3D shape and structure retrieval method of mechanical parts based on recursive segmentation

Jixie Gongcheng Xuebao/Journal of Mechanical Engineering

Volumn 45, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 176-183

  Xu, Jinghua ^a   Zhang, Shuyou ^a  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

3D shape and structure retrieval; Design reuse; Full binary tree; Mechanical parts; Recursive segmentation; Similarity comparison

Indexed keywords

3-D SHAPE; BOUNDING BOX; BREATH-FIRST; CALCULATION EFFICIENCY; CHANGE DETECTION; DESIGN EFFICIENCY; DESIGN REUSE; ENGINEERING DESIGN; FEATURE VECTORS; INITIAL POSITION; MECHANICAL PARTS; PROTOTYPE SYSTEM; RECURSIVE ALGORITHMS; RETRIEVAL METHODS; REUSABLE DESIGN; ROOT NODES; SHAPE SIMILARITY; SOLID MODEL; VARIABLE WEIGHT;

BINARY TREES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE REUSABILITY; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; RECURSIVE FUNCTIONS; STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

EID: 71949110337     PISSN: 05776686     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3901/JME.2009.11.176     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Iyer N, Jayanti S, Lou K, et al. Shape-based searching for product lifecycle applications[J]. Computer-Aided Design, 2005, 37(13):1435-1446.
2. Gao W, Gao S M, Liu Y S. Multiresolutional similarity assessment and retrieval of solid models based on DBMS[J]. Computer-Aided Design, 2006, 38(9):985-1001.
3. Papadakis P, Pratikakis I, Perantonis S, et al. Efficient 3D shape matching and retrieval using a concrete radicalized spherical projection representation[J]. Pattern Recognition, 2007, 40(9):2437-2452.
4. Goh W B. Strategies for shape matching using skeletons [J]. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 2008, 110(3):326-345.
5. Chu C H, Hsu Y C. Similarity assessment of 3D mechanical components for design reuse[J]. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 2006, 22(4):332-341.
6. Jain V, Zhang Hao. A spectral approach to shape-based retrieval of articulated 3D models[J]. Computer-Aided Design, 2007, 39(5):398-407.
7. Elad M, Tal A, Ar S. Content based retrieval of VRML objects: An iterative and interactive approach[C]// Proceedings of the Eurographics Multimedia Workshop, Manchester, UK. 2001:97-108.
8. Kazhdan M, Funkhouser T, Rusinkiewicz S. Rotation invariant spherical harmonic representation of 3D shape descriptors[C]//Proceedings of ACM/Eurographics Symposium on Geometry Processing, Aachen, Germany. 2003:167-175.
9. Osada R, Funkhouser T, Chazelle B, et al. Shape distributions[J]. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 2002, 21(4):807-832.
10. Hong T, Lee K, Kim S. Similarity comparison of mechanical parts to reuse existing designs[J]. Computer-Aided Design, 2006, 38(9):973-984.
11. Cyr C M, Kimia B B. 3D object recognition using shape similarity-based aspect graph[C]//Proceedings of the Eighth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Vancouver, Canada. 2001, 1:254-261.
12. Ascher M, Marefat M M, Fasse E. A methodology for automatic retrieval of similarly shaped machinable components[C]//IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Tucson, State Arizona, USA. 2001, 5:2840-2845.
13. El-Mehalawi M, Miller R A. A database system of mechanical components based on geometric and topological similarity. Part I: Representation[J]. Computer Aided Design, 2003, 35(1):83-94.
14. Srinivas G, Fasse E D, Marefat M M. Retrieval of similarly shaped parts from a CAD database[C]//IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, San Diego, CA, USA. 1998, 3:2809-2814.