Legal discovery: Does domain expertise matter?

Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting

Volumn 45, Issue , 2008, Pages

  Efthimiadis, Efthimis N ^a   Hotchkiss, Mary A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 71949102585     PISSN: 15508390     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/meet.2008.14504503126     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (9)

1. Bing, Jon, (1987) Performance of Legal Text Retrieval Systems: The Curse of Boole. Law Library Journal, 79(2), 187-202.
2. Blair, D. (1996). "Stairs Redux: Thoughts on the STAIRS Evaluation, Ten Years after." Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 47 (1): 4-22.
3. Blair, D. (2002). The challenge of commercial document retrieval. Part I: Major issues, and a framework based on search exhaustivity, determinacy of representation and document collection size. Information processing and Management, 38, pp273-291.
4. Blair, D. (2002). The challenge of commercial document retrieval. Part II: a strategy for document searching based on identifiable document partitions. Information processing and Management, 38, pp293-304.
5. Blair, D. and Maron, M.E. An evaluation of retrieval effectiveness for a full-text document retrieval system. Communications of the ACM, 28(3): 285-299, 1985.
6. Dabney, Daniel (1986) The curse of Themus: An Analysis of Full-Text Legal Document Retrieval. Law Library Journal, 78(5), 5-40.
7. Interactive Challenge Task, TREC 2007 Legal Track. http://treclegal. umiacs.umd.edu/interactivetask.html
8. Schweighofer, Erich. The Revolution in Legal Information Retrieval or: The Empire Strikes Back. Journal of Information, Law and Technology (JILT) 1999 (1), available at: http://www2test.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/elj/jilt/1999-1/ schweighofer/
9. TREC 2007 Legal Track. http://trec-legal.umiacs.umd.edu/.