a   Kaschner, Kristin ^b   South, Andy B ^c   Eastwood, Paul D ^c   Rees, Tony ^d   Rius, Josephine ^e   Agbayani, Eli ^e   Kullander, Sven ^f   Froese, Rainer ^g  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PARÁ   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^c CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENT   (United Kingdom)

^d CSIRO   (Australia)

^e WORLDFISH   (Malaysia)

^f SWEDISH MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY   (Sweden)

^g GEOMAR HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR OCEAN RESEARCH KIEL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Expert review; Global marine biodiversity; Model comparison; Range maps; Species distribution modelling; Trawl surveys

Indexed keywords

GLOBAL MARINES; MODEL COMPARISON; RANGE MAPS; SPECIES DISTRIBUTION MODELLING; TRAWL SURVEYS;

BIODIVERSITY; FISHERIES; MARINE BIOLOGY;

SURVEYS;

ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION; AQUATIC ORGANISM; BIOLOGICAL SURVEY; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION; HABITAT USE; MAPPING METHOD; MARINE ECOSYSTEM;

EID: 72149084145     PISSN: 03043800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.10.025     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Anderson R.P., Lew D., and Peterson A.T. Evaluating predictive models of species' distributions: criteria for selecting optimal models. Ecol. Model. 162 (2003) 211-232 10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00349-6
2. Balmford A., Bennun L., ten Brink B., Cooper D., Côté I.M., Crane P., Dobson A., Dudley N., Dutton I., Green R.E., Gregory R.D., Harrison J., Kennedy E.T., Kremen C., Leader-Williams N., Lovejoy T.E., Mace G., May R., Mayaux P., Morling P., Phillips J., Redford K., Ricketts T.H., Rodríguez J.P., Sanjayan M., Schei P.J., van Jaarsveld A.S., and Walther B.A. The convention on biological diversity's 2010 target. Science 307 (2005) 212-213 10.1126/science.1106281
3. Carr M.-E., Friedrichs A.M., Schmeltz M., Aita M.N., Antoine D., Arrigo K.R., Asanuma I., Aumont O., Barber R., Behrenfeld M., Bidigare R., Buitenhuis E.T., Campbell J., Ciotti A., Dierssen H., Dowell M., Dunne J., Esaias W., Gentili B., Gregg W., Groom S., Hoepffner N., Ishizaka J., Kameda T., Le Quéré C., Lohrenz S., Marra J., Mélin F., Moore K., Morel A., Reddy T.E., Ryan J., Scardi M., Smyth T., Turpie K., Tilstone G., Waters K., and Yamanaka Y. A comparison of global estimates of marine primary production from ocean color. Deep-Sea Res., II 53 (2006) 741-770
4. Cavalieri, D., Parkinson, C., Gloersen, P., Zwally. H.J., 1996 (updated 2006). Sea ice concentrations from Nimbus-7 SMMR and DMSP SSM/I passive microwave data, [1979-2002]. Boulder, Colorado USA: National Snow and Ice Data Center. Digital media.
5. CEFAS, 2007. Centre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science (Cefas) Web service. Data, Fisheries Information, Surveys http://www.cefas.co.uk/data/fisheries-information/surveys.aspx. Accessed December 2007.
6. Compagno, L.J.V., 1984. FAO species catalogue Vol.4. Sharks of the world. An Annotated and Illustrated Catalogue of Shark Species Known to Date Part 1 - Hexanchiformes to Lamniformes. FAO Fish. Synop., 125, Part 1.
7. Conkright M.E., Locarnini R.A., Garcia H.E., O'Brien T.D., Boyer T.P., Stephens C., and Antonov J.I. World Ocean Atlas 2001: objective analyses, data statistics, and figures CD-ROM documentation (2002), U.S. National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration, National Oceanographic Data Center, Silver Spring, MD p. 17
8. Ekman S. Zoogeography of the Sea (1967), Sidgwick & Jackson, London
9. Elith J., Graham C.H., Anderson R.P., Dudik M., Ferrier S., Guisan A., Hijmans R.J., Huettmann F., Leathwick J.R., Lehmann A., Li J., Lohmann L.G., Loiselle B.A., Manion G., Moritz C., Nakamura M., Nakazawa Y., Overton J.Mc.C., Peterson A.T., Phillips S.J., Richardson K., Scachetti-Pereira R., Schapire R.E., Soberón J., Williams S., Wisz M.S., and Zimmermann N.E. Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 29 (2006) 129-151
10. Fielding A.H., and Bell J.F. A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Env. Cons. 24 1 (1997) 38-49
11. Froese, R., Pauly, D., 2007. FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication. http://www.fishbase.org. Version 01/2007.
12. GBIF, 2007. Global Biodiversity Information Facility. World Wide Web electronic publication http://www.gbif.org/. Accessed December 2007.
13. Gowans S. Bottlenose Whales - Hyperoodon ampullus and H. planifrons. In: Perrin W.F., Würsig B., and Thewissen J.G.M. (Eds). Encyclopedia of Marine Mammals (2002), Academic Press, San Diego, CA 128-129
14. Grant W.S., Clark A.M., and Bowen B.W. Why restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of mitochondrial DNA failed to resolve sardine (Sardinops) biogeography: insights from mitochondrial DNA cytochrome b sequences. Can. J. Fish Aquat. Sci. 55 12 (1998) 2539-2547
15. Guisan A., and Thuiller W. Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecol. Lett. 8 (2005) 993-1009
16. Hammond P.S., Berggren P., Benke H., Borchers D.L., Collet A., Heide-Jorgensen M.P., Heimlich S., Hiby A.R., Leopold M.F., and Øien N. Abundance of harbour porpoise and other cetaceans in the North Sea and adjacent waters. J. Appl. Ecol. 39 (2002) 361-376
17. Hastie T.J. Generalized additive models. In: Chambers J.M., and Hastie T.J. (Eds). Statistical Models (1991), S, Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole Chapter 7
18. Hernandez P.A., Graham C.H., Máster L.L., and Albert D.L. The effect of sample size and species characteristics on performance of different species distribution modelling methods. Ecography 29 (2006) 773-785
19. IWC (International Whaling Commission), 2001. IDCR-DESS SOWER survey data set (1978-2001). IWC, Cambridge.
20. Johnson C.J., and Gillingham M.P. Mapping uncertainty: sensitivity of wildlife habitat ratings to expert opinion. J. Appl. Ecol. 41 (2004) 1032-1041
21. Kasamatsu F., Matsuoka K., and Hakamada T. Interspecific relationships in density among the whale community in the Antarctic. Polar Biol. 23 (2000) 466-473
22. Kaschner K., Watson R., Trites A.W., and Pauly D. Mapping world wide distributions of marine mammal species using a relative environmental suitability (RES) model. MEPS 316 (2006) 285-310
23. Lobo J.M., Jiménez-Valverde A., and Real R. AUC: a misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 17 (2008) 145-151
24. MacLeod C.D., and D'Amico A. A review of beaked whale behaviour and ecology in relation to assessing and mitigating impacts of anthropogenic noise. J. Cetacean Res. Manage. 7 (2006) 211-221
25. MacLeod C.D., Mandleberg L., Schweder C., Bannon S.M., and Pierce G.J. A comparison of approaches for modelling the occurrence of marine animals. Hydrobiologia 612 (2008) 21-32 10.1007/s10750-008-9491-0
26. MarLIN, 2007. CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research (CMAR) Laboratories Information Network http://www.marine.csiro.au/marlin/Accessed December 2007.
27. McCullagh P., and Nelder J.A. Generalized Linear Models (1989), Chapman and Hall
28. McPherson J.M., Jetz W., and Rogers D.J. The effects of species' range sizes on the accuracy of distribution models: ecological phenomenon or statistical artefact?. J Appl. Ecol. 41 (2004) 811-823
29. Meier R., and Dikow T. Significance of specimen databases from taxonomic revisions for estimating and mapping the global species diversity of invertebrates and repatriating reliable specimen data. Cons. Biol. 18 2 (2004) 478-488
30. Muñoz, M.E.S., Scachetti-Pereira, R., De Giovanni, R., Sutton, T., Ruland, K., Brewer, P., Oberender, J., Elwertowski, T., Jardim, A.C., Bellini, D.J.S., Cheng-Tao, L., 2007. openModeller. http://openmodeller.sf.net. Version 1.0.4 Accessed 26/01/07
31. NOAA, 2006. ETOPO2 v2 global gridded 2-minute database. U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information Service, National Geophysical Data Center. http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/mgg/image/2minrelief.html. Accessed December 2007.
32. NOAA, 2007. NOAA optimum interpolation sea surface temperature analysis. U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Centre for Environmental Prediction. http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/research/cmb/sst_analysis. Accessed December 2007.
33. OBIS, 2007. Ocean Biogeographic Information System. http://www.iobis.org. Accessed December 2007.
34. Pearce J.L., and Boyce M.S. Modelling distribution and abundance with presence-only data. J. Appl. Ecol. 43 (2006) 405-412
35. Phillips S.J., Anderson R.P., and Schapire R.E. Maximum entropy modelling of species geographic distributions. Ecol. Model. 190 (2006) 231-259
36. Phillips, S.J., 2008. Transferability, sample selection bias and background data in presence-only modelling: a response to Peterson et al. (2007). Ecography OnlineEarly doi:10.1111/j.2007.0906-7590.05378.x.
37. Rees T. C-squares, a new spatial indexing system and its applicability to the description of oceanographic datasets. Oceanography 16 (2003) 11-19
38. Reynolds R.W., and Smith T.M. A high-resolution global sea surface temperature climatology. J. Climate 8 (1995) 1571-1583
39. Rogers S.I. Environmental factors affecting the distribution of sole (Solea solea (L.)) within a nursery area. Neth. J. Sea Res. 29 (1992) 153-161
40. Sing T., Sander O., Beerenwinkel N., and Lengauer T. ROCR: visualizing classifier performance in R. Bioinformatics 21 (2005) 3940-3941
41. Siqueira M.F., and Durigan G. Modelagem da distribuição geográfica de espécies lenhosas de cerrado no Estado de São Paulo. Revista Brasileira de Botânica 30 (2007) 239-249
42. Stockwell D.R.B., and Peterson A.T. Effects of sample size on accuracy of species distribution models. Ecol. Model. 148 (2002) 1-13
43. Swets J.A. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240 (1988) 1285-1293