Using DInSAR, airborne LiDAR, and archival air photos to quantify landsliding and sediment transport

Geophysical Research Letters

Volumn 36, Issue 19, 2009, Pages

  Roering, Joshua J ^a   Stimely, Laura L ^a   Mackey, Benjamin H ^a   Schmidt, David A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIRBORNE LIDAR; CALIFORNIA; D-INSAR; DENUDATION RATES; DOWNSLOPE; FLUVIAL CHANNELS; INTERFEROGRAMS; LANDSCAPE EVOLUTIONS; LANDSLIDING; REMOTE SENSING TOOLS; RIVER CATCHMENT; TRANSPORT ZONE;

CATCHMENTS; EROSION; OPTICAL RADAR; REMOTE SENSING; SEDIMENT TRANSPORT; SEDIMENTOLOGY;

LANDSLIDES;

AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH; DISPLACEMENT; EROSION RATE; GULLY; LANDSCAPE EVOLUTION; LANDSLIDE; LIDAR; SATELLITE IMAGERY; SEDIMENT TRANSPORT;

CALIFORNIA; EEL BASIN; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 72049111475     PISSN: 00948276     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2009GL040374     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Baum, R. L., et al. (1998), Surface deformation as a guide to kinematics and three-dimensional shape of slow-moving, clay-rich landslides, Honolulu, Hawaii, Environ. Eng. Geosci., 4, 283-306.
2. Brown, W. M., and J. R. Ritter (1971), Sediment transport and turbidity in the Eel River basin, California, U.S. Geol. Surv. Water Supply Pap., 1986, 67.
3. Bulmer, M. H., D. N. Petley, W. Murphy, and F. Mantovani (2006), Detecting slope deformation using two-pass differential interferometry: Implications for landslide studies on Earth and other planetary bodies, J. Geophys. Res., 111, E06S16, doi:10.1029/2005JE002593.
4. Catani, F., et al. (2005), On the application of SAR interferometry to geomorphological studies: Estimation of landform attributes and mass movements, Geomorphology, 66, 119-131, doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.08.012. (Pubitemid 40350804)
5. Chandler, J. H., and D. Brunsden (1995), Steady state behaviour of the Black Ven mudslide: The application of archival analytical photogrammetry to studies of landform change, Earth Surf. Processes Landforms, 20, 255-275, doi:10.1002/esp.3290200307.
6. Coe, J., et al. (2009), Basal-topographic control of stationary ponds on a continuously moving landslide, Earth Surf. Processes Landforms, 34, 264-279, doi:10.1002/esp.1721.
7. Delacourt, C., et al. (2007), Remote-sensing techniques for analysing landslide kinematics: a review, Bull. Soc. Geol. Fr., 178, 89-100, doi:10.2113/gssgfbull.178.2.89. (Pubitemid 46784352)
8. Guzzetti, F., et al. (2009), Landslide volumes and landslide mobilization rates in Umbria, central Italy, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 279, 222-229.
9. Hilley, G. E., et al. (2004), Dynamics of slow-moving landslides from permanent scatterer analysis, Science, 304, 1952-1955, doi:10.1126/science. 1098821.
10. Hovius, N., et al. (1997), Sediment flux from a mountain belt derived by landslide mapping, Geology, 25, 231-234, doi:10.1130/0091-7613(1997)025<0231: SFFAMB>2.3.CO;2. (Pubitemid 27436685)
11. Iverson, R. M. (1987), Rainfall, ground-water flow, and seasonal movement at Minor Creek landslide, northwestern California: Physical interpretation of empirical relations, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 99, 579-594, doi:10.1130/0016- 7606(1987)99<579:RGFASM>2.0.CO;2.
12. Kelsey, H. M. (1978), Earthflows in Franciscan melange, Van Duzen River basin, California, Geology, 6, 361-364.
13. Kelsey, H. M. (1987), Geomorphic processes in the recently uplifted coast ranges of northern California, in Geomorphic Systems of North America, edited by W. L. Graf, pp. 550-560, Geol. Soc. of Am., Denver, Colo.
14. Korup, O., et al. (2007), Giant landslides, topography, and erosion, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 261, 578-589, doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2007.07.025.
15. Mackey, B., et al. (2009), Long-term kinematics and sediment flux of an active earthflow, Eel River, California, Geology, 37, 803-806.
16. Malet, J.-P., et al. (2002), The use of Global Positioning System for the continuous monitoring of landslides: Application to the Super-Sauze earthflow (Alpes-de-Haute-Provence, France), Geomorphology, 43, 33-54, doi:10.1016/S0169-555X(01)00098-8.
17. Malet, J.-P., et al. (2005), Triggering conditions and mobility of debris flows associated to complex earthflows, Geomorphology, 66, 215-235, doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.09.014.
18. Massonnet, D., and K. L. Feigl (1998), Radar interferometry and its application to changes in the Earth's surface, Rev. Geophys., 36, 441-500. (Pubitemid 29083897)
19. McLaughlin, R. J., et al. (1982), Post-middle Miocene accretion of Franciscan rocks, northwestern California, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 93, 595-605, doi:10.1130/0016-7606(1982)93<595:PMAOFR>2.0.CO;2.
20. Nolan, K. M., and R. J. Janda (1995), Movement and sediment yield of two earthflows, northwestern California, in Geomorphic Processes and Aquatic Habitat in the Redwood Creek Basin, Northwestern California, edited by K. M. Nolan et al., U. S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap., 1454-F, F1-F12.
21. Rosen, P. A., et al. (2004), Updated repeat orbit interferometry package released, Eos Trans. AGU, 85, doi:10.1029/2004EO050004.
22. Sandwell, D. T., et al. (2008), Accuracy and resolution of ALOS interferometry: Vector deformation maps of the Father's Day intrusion at Kilauea, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 46, 3524-3534, doi:10.1109/TGRS.2008. 2000634.
23. Schwab, M., et al. (2008), Landsliding and sediment flux in the Central Swiss Alps: A photogrammetric study of the Schimbrig landslide, Entlebuch, Geomorphology, 97, 392-406, doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2007.08.019.
24. Slatton, K. C., W. E. Carter, R. L. Shrestha, and W. Dietrich (2007), Airborne laser swath mapping: Achieving the resolution and accuracy required for geosurficial research, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L23S10, doi:10.1029/ 2007GL031939.
25. Squarzoni, C., et al. (2003), Nine years of spatial and temporal evolution of the La Valette landslide observed by SAR interferometry, Eng. Geol., 68, 53-66, doi:10.1016/S0013-7952(02)00198-9. (Pubitemid 36175246)
26. Zebker, H. A., P. A. Rosen, and S. Hensley (1997), Atmospheric effects in interferometric synthetic aperture radar surface deformation and topographic maps, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 7547-7563, doi:10.1029/96JB03804. (Pubitemid 27436704)