The many phases of nuclear insecurity

India’s Energy Security

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 207-222

  Ramana, M V ^a   Suchitra, J Y ^a  

^a INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CHANGE   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 71849099617     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203884362-25     Document Type: Chapter

References (65)

1. AERB, 2006. Project Design Safety Committee for Fast Reactor Fuel Cycle Facility, IGCAR, Kalpakkam. (DSRC-FRFCF)
2. Atomic Energy Regulatory Board 2006. Viewed 19 August, 2006 .
3. Baker, P. J. and Hoel, D., 2007. ‘Meta-analysis of standardized incidence and mortality rates of childhood leukaemia in proximity to nuclear facilities.’ European Journal of Cancer Care, 16, pp. 355–363.
4. Balu, K., Purushotham, D. S. C. and Kakodkar, A., 1998. ‘Closing the fuel cycle – a superior option for India.’ Paper read at Fuel Cycle Options for Light Water Reactors and Heavy Water Reactors, 28 April – 1 May 1998, Victoria, Canada.
5. Balu, K, and Ramanujam, A., 1999. ‘Reprocessing and recycle of U/Pu – a safer option for optimum utilization of resources in the nuclear fuel cycle.’ In Pushparaja, R. K. K., Sangurdekar, P. R. and Kurien T. (eds), Radiation protection in nuclear fuel cycle: control of occupational and public exposures. Kakrapar: Indian Association for Radiation Protection, pp. 57–62.
6. BEIR, 1998. Health risks of radon and other internally deposited alpha-emitters (BEIR IV), 1988. Washington: Committee on Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation, National Research Council, National Academy Press.
7. BEIR, 1999. Health effects of exposure to radon (BEIR VI). Washington: Committee on Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation, National Research Council, National Academy Press.
8. Bhabha, H. J. and Prasad, N. B., 1958. ‘A study of the contribution of atomic energy to a power programme in India.’ Paper read at Second United Nations International Conference on the Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy, 1958, Geneva.
9. Brealey, R. A. and Myers, S. C., 2000. Principles of corporate finance, 6th ed. Boston: Irwin McGraw-Hill.
10. Bunn, M., Fetter, S., Holdren, J. P. and van der Zwaan B., 2003. The economics of reprocessing vs. direct disposal of spent nuclear fuel. Cambridge: Harvard University.
11. Bunn, M., Holdren, J. P., Fetter, S. and van der Zwaan, B., 2005., ‘The economics of reprocessing versus direct disposal of spent nuclear fuel.’ Nuclear Technology, 150, pp. 209–230.
12. CERC, 2006. Annual Escalation Rates for Bid Evaluation: Central Electricity Regulatory Commission Notification Eco 2/2006-CERC, October 26, 2006. Viewed 9 November, 2006.
13. Chanda, N., 1999. ‘The perils of power.’ Far Eastern Economic Review, 4 February 1999.
14. Chernobyl Forum, 2005. Chernobyl’s legacy: health, environmental and socio-economic impacts and recommendations to the Governments of Belarus, the Russian Federation and Ukraine. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency.
15. Chetal, S. C., Balasubramaniyan, V., Chellapandi, P., Mohanakrishnan, P., Puthiyavinayagam, P., Pillai, C. P., Raghupathy, S., Shanmugham, T. K. and Pillai, C. S., 2006. ‘The design of the prototype fast breeder reactor.’ Nuclear Engineering and Design, 236, pp. 852–860.
16. Chowdhary, S. K., 1998. ‘Coal in India.’ Presentation at the 17th World Energy Congress, September 13–18, 1998, Houston.
17. Deffeyes, K. S. and MacGregor, I. D., 1980. ‘World uranium resources.’ Scientific American, January 1980, pp. 66–76.
18. Deutch, J., Moniz, E. J., Ansolabehere, S., Driscoll, M., Gray, P. E., Holdren, J. P., Joskow, P. L., Lester, R. K. and Todreas, N. E., 2003. The future of nuclear power: an interdisciplinary MIT study. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
19. Dey, P. K., 2003. ‘Spent fuel reprocessing: an overview.’ Paper read at Nuclear Fuel Cycle Technologies: Closing the Fuel Cycle, December 17–19, 2003 at Kalpakkam.
20. Eichstaedt, P. H., 1994. If you poison us: uranium and Native Americans. Santa Fe, N M: Red Crane Books.
21. Eisenbud, M., and Gesell, T. F., 1997. Environmental radioactivity: from natural, industrial, and military sources. 4th ed. San Diego: Academic Press.
22. Farmer, A., 1984. ‘Assessing the economics of the liquid metal fast breeder reactor.’ In Brookes, L. G. and Motamen, H. (eds.) The economics of nuclear energy. London: Chapman and Hall.
23. Gadekar, S. and Gadekar, S. N., 1996. ‘Rawatbhata.’ In Gaur, V. (ed), Nuclear energy and public safety. New Delhi: Indian National Trust for Art and Cultural Heritage.
24. Gadekar, Surendra, Shreekumar and Gadekar, Sanghamitra (In preparation). Health impacts of uranium mining in Jaduguda, India.
25. Gilles, C., 1996. ‘No one ever told us: Native Americans and the great uranium experiment.’ In Bryne, J. and Hoffman, S. M. (eds.) Governing the atom: the politics of risk. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
26. Glaser, A., and Ramana, M. V., 2007. ‘Weapon-grade plutonium production potential in the Indian prototype fast breeder reactor.’ Science and Global Security, 15, pp. 85–105.
27. Greenpeace, 2006. The Chernobyl catastrophe: consequences on human health. Amsterdam: Greenpeace.
28. Hibbs, M., 1995. ‘Tarapur-2 to join twin BWR in burning PHWR plutonium.’ Nuclear Fuel, 20(20), p.18.
29. Hibbs, M., 2003. ‘DAE reprocessing program remains modest in scope.’ Nuclear Fuel 28(8), p. 18.
30. IGCAR, 2003. ‘Design of prototype fast breeder reactor.’ Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research 2003., Viewed 10 March, 2006 .
31. Kakodkar, A., 2006. ‘Securing our emerging energy needs: what nuclear energy can do.’ Energy Security Insights, 1(1), pp. 4–7.
32. Kumar, A. and Ramana, M. V. (Forthcoming). ‘Nuclear safety in India: theoretical perspectives and empirical evidence.’
33. Kumar, A. and Ramana, M. V. Submitted. ‘Compromising safety: design choices and severe accident possibilities in India’s prototype fast breeder reactor.’
34. Lifton, R. J. and Falk, R., 1982. Indefensible weapons: the political and psychological case against nuclearism. New York: Basic Books.
35. López-Abente, G., Aragonés, N. and Pollán, M., 2001. ‘Solid-tumor mortality in the vicinity of uranium cycle facilities and nuclear power plants in Spain.’ Environmental Health Perspectives, 109(7), pp. 721–729.
36. Makhijani, A., Hu, H. and Yih, K., 1995. Nuclear wastelands: a global guide to nuclear weapons production and its health and environmental effects. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
37. Muralidharan, S., 1988. ‘Birth of nuclear power corporation.’ Economic and Political Weekly, 23(5), pp. 190–192.
38. National Research Council, 1996. Nuclear wastes: technologies for separations and transmutation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
39. NEA, 2002. Accelerator-driven systems (ADS) and fast reactors (FR) in advanced nuclear fuel cycles. Paris: Nuclear Energy Agency, OECD.
40. NEA, 2002a. Chernobyl: assessment of radiological and health impacts (2002 update of Chernobyl: ten years on.) Paris: OECD Nuclear Energy Agency.
41. Nema, A. K., 1999. ‘Nuclear generation cost in India.’ Nu-Power, 13(1).
42. Nouni, M. R., Mullick, S. C. and Kandpal, T. C., 2006. ‘Photovoltaic projects for decentralized power supply in India: a financial evaluation.’ Energy Policy, 34(18), pp. 3727–38.
43. Perrow, C., 1984. Normal accidents: living with high risk technologies. New York: Basic Books.
44. Planning Commission, 2006. Integrated energy policy: Report of the Expert Committee. New Delhi: Planning Commission, Government of India.
45. Prasad, A. N., 1996. ‘Spent fuel reprocessing: a technology at cross roads.’ In Seminar on Indian Reprocessing, Kalpakkam, pp 13–18, Project KARP, BARC Facilities.
46. Rahman Aziz ur and Basu, 1999. ‘Living in death shadow’, Sunday, 4 April.
47. Ramana, M. V., 2007, ‘Economics of nuclear power: subsidies and competitiveness.’ Economic and Political Weekly, 42(2), pp. 169–171.
48. Ramana, M. V., 2007. ‘Heavy subsidies in heavy water: economics of nuclear power in India.’ Economic and Political Weekly, 42(34), pp. 3483–90.
49. Ramana, M. V., D’Sa, A. and Reddy, A. K. N., 2005. ‘Economics of nuclear power from heavy water reactors.’ Economic and Political Weekly, 40(17), pp. 1763–73.
50. Ramana, M. V. and Suchitra, J. Y. 2007. ‘Costing plutonium: economics of reprocessing in India.’ International Journal of Global Energy Issues 27(4), pp. 454–471.
51. Ramana, M. V., Thomas, D. G. and Varughese, S., 2001. ‘Estimating nuclear waste production in India.’ Current Science 81(11), pp. 1458–62.
52. Rethinaraj, T. S. G., 1999. ‘In the comfort of secrecy.’ Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 55(6), pp. 52–57.
53. Riyas, A. and Mohanakrishnan, P., 2008. ‘Studies on physics parameters of metal (U-Pu-Zr) fuelled FBR cores.’ Annals of Nuclear Energy, 35(1), pp. 87–92.
54. Sagan, S., 1993. The limits of safety: organizations, accidents and nuclear weapons. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
55. Schneider, E. and Sailor, W. C., 2005. Long term uranium supply issues and estimates. Washington, DC: Los Alamos National Laboratory, US Department of Energy.
56. Sethna, H., 1979, ‘India’s atomic energy programme – past and future.’ IAEA Bulletin, 21(5), pp. 2–11.
57. Shields, L. M., Wiese, W. H., Skipper, B. J., Charley, B. and Benally, L., 1992. ‘Navajo birth outcomes in the Shiprock uranium mining area.’ Health Physics, 63(5), pp. 542–51.
58. Shukla, P. R., Ghosh, D. and Garg, A., 2003. ‘Future energy trends and GHG emissions for India.’ In Toman, M. A., Chakravaraty, U. and Gupta, S. (eds.) Global climate change: perspectives on economics and policy from a developing country. Washington DC: Resources for the Future.
59. Sonowal, C. J. and Jojo, S. K., 2003. ‘Radiation and tribal health in Jadugoda: the contention between science and sufferings.’ Studies of Tribes and Tribals, 1(2), pp. 111–26.
60. Srinivasan, M. R., 1985. ‘The Indian nuclear power programme.’ Paper presented at Indo-French Seminar on Nuclear Energy, Bombay, 1–4 April 1985.
61. Suchitra, J. Y. and Ramana, M. V. (In preparation.) ‘The costs of power: plutonium and the economics of India’s prototype fast breeder reactor.’
62. Thakur, S. and Chaurasia, B. P., 2005. Cost effectiveness of electricity generating technologies. Mumbai: Nuclear Power Corporation.
63. Tiwari, M., 1999. ‘A deformed existence.’ Down to Earth, 15 June.
64. UNSCEAR, 2000. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation: UNSCEAR 2000 report to the General Assembly, with scientific annexes. New York: United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, United Nations.
65. Von Hippel, F. and Jones, S., 1997. ‘The slow death of the fast breeder.’ Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 53(5), pp. 46–51.