Private valuation of carbon sequestration in forest plantations

Ecological Economics

Volumn 69, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 451-458

  Guitart, A Bussoni ^a   Rodriguez, L C Estraviz ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE LA REPÚBLICA   (Uruguay)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Carbon; Cost; Eucalyptus; LEV; Supply

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON EMISSION; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; EMISSION CONTROL; EMISSIONS TRADING; EVERGREEN FOREST; KYOTO PROTOCOL; LANDOWNER; PLANTATION FORESTRY; SILVICULTURE; VALUATION;

BAHIA; BRAZIL; SOUTH AMERICA;

EUCALYPTUS;

EID: 72149083878     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.10.005     Document Type: Short Survey

References (38)

1. Benítez P., and Obersteiner M. Site identification for carbon sequestration in Latin America: a grid-based economic approach. Forest Policy and Economics 8 6 (2005) 636-651
2. Brown S., Masera O., and Sathaye J. Project-based activities. In: Watson R.T., Noble I.R., Bolin B., Ravindranath N.H., Verardo D.J., and Dokken D.J. (Eds). IPCC Special Report. Land Use, Land-use Change, and Forestry (2000), Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK 283-338
3. Carvalho A.M., and Camargo F.R.A. Variação da densidade básica entre procedências e progênies de Eucalyptus saligna. O papel. 57 69 (1996) 56-59
4. CCE, 2006. Chicago Climate Exchange CCX Market Report. v.iii(1). http://www.chicagoclimateexchange.com/docs/publications/CM_060201.pdf. (1 February 2006).
5. Commercial Property Finance Brokers, 2002. Structured finance. http://www.clpuk.com/swap_frame.htm (5 July 2009).
6. 9 Report of the Conference of the Parties on its Ninth Session, held at Milan, 1-12 December 2003. http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/cop9/06a02.pdf (5 July 2009).
7. Creedy J., and Wurzbacher A. The economic value of a forested catchment with timber, water and carbon sequestration benefits. Ecological Economics 38 1 (2001) 71-83
8. De Jong B.H.J., Tipper R., and Montoya Gómez G. An economic analysis of the potential for carbon sequestration by forests: evidence from southern Mexico. Ecological Economics 33 2 (2000) 313-327
9. Díaz Balteiro L., and Romero C. Forest management and carbon captured: analytical aspects and policy implications. Investigación Agropecuaria: Sistemas de Recursos Forestales, Fuera de Serie. 1 (2001) 153-165
10. Dutschke, M., Schlamadinger, B., 2003. Practical Isuues Concerning Temporary carbon credits in the CDM. Hamburg Institute of International Economics, HWWA Discussion Paper 227.
11. ECE, 2006. European Climate Exchange. ECX EUA Futures Contract: Historic Data 2006 In tonnes of CO2 (EU Allowances). http://www.ecx.eu/index.php/EUA-Futures (5 July 2009).
12. Faustmann M. Berechnung des Werthes, welchen Waldboden, sowie noch nicht haubare Holzbestände für die Waldwirthschaft besitzen. Allg. Forst-u. J. Ztg. 20 (1849) 441-455
13. Fearnside P. Global warming response options in Brazil's forest sector: comparison of project-level costs and benefits. Biomass and Bioenergy 8 5 (1995) 309-322
14. Feng H., 2002. The dynamics of carbon sequestration and measures of cost-effectiveness. Iowa State University. (Working Paper, 02-WP 320) http://www.econ.iastate.edu/research/webpapers/paper_10107.pdf (5 July 2009).
15. Gompertz B. On the nature of the function expressive of the law of human mortality, and on a new mode of determining the value of life contingencies. Philosophical Transactions 123 (1832) 513-585
16. 2 sequestration. In: Conference of Environmental Economics, 5., Ulvön, 1998. Anais. Ulvön: SLU.
17. Hoen H.F., and Solberg B. Potential and economic efficiency of carbon sequestration in forest biomass through silvicultural management. Forest Science 4 3 (1994) 429-451
18. Huang C., and Kronrad G.G. The cost of sequestering carbon on private forest lands. Forest Policy and Economics 2 (2001) 133-142
19. Instituto Pesquisas Econômicas-IPEA, 2003. Ipeadata. http://www.ipeadata.gov.br (5 July 2008).
20. Karmacharya S.B., and Singh K.P. Biomass and net production of teak plantations in a dry tropical region in India. Forest Ecology and Management 55 (1992) 233-247
21. Knoke T., and Weber M. Expanding carbon stocks in existing forests-a methodological approach for coast appraisal at the enterprise level. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 11 (2006) 579-605
22. Lewis D.K., Turner D.P., and Winjum J.K. An inventory-based procedure to estimate economic cost of forest management on a regional scale to conserve and sequester atmospheric carbon. Ecological Economics 16 1 (1996) 35-49
23. Li Z., Apps M.J., Banfield E., and Kurz W.A. Estimating net primary production of forests in the Canadian Prairie Provinces using an inventory-based carbon budget model. Canadian Journal of Forestry Research 32 1 (2002) 161-169
24. Moulton, R.J., Richards, K.R., 1990. Costs of sequestering carbon through tree planting and forest management in the United States. Washington: Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Dec. 1990. 47p. General Technical Report, 58.
25. Nordhaus W.D. The cost of slowing climate change: a survey. Energy Journal 12 1 (1991) 37-65
26. Paul K.I., Polglase P.J., and Nyakuengama J.G. Change in soil carbon following afforestation. Forest Ecology and Management 168 (2002) 241-257
27. Plantinga A.J., Mauldin T., and Miller D. An econometric analysis of the costs of sequestering carbon in forests. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81 4 (1999) 812-824
28. Richards K., and Stokes C. A review of carbon sequestration cost studies: a dozen years of research. Climatic Change 63 (2004) 1-48
29. Romero C. Economía de los Recursos Ambientales y Naturales. second ed. (1994), Alianza, Madrid
30. Romero C. Multicriteria decision analysis and environmental economics: an approximation. European Journal of Operational Research 96 1 (1996) 81-99
31. Romero C., Ros V., and Díaz Balteiro L. Optimal forest rotation age when carbon captured is considered: theory and applications. Journal of the Operational Research Society 49 (1998) 121-131
32. Samuelson P.A. Economics of forestry in an evolving society. Economic Inquiry 14 (1976) 466-492
33. Stape, J.L., 2002. Production ecology of clonal eucalyptus plantations in northeastern Brazil. Fort Collins. 237p. Thesis (PhD)-Colorado State University.
34. UNIT, 2006. Gestión Forestal Sostenible. Norma UNIT 1152: 2006. 19 p. http://www.unit.org.uy/catalogo/detalle.php?idC=1845&resaltar (5 July 2009).
35. URUGUAY (2002) Ministerio de Vivienda, Ordenamiento Territorial y Medio Ambiente. Dirección de Medio Ambiente, Unidad de Cambio Climático. Estudio de apoyo a la aplicación del mecanismo para el desarrollo limpio del protocolo de Kioto en Uruguay. Montevideo, MVOTMA. 164p.
36. Van Kooten G.C., Binkley C.S., and Delcourt G. Effect of carbon taxes and subsidies on optimal forest rotation age and supply of carbon services. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77 2 (1995) 365-374
37. Vital B.R., Bastos Filho J.G., and Valente O.F. Efeito da idade da árvore sobre o rendimento gravimétrico e teor de carbono fixo de carvão de Eucalyptus. Revista Árvore 9 2 (1985) 180-185
38. WORLD BANK, 2003. Prototype Carbon Found-PCF. Prototypecarbonfund. http://wbcarbonfinance.org/Router.cfm?Page=PCF (5 July 2009).