A probabilistic load flow calculation method with latin hypercube sampling

Dianli Xitong Zidonghua/Automation of Electric Power Systems

Volumn 33, Issue 21, 2009, Pages

  Yu, Han ^a,b   Chung, Chiyong ^b   Wong, Kitpo ^b   Zhang, Jianhua ^a  

^a NORTH CHINA ELECTRIC POWER UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Latin hypercube sampling; Monte Carlo simulation; Probabilistic load flow calculation

Indexed keywords

BUS SYSTEMS; COMPARATIVE TESTS; COMPUTATIONAL COSTS; COMPUTATIONAL SPEED; IEEE 118-BUS SYSTEM; INPUT SPACE; LATIN HYPERCUBE SAMPLING; MONTE CARLO SIMULATION; MONTE CARLO SIMULATION METHODS; PROBABILISTIC LOAD FLOW; SAMPLE SIZES; SAMPLING EFFICIENCY; SAMPLING METHOD; SIMPLE RANDOM SAMPLING; STATISTICAL PARAMETERS; STOCHASTIC PROBLEMS; STOCHASTIC VARIABLE;

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COSMIC RAY DETECTORS; COST REDUCTION; ELECTRIC LOAD FLOW; FLOW SIMULATION; GEOMETRY; MONTE CARLO METHODS; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; RANDOM PROCESSES; RANDOM VARIABLES; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS; SYSTEMS ENGINEERING;

SAMPLING;

EID: 71949112474     PISSN: 10001026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. BORKOWSKA B. Probabilistic load flow. IEEE Trans on Power Apparatus and Systems, 1974, 93(3): 752-759.
2. SONG Xiaotong, TAN Zhenyu. Power system reliability evaluation based on optimal sampling and selective analysis algorithm. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2009, 33(5): 29-33.
3. CUI Yali, BIE Zhaohong, WANG Xifan. Study on probabilistic models and algorithms of available transfer capacity. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2003, 27(14): 36-40.
4. BIE Zhaohong, WANG Xifan. The application of Monte Carlo method to reliability evaluation of power systems. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 1997, 21(6): 68-75.
5. WANG Chengshan, XIE Yinghua, CUI Kuntai. Distribution system reliability evaluation based on zone non-sequential simulation. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2005, 29(14): 39-43.
6. JIRUTITIJAROEN P, SINGH C. Comparison of simulation methods for power system reliability indexes and their distributions. IEEE Trans on Power Systems, 2008, 23(2): 486-493.
7. MCKAY M D, BECKMAN R J, CONOVER W J. A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics, 1979, 21(2): 239-245.
8. OWEN A B. Controlling correlations in Latin hypercube samples. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1994, 89: 1517-1522.
9. IMAN R L. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis for computer modeling applications//Proceedings of the Winter Annual Meeting of ASME, November 8-3, 1992, Anaheim, CA, USA: 153-168.
10. IMAN R L, CONOVER W J. Small sample sensitivity analysis techniques for computer models with an application to risk assessment. Communications in Statistics: Part A Theory and Methods, 1980, 49(17): 1749-1842.
11. MORALES J M, PEREZ-RUIZ J. Point estimate schemes to solve the probabilistic power flow. IEEE Trans on Power Systems, 2007, 22(4): 1594-1601.
12. ALLAN R N, AL-SHAKARCHI M R G. Probabilistic techniques in AC load-flow analysis. IEE Proceedings: Generation, Transmission & Distribution, 1977, 124(2): 154-160.
13. Power systems test case archive[EB/OL]. [2009-06-12]. http://www.ee.washington.edu/research/pstca.