Supply chain purchasing risk evaluation of manufacturing enterprise based on Fuzzy-AHP method

2009 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Computing Technology and Automation, ICICTA 2009

Volumn 3, Issue , 2009, Pages 1001-1005

  Nan, Jiang ^a   Huo, Jia Zhen ^a   Liu, Hao Hua ^b  

^a TONGJI UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b JIANGXI UNIVERSITY OF FINANCE AND ECONOMICS   (China)

Author keywords

Fuzzy AHP; Manufacturing enterprise; Supply chain purchasing

Indexed keywords

FUZZY AHP; FUZZY ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; MANUFACTURING ENTERPRISE; RISK EVALUATION; TECHNOLOGICAL IMPROVEMENTS;

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; COMPUTER SCIENCE; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; MANUFACTURE; SALES; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; SUPPLY CHAINS;

INTELLIGENT COMPUTING;

EID: 72049087766     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICICTA.2009.707     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Thomas L. Saaty. Risk-Its Priority and Probability: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Risk Analysis Volume 7 Issue 2, 1987, Pages 159-172
2. Van P J M, Aarhoven and W, Pedrycz.A Fuzzy Extension of Saaty's Priority Theory.Fuzzy Sets and Systems 1983, 11(3):229-241
3. Chan, F. T. S., Jiang, B., & Tang, N. K. H. The development of intelligent decision support tools to aid the design of flexible manufacturing systems.International Journal of Production Economics, 2000, 65, 73-84.
4. Ariel, S., & Reich, Y. Improving the robustness of multicriteria decision making. In Proceedings of international conference on engineering design, Stockholm.2003, August 19-21.
5. Wood, W. H., & Agogino, A. M. Decision-based conceptual design: modeling and navigating heterogeneous design spaces. ASME Journal of mechanical design, 2005, 127(1), 2-11.
6. Ullman, D. G. Toward the ideal mechanical engineering design support system. Research Engineering Design, 2002, 13(2), 55-64.
7. W. Pedrycz, P.J.M. Laarhoven, A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 11 (3) (1983) 229-241.
8. D.Y. Chang, Application of extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP, European Journal of Operation Research 95 (1996) 649-655.
9. C.H. Ching, Evaluating naval tactical missile systems by fuzzy AHP based on the grade value of membership function, European Journal of Operation Research 6(2) (1997) 343-350.
10. Cebeci, U., & Ruan, D. A multi-attribute comparison of Turkish quality consultants by fuzzy AHP. International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, 2007 6(1), 191-207
11. Jaganathan, S., Erinjeri, J. J., & Ker, J. I. Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process based group decision support system to select and evaluate new manufacturing technologies. International Journal of advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2007, 32, 1253-1262.
12. Te-Sheng Li, Hsing-Hsin Huang. Applied TRIZ and Fuzzy AHP to develop innovative design for automated manufacturing systems. Expert Systems with Applications 36 (2009) 8302-8312.
13. Smallman C. Risk and organization behavior: a research model. Disaster Prevention and Management, 1996, 5(2):12-26
14. Smeltzer L R and Siferd S P. Proactive supply management: the management of risk. International Journal of Purchasing and Material Management, 1998, 34 (1):3 8-45
15. Johnson M E. Learning from toys: lessons in managing supply chain risk from toy industry. California Management Review, 2001, 43(3): 106-124
16. Zsidisin, George A., Managerial perception of supply risk. The Journal of Supply Chain Management, Tempe, Winter, 2003, 14-25
17. Ma Xiao Yan. A simplified Rank Method of triangular fuzzy number complimentary matrix with probability. Journal of Shandong Agricultural University(science edition), 2(X)3, 34(4):565-567