Coding of information in limit cycle oscillators

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 103, Issue 24, 2009, Pages

  Schleimer, Jan Hendrik ^a,b,d   Stemmler, Martin ^a,c  

^a BERNSTEIN CENTER FOR COMPUTATIONAL NEUROSCIENCE   (Germany)

^b HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^d Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIRECT LINKS; DRIVING FORCES; EXTERNAL FORCE; GENERAL DESCRIPTION; HEART CELLS; LIMIT-CYCLE OSCILLATORS; LINEAR RESPONSE; MUTUAL INFORMATIONS; OSCILLATOR FREQUENCY; PHASE RESPONSE CURVES; TIME VARYING; ZERO-CROSSINGS;

BIOINFORMATICS; GRAPH THEORY; TIME SERIES;

OSCILLATORS (ELECTRONIC);

EID: 72049102920     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: 10797114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.248105     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. K. Yoshimura and K. Arai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 154101 (2008); PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.154101
2. J.N. Teramae, H. Nakao, and G.B. Ermentrout, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 194102 (2009); PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.194102
3. Y. Kuramoto, Chemical Oscillations, Waves, and Turbulence (Springer, New York, 1984).
4. To phase-average the noise, the method of averaging is applied to the full Fokker-Planck equation (FPE) associated with Eq. d2. If we change to a moving reference frame Φ=φ+ψ with φ̇= ω̄+εZ(φ)x(t), we can derive the FPE for the density (ψ,t). If σ□1, (ψ,t) varies slowly compared to the oscillation period, hence we can average the diffusion coefficient, as in H. Nakao, K. Arai, and Y. Kawamura, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 184101 (2007). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.184101
5. P. Dayan and L.F. Abbott, Theoretical Neuroscience (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2001), p. 20.
6. G.B. Ermentrout, R.F. Galán, and N.N. Urban, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 248103 (2007). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.248103
7. F. Gabbiani and C. Koch, in Methods in Neuronal Modeling: From Ions to Networks (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1998);
8. B. Lindner, M.J. Chacron, and A. Longtin, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1539-3755 72, 021911 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevE.72.021911
9. H.C. Tuckwell, Introduction to Theoretical Neurobiology II (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1988).
10. J. Franklin and W. Bair, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 55, 1074 (1995). SMJMAP 0036-1399 10.1137/S0036139993258691
11. E. Brown, J. Moehlis, and P. Holmes, Neural Comput. 16, 673 (2004). NEUCEB 0899-7667 10.1162/089976604322860668
12. A. Abouzeid and B. Ermentrout, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1539-3755 80, 011911 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevE.80.011911
13. T. Tateno and H. Robinson, Biophys. J. 92, 683 (2007). BIOJAU 0006-3495 10.1529/biophysj.106.088021
14. K. Ota, M. Nomura, and T. Aoyagi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 024101 (2009). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.024101
15. B. Naundorf, T. Geisel, and F. Wolf, J. Comput. Neurosci. 18, 297 (2005). JCNEFR 0929-5313 10.1007/s10827-005-0329-8
16. J.N. Teramae and D. Tanaka, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 204103 (2004); PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.204103
17. D.S. Goldobin and A. Pikovsky, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1539-3755 71, 045201(R) (2005); 10.1103/PhysRevE.71.045201
18. R. Galán, B. Ermentrout, and N. Urban, J. Neurophysiol. JONEA4 0022-3077 99, 277 (2007). 10.1152/jn.00563.2007
19. M. Rabinovich, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 068102 (2001). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.068102
20. M. Timme, Europhys. Lett. 76, 367 (2006); EULEEJ 0295-5075 10.1209/epl/i2006-10289-y
21. M. Timme, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 224101 (2007). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.224101
22. J.N. Teramae and T. Fukai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 248105 (2008). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.248105
23. G.T. Kenyon, arXive:0709.1947.