In vivo deformation of the human abdominal aorta and common iliac arteries with hip and knee flexion: Implications for the design of stent-grafts

Journal of Endovascular Therapy

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 531-538

  Choi, Gilwoo ^a   Shin, Lewis K ^b   Taylor, Charles A ^a,b   Cheng, Christopher P ^b  

^a Stanford University   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Abdominal aorta; Common iliac artery; Curvature; Deformation; In vivo study; Strain; Twisting

Indexed keywords

GADOBENATE DIMEGLUMINE;

ABDOMINAL AORTA; ADULT; AORTA BIFURCATION; AORTA GRAFT; ARTICLE; BIOENGINEERING; COMMON ILIAC ARTERY; COMPRESSION; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DEFORMATION; FEMALE; FETUS MOVEMENT; FUNCTIONAL MORPHOLOGY; HIP; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; ILIAC ARTERY; IMAGE PROCESSING; IN VIVO STUDY; KNEE FUNCTION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MUSCULOSKELETAL FUNCTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RENAL ARTERY; STENT; STENT GRAFT; SUPINE POSITION; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADULT; AORTA, ABDOMINAL; BIOMECHANICS; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; FEMALE; HIP JOINT; HUMANS; ILIAC ARTERY; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; KNEE JOINT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; POSTURE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; STENTS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SUPINE POSITION; TORSION, MECHANICAL; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 71949102108     PISSN: 15266028     EISSN: 15451550     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1583/09-2806.1     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Adriaensen ME, Bosch JL, Halpern EF, et al. Elective endovascular versus open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: systematic review of short-term results. Radiology. 2002;224:739-747. (Pubitemid 34919807)
2. Bolke E, Jehle PM, Storck M, et al. Endovascular stent-graft placement versus conventional open surgery in infrarenal aortic aneurysm: a prospective study on acute phase response and clinical outcome. Clin Chim Acta. 2001;314:203-207. (Pubitemid 33079199)
3. Cotroneo AR, Iezzi R, Giancristofaro D, et al. Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: how many patients are eligible for endovascular repair? Radiol Med. 2006;111:597-606.
4. Parodi JC, Marin ML, Veith FJ. Transfemoral, endovascular stented graft repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm. Arch Surg. 1995;130:549-552.
5. Williamson WK, Nicoloff AD, Taylor LM, et al. Functional outcome after open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2001;33:913-920.
6. Jacobs TS, Won J, Gravereaux EC, et al. Mechanical failure of prosthetic human implants: a 10-year experience with aortic stent graft devices. J Vasc Surg. 2003;37:16-26. (Pubitemid 36236939)
7. Krajcer Z, Howell M, Dougherty K. Unusual case of AneuRx stent-graft failure two years after AAA exclusion. J Endovasc Ther. 2001;8:465-471. (Pubitemid 33032460)
8. Dowdall JF, Greenberg RK, West K, et al. Separation of components in fenestrated and branched endovascular grafting-branch protection or a potentially new mode of failure? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008;36:2-9.
9. Zarins CK, Bloch DA, Crabtree T, et al. Stent graft migration after endovascular aneurysm repair: importance of proximal fixation. J Vasc Surg. 2003;38:1264-1272. (Pubitemid 37517655)
10. Beebe HG, Cronenwett JL, Katzen BT, et al. Results of an aortic endograft trial: impact of device failure beyond 12 months. J Vasc Surg. 2001;33:S55-63.
11. Abraham CZ, Chuter TA, Reilly LM, et al. Abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with the Zenith stent graft: short to midterm results. J Vasc Surg. 2002;36:217-225. (Pubitemid 35014950)
12. Abel DB, Beebe HG, Dedashtian MM, et al. Preclinical testing for aortic endovascular grafts: results of a Food and Drug Administration workshop. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35:1022-1028.
13. Abel DB, Dehdashtian MM, Rodger ST, et al. Evolution and future of preclinical testing for endovascular grafts. J Endovasc Ther. 2006;13:649-659.
14. Bargeron CB, Hutchins GM, Moore GW, et al. Distribution of the geometric parameters of human aortic bifurcations. Arteriosclerosis. 1986;6:109-113.
15. O'Flynn PM, O'Sullivan G, Pandit AS. Methods for three-dimensional geometric characterization of the arterial vasculature. Ann Biomed Eng. 2007;35:1368-1381.
16. Sternbergh WC, Money SR, Greenberg RK, et al. Influence of endograft oversizing on device migration, endoleak, aneurysm shrinkage, and aortic neck dilation: results from the Zenith Multicenter Trial. J Vasc Surg. 2004;39:20-26.
17. Draney MT, Alley MT, Tang BT, et al. Importance of 3D nonlinear gradient corrections for quantitative analysis of 3D MR angiographic data. Paper presented at: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine; May 18-24, 2002; Honolulu, HI, USA.
18. Choi G, Cheng CP, Wilson NM, et al. Methods for quantifying three-dimensional deformation of arteries due to pulsatile and nonpulsatile forces: implications for the design of stents and stent grafts. Ann Biomed Eng. 2009;37:14-33.
19. Heikkinen MA, Alsac JM, Arko FR, et al. The importance of iliac fixation in prevention of stent graft migration. J Vasc Surg. 2006;43:1130-1137.
20. Benharash P, Lee JT, Abilez OJ, et al. Iliac fixation inhibits migration of both suprarenal and infrarenal aortic endografts. J Vasc Surg. 2007;45:250-257. (Pubitemid 46149989)
21. Cheng CP, Choi G, Herfkens RJ, et al. The effect of aging on deformations of the superficial femoral artery due to hip and knee flexion: potential clinical implications. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009:ln press.
22. Kadaba MP, Ramakrishnan HK, Wootten ME. Measurement of lower extremity kinematics during level walking. J Orthop Res. 1990;8:383-392.