A history of entanglement: Decoherence and the interpretation problem

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B - Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 290-302

  Camilleri, Kristian ^a  

^a School of Philosophy Anthropology and Social Inquiry   (Australia)

Author keywords

Copenhagen interpretation; Decoherence; Entanglement; Everett interpretation; Existential interpretation; H. Dieter Zeh; Quantum mechanics; Wojciech Zurek

Indexed keywords

EID: 71849113588     PISSN: 13552198     EISSN: 18792502     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsb.2009.09.003     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. Bacciagaluppi, G. (2007). The role of decoherence in quantum mechanics. In: Zalte, E. N. (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. First published November 3, 2003; substantive revision August 23, 2007. 〈http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qm-decoherence/〉.
2. Beller M. Quantum dialogue: The making of a revolution (1999), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
3. Bertet P., Osnaghi S., Rauschenbeutel A., Nogues G., Auffeves A., Brune M., et al. A complementarity experiment with an interferometer at the quantum-classical boundary. Nature 411 (2001) 166-179
4. Bohr N. The quantum postulate and the recent development of atomic theory. Nature 121 Suppl. (1928) 580-590
5. Bohr N. Discussion with Einstein on the epistemological problems in atomic physics. In: Schilpp P.A. (Ed). Albert Einstein: Philosopher-scientist Vol. 7 (1949), Open Court, La Salle 201-241
6. Brune M., Hagley E., Dreyer J., Maitre X., Maali A., Wunderlich C., et al. Observing the progressive decoherence of the "meter" in a quantum measurement. Physical Review Letters 77 (1996) 4887-4890
7. Bub J. Interpreting the quantum world (1997), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York
8. Caldeira A.O., and Leggett A.J. Influence of dissipation on quantum tunnelling in macroscopic systems. Physical Review Letters 46 (1981) 211-214
9. Caldeira A.O., and Leggett A.J. Path integral approach to quantum Brownian motion. Physica A 121 (1983) 587-616
10. Caldeira A.O., and Leggett A.J. Influence of damping on quantum interference: An exactly soluble model. Physical Review A 31 (1985) 1059-1066
11. Camilleri K. Constructing the myth of the Copenhagen interpretation. Perspectives on Science 17 (2009) 26-57
12. Chiorescu I., Nakamura Y., Harmans C.J., and Mooij J.E. Coherent quantum dynamics of a superconducting flux qubit. Science 21 (2003) 1869-1871
13. Davidovich L., Brune M., Raimond J.M., and Haroche S. Mesoscopic quantum coherences in cavity QED: Preparation and decoherence monitoring schemes. Physics Review A 53 (1996) 1295-1309
14. d'Espagnat B. Foundations of quantum mechanics. In Proceeding of the International School of Physics "Enrico Fermi" (1971), Academic Press, New York, London
15. d'Espagnat B. Veiled reality: An analysis of present-day quantum mechanical concepts (1995), Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA (Advanced Book Program)
16. Everett, H. (1955). Objective versus subjective probability. Unpublished manuscript, Everett Papers. Box 1, Folder 3.
17. Everett H. Relative-state formulation of quantum mechanics. Reviews of Modern Physics 29 (1957) 454-462
18. Everett, H. (1957b). On the foundations of quantum mechanics. Unpublished Ph.D., Princeton University, Princeton.
19. In: Faye J., and Folse H.J. (Eds). Niels Bohr and contemporary philosophy (1994), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht; Boston
20. Freire O. The historical roots of 'foundations of quantum physics' as a field of research (1950-1970). Foundations of Physics 34 (2004) 1741-1760
21. Freire O. Orthodoxy and heterodoxy in the research on the foundations of quantum physics: E. P. Wigner's case. In: Santos S. (Ed). Cognitive justice in a global world. Prudent knowledge for a decent life (2007), Lexington Books, Lanham, MD 203-224
22. Freire, O. (2009). Quantum dissidents: Research on the foundations of quantum theory circa 1970', Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, this issue.
23. Howard D. Who invented the "Copenhagen Interpretation"? A study in mythology. Philosophy of Science 71 (2004) 669-682
24. Hu B.L., Paz J.P., and Zhang Y. Quantum Brownian motion in a general environment: Exact master equation with nonlocal dissipation and coloured noise. Physical Review D 45 (1992) 2843-2861
25. Hull D.L. Science as a process: An evolutionary account of the social and conceptual development of science (1988), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
26. Il'ichev E., Oukhanski N., Izmalkov A., Wagner T., Grajcar M., Meyer H.-G., Smirnov A.Y., van den Brink A.M., and Amin M.H. Continuous monitoring of Rabi oscillations in a Josephson flux. Physical Review Letters 91 (2003) 097906.1-097906.4
27. Interview with Zeh conducted by Fábio Freitas, 25 July 2008. Audio recording and transcript deposited at the American Institute of Physics.
28. Janssen, H. (2008). Reconstructing reality: Environment-induced decoherence, the measurement problem and the emergence of definiteness in quantum mechanics: A critical assessment. Unpublished Masters, Radboud University, Nijmegen. Available at 〈http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00004224〉
29. Jammer M. The Philosophy of quantum mechanics: The interpretation of quantum mechanics in historical perspective (1974), Wiley, New York
30. John A. Wheeler papers. Series II, Box Wo-Ze, folder Zeh. American Philosophical Society, Philadelphia.
31. Joos E. Quantum theory and the appearance of the classical world. In: Greenberger D. (Ed). New techniques and ideas in quantum measurement theory (1986), New York Academy of Sciences, New York 6-13
32. Joos E., and Zeh H.D. The emergence of classical properties through interaction with the environment. Zeitschrift für Physik B-Condensed Matter 59 (1985) 223-243
33. Joos E., Zeh H.D., Kiefer O., Giulini D., Kupsch J., and Stametescu I.O. Decoherence and the appearance of a classical world in quantum theory. 2nd ed. (2003), Springer, Berlin; New York
34. Kant I. The critique of pure reason (J. M. D. Meiklejohn, Trans.). (1990), Colonial Press, London; New York
35. Kübler O., and Zeh H.D. Dynamics of quantum correlations. Annalen der Physik 76 (1973) 405-418
36. Leggett A.J. Schrödinger's cat and her laboratory cousins. Contemporary Physics 25 (1984) 583-598
37. Leggett A.J. The superposition principle in a macroscopic system. In: Nakajima S., and Tonomura Y. (Eds). Foundations of quantum mechanics in the light of new technology. Selected papers from the proceedings of the first through fourth international symposia on foundations of quantum mechanics (1996), World Scientific, Singapore; New Jersey; London; Hong Kong 27-35
38. Leggett A.J., and Garg A. Quantum mechanics versus macroscopic realism: Is the flux there when nobody looks?. Physical Review Letters 54 (1985) 857-860
39. Letters to the Editor: Negotiating the tricky border between quantum and classical. (1993). Physics Today, 46(April), 13-15, 81-84.
40. Maitre X., Hagley E., Dreyer J., Maali A., Brune C.W.M., Raimond J.M., et al. An experimental study of a Schrödinger cat decoherence with atoms and cavities. Journal of Modern Optics 44 (1997) 2023-2032
41. Munro C., Meekhof D.M., King B.E., and Wineland D.J.A. "Schrödinger's cat" superposition state of an atom. Science 272 (1996) 1131-1136
42. Omnès R. The interpretation of quantum mechanics (1994), Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
43. Omnès R. Understanding quantum mechanics (1999), Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
44. Osnaghi S., Freitas F., and Freire O. The origin of the Everettian heresy. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 40 (2009) 97-123
45. Pinch T.J. What does a proof do if it does not prove? A study of the social conditions and metaphysical divisions leading to David Bohm and John von Neumann failing to communicate in quantum physics. In: Mendelsohn E., and Whitley P. (Eds). The Social production of scientific knowledge Vol. 1 (1977), D. Reidel Pub. Co., Dordrecht, Holland; Boston 171-215
46. Raimond J.M., Brune M., and Haroche S. Reversible decoherence of a mesoscopic superposition of field states. Physics Review Letters 79 (1997) 1964-1967
47. Raimond J.M., Brune M., and Haroche S. Manipulating quantum entanglement with atoms and photons in a cavity. Review of Modern Physics 73 (2001) 565-582
48. Röseberg U. Hidden historicity: The challenge of Bohr's philosophical thought. In: Faye J., and Folse H. (Eds). Niels Bohr and contemporary philosophy (1994), Kluwer, Dordrecht 325-344
49. Scheibe E. The logical analysis of quantum mechanics (1973), Pergamon Press, Oxford; New York
50. Schlosshauer M.A. Decoherence, the measurement problem, and interpretations of quantum mechanics. Review of Modern Physics 76 (2004) 1267-1305
51. Schlosshauer M.A. Decoherence and the quantum-to-classical transition (2007), Springer, Berlin; London
52. Schlosshauer, M. A., & Camilleri, K. (2008). The quantum-to-classical transition: Bohr's doctrine of classical concepts, emergent classicality, and decoherence. Available as eprint: 〈http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0804/0804.1609v1.pdf〉.
53. Shimony A. Wigner on foundations of quantum mechanics. In: Wightman A.S. (Ed). The collected works of Eugene Paul Wigner Vol. Part A-Vol. III Particles and fields; Foundations of quantum mechanics (1997), Springer, Berlin 401-414
54. Stapp H. The Copenhagen interpretation. American Journal of Physics 40 (1972) 1098-1116
55. Tegmark M. Apparent wave function collapse caused by scattering. Foundations of Physics Letters 6 (1993) 571-590
56. Unruh W.G., and Zurek W.H. Reduction of a wavepacket in quantum Brownian motion. Physical Review D 40 (1989) 1071-1094
57. Vaihinger H. Die Philosophie des Als Ob. System der Theoretischen, Praktischen und Religiosen Fiktionen der Menschheit auf Grund Eines Idealistischen Positivismus, mit einem Anhang uber Kant und Nietzsche (1924), F. Meiner, Leipzig
58. Vaihinger H. The philosophy of 'As if': A system of the theoretical, practical and religious fictions of mankind (C. K. Ogden, Trans.) (1924), Kegan Paul Trench Trubner, London
59. Wallace D. Worlds in the Everett interpretation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 33 (2002) 637-661
60. Wallace D. Everett and structure. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 34 (2003) 87-105
61. Weizsäcker C.F.v. The World View of Physics (1952), Routledge & Kegan Paul, London
62. Weizsäcker C.F.v. The Copenhagen interpretation. In: Bastin T. (Ed). Quantum theory and beyond. Essays and discussions arising from a colloquium (1971), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 25-31
63. Wheeler J.A. Assessment of Everett's 'relative state' formulation of quantum theory. Reviews of Modern Physics 29 (1957) 463-465
64. Whitaker A. Einstein, Bohr and the quantum dilemma (1996), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
65. Wigner E. The subject of our discussions. In: d'Espagnat B. (Ed). Foundations of quantum measurement (1971), Academic Press, New York; London 1-19
66. Wigner E. Epistemological perspective on quantum theory. In: Hooker C.A. (Ed). Contemporary research in the foundations and philosophy of quantum theory (1973), Reidel, Dordrecht 369-385
67. Wooters W.K., and Zurek H.D. Complementarity in the double-slit experiment: Quantum nonseparability and a quantitative statement of Bohr's principle. Physical Review D 19 (1979) 473-484
68. Zeh, H. D. (1967a). Probleme der Quantentheorie. Unpublished manuscript, Typescript available at: 〈http://www.zeh-hd.de/〉.
69. Zeh H.D. Symmetrieverletzende Modellzustände und kollektive Bewegungen. Zeitschrift für Physik A: Hadrons and Nuclei 202 (1967) 38-48
70. Zeh H.D. On the interpretation of measurement in quantum theory. Foundations of Physics 1 (1970) 69-76
71. Zeh H.D. On the irreversibility of time and observation in quantum theory. In: d'Espagnat B. (Ed). Foundations of quantum mechanics (1971), Academic Press, New York; London 263-273
72. Zeh H.D. Toward a quantum theory of observation. Foundations of Physics 3 (1973) 109-116
73. Zeh H.D. There are no quantum jumps, nor are there particles!. Physics Letters A 172 (1993) 189-192
74. Zeh, H. D. (1997). What is achieved by decoherence? In Fererro, M., van der Merwe, A. (Eds.), New developments on fundamental problems in quantum physics (pp. 441-451). Dordrecht: Kluwer, Eprint available at 〈http://www.zeh-hd.de/〉.
75. Zeh, H. D. (2000a). The meaning of decoherence. Available as eprint: 〈http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/quant-ph/pdf/9905/9905004v2.pdf〉.
76. Zeh, H. D. (2000b). The problem of conscious observation in quantum mechanical description. Foundations of Physics Letters, 13, 221-233. A early version of this paper was originally circulated in 1981 by means of the Epistemological letters of the Ferdinand-Gosneth Association in Biel (Switzerland). Available as an eprint at: 〈http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9908084〉.
77. Zeh H.D. Basic concepts and their interpretation. In: Joos E., Zeh H.D., Kiefer O., Giulini D., Kupsch J., and Stamatescu I.O. (Eds). Decoherence and the appearance of a classical world in quantum theory (2003), Springer, Berlin; New York 7-40
78. Zeh, H. D. (2006). Roots and fruits of decoherence. Available as eprint: 〈http://arxiv:quant-ph/0512078v2〉. In Duplantier, B., Raimond, J. M. & Riveasseau, V. (Eds.), Quantum decoherence (pp. 151-175). Birkhäuser.
79. Zeh, H. D. (2007). How decoherence can solve the measurement problem. Available as eprint: 〈http://www.rzuser.uni-heidelberg.de/∼as3/SolveMeas.html〉.
80. Zeh, H. D. Personal communication. 22, 24 May, 2, 24 June, 21 November, 2008.
81. Zurek W.H. Pointer basis of quantum apparatus: Into what mixture does the wave packet collapse?. Physics Review D 24 (1981) 1516-1525
82. Zurek W.H. Environment-induced superselection rules. Physics Review D 26 (1982) 1862-1880
83. Zurek, W. H. (1986). Reduction of the wave packet: How long does it take? In More, G. T., & Scully, M. O. (Eds.), Frontiers of nonequillibrium statistical mechanics (pp. 145-149). New York: Plenum Press. Available as eprint: 〈http://arxiv.quantum-ph/0302044v1〉.
84. Zurek W.H. Decoherence and the transition from quantum to classical. Physics Today 44 October (1991) 36-44
85. Zurek W.H. Preferred states, predictability, classicality and the environment-induced decoherence. Progress of Theoretical Physics 89 (1993) 281-312
86. Zurek W.H. Zurek replies: Negotiating the tricky border between quantum and classical. Physics Today 46 April (1993) 84-90
87. Zurek W.H. Pointer basis, and inhibition of quantum tunnelling by environment-induced superselection. In: Nakajima S., Murayama Y., and Tonomura A. (Eds). Foundations of quantum mechanics in the light of new technology. Selected papers from the proceedings of the first through fourth international symposia on foundations of quantum mechanics (1996), World Scientific, Singapore; New Jersey; London; Hong Kong 85-93
88. Zurek, W. H. (2002). Decoherence and the transition from quantum to classical-revisited. Los Alamos Science, 27(1), 25, Available as eprint: 〈http://arxiv.org/ftp/quant-ph/papers/0306/0306072.pdf〉.
89. Zurek, W. H. (2007). Relative states and the environment: Einselection, envariance, quantum Darwinism, and the existential interpretation. Available as eprint: 〈http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0707/0707.2832v1.pdf〉.
90. Zurek, W. H. Personal communication, 4 July 2008.