Raising the standard... to unachievable heights?

Anaesthesia

Volumn 65, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 88-89

  Noblet, J ^a   Plaat, F ^a  

^a HAMMERSMITH HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIAMORPHINE;

ANALGESIA; CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; DISEASE SEVERITY; DOSE RESPONSE; HUMAN; LETTER; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; STANDARD;

ANALGESIA, OBSTETRICAL; BENCHMARKING; CESAREAN SECTION; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; MEDICAL AUDIT; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PREGNANCY;

EID: 71949090134     PISSN: 00032409     EISSN: 13652044     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.06175.x     Document Type: Letter

References (4)

1. Pickering E, Holdcroft A Pain relief after Caesarean section. In: Kinsella M, ed. Raising the Standard: A Compendium of Audit Recipes, 2nd edn. London: Royal College of Anaesthetists, 2006: 168-169 http://www.rcoa.ac.uk/ docs/ARB-section8.pdf (accessed 24/07/09)
2. Halpern S, Yee J, Oliver C, Angle P. Pain relief after Cesarean Section: a prospective cohort study. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 2007; 1: 44214.
3. Wrench IJ, Sanghera S, Pinder A, Power L, Adams MG. Dose response to intrathecal diamorphine for elective caesarean section and compliance with a national audit standard. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia 2007; 16: 17-21. (Pubitemid 44909440)
4. Gould TH, Crosby DL, Harmer M, et al. Policy for controlling pain after surgery: effect of sequential changes in management. British Medical Journal 1992; 305: 1187-1193