Early failure of a unicompartmental knee arthroplasty design with an all-polyethylene tibial component

Knee

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 53-56

  Saenz, Cesar L ^a   McGrath, Mike S ^a   Marker, David R ^a   Seyler, Thorsten M ^b   Mont, Michael A ^a   Bonutti, Peter M ^c  

^a SINAI HOSPITAL OF BALTIMORE   (United States)

^b WAKE FOREST SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c Bonutti Clinic   (United States)

Author keywords

Failure; Metal backed; Outcome; Polyethylene; Tibial component; Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

POLYETHYLENE;

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; BONE NECROSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GENDER; HUMAN; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE DISEASE; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIPLE REGRESSION; OBESITY; PATELLOFEMORAL JOINT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; SCORING SYSTEM; SURGEON; SURVIVAL RATE;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; FEMUR HEAD NECROSIS; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; POLYETHYLENE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; TIBIA;

EID: 71849110864     PISSN: 09680160     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.05.007     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Insall J., and Walker P. Unicondylar knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res (1976) 83-85
2. Laskin R.S. Unicompartmental tibiofemoral resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 60 (1978) 182-185
3. Ansari S., Newman J.H., and Ackroyd C.E. St. Georg sledge for medial compartment knee replacement. 461 arthroplasties followed for 4 (1-17) years. Acta Orthop Scand 68 (1997) 430-434
4. Berger R.A., Meneghini R.M., Jacobs J.J., Sheinkop M.B., Della Valle C.J., Rosenberg A.G., et al. Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87 (2005) 999-1006
5. Berger R.A., Nedeff D.D., Barden R.M., Sheinkop M.M., Jacobs J.J., Rosenberg A.G., et al. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clinical experience at 6- to 10-year followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res (1999) 50-60
6. Capra Jr. S.W., and Fehring T.K. Unicondylar arthroplasty. A survivorship analysis. J Arthroplasty 7 (1992) 247-251
7. Cartier P., Sanouiller J.L., and Grelsamer R.P. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty surgery. 10-year minimum follow-up period. J Arthroplasty 11 (1996) 782-788
8. Heck D.A., Marmor L., Gibson A., and Rougraff B.T. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A multicenter investigation with long-term follow-up evaluation. Clin Orthop Relat Res (1993) 154-159
9. Munk B., and Frokjaer J. [A 10-year follow-up of unicompartmental arthrosis treated with the marmor method]. Ugeskr Laeger 156 (1994) 4029-4031
10. Murray D.W., Goodfellow J.W., and O'Connor J.J. The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80 (1998) 983-989
11. Pennington D.W., Swienckowski J.J., Lutes W.B., and Drake G.N. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients sixty years of age or younger. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A (2003) 1968-1973
12. Squire M.W., Callaghan J.J., Goetz D.D., Sullivan P.M., and Johnston R.C. Unicompartmental knee replacement. A minimum 15 year followup study. Clin Orthop Relat Res (1999) 61-72
13. Svard U.C., and Price A.J. Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A survival analysis of an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83 (2001) 191-194
14. Weale A.E., and Newman J.H. Unicompartmental arthroplasty and high tibial osteotomy for osteoarthrosis of the knee. A comparative study with a 12- to 17-year follow-up period. Clin Orthop Relat Res (1994) 134-137
15. Furnes O., Espehaug B., Lie S.A., Vollset S.E., Engesaeter L.B., and Havelin L.I. Failure mechanisms after unicompartmental and tricompartmental primary knee replacement with cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89 (2007) 519-525
16. Hamilton W.G., Collier M.B., Tarabee E., McAuley J.P., Engh Jr. C.A., and Engh G.A. Incidence and reasons for reoperation after minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21 (2006) 98-107
17. O'Rourke M.R., Gardner J.J., Callaghan J.J., Liu S.S., Goetz D.D., Vittetoe D.A., et al. The John Insall award: unicompartmental knee replacement: a minimum twenty-one-year followup, end-result study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 440 (2005) 27-37
18. Tabor Jr. O.B., and Tabor O.B. Unicompartmental arthroplasty: a long-term follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 13 (1998) 373-379
19. Deshmukh R.V., and Scott R.D. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for younger patients: an alternative view. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2002) 108-112
20. Insall J.N., Dorr L.D., Scott R.D., and Scott W.N. Rationale of the knee society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res (1989) 13-14
21. Lustig S., Paillot J.L., Servien E., Henry J., Ait Si Selmi T., and Neyret P. Cemented all polyethylene tibial insert unicompartimental knee arthroplasty: a long term follow-up study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 95 (2009) 12-21
22. Khaw F.M., Kirk L.M., Morris R.W., and Gregg P.J. A randomised, controlled trial of cemented versus cementless press-fit condylar total knee replacement. Ten-year survival analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84 (2002) 658-666
23. Ritter M.A., Herbst S.A., Keating E.M., Faris P.M., and Meding J.B. Long-term survival analysis of a posterior cruciate-retaining total condylar total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (1994) 136-145
24. Argenson J.N., Chevrol-Benkeddache Y., and Aubaniac J.M. Modern unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with cement: a three to ten-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A (2002) 2235-2239
25. Gioe T.J., Killeen K.K., Hoeffel D.P., Bert J.M., Comfort T.K., Scheltema K., et al. Analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in a community-based implant registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2003) 111-119
26. Keblish P.A., and Briard J.L. Mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a 2-center study with an 11-year (mean) follow-up. J Arthroplasty 19 (2004) 87-94
27. Price A.J., Waite J.C., and Svard U. Long-term clinical results of the medial Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2005) 171-180