Scripted Curriculum: Is it a Prescription for Success?

Childhood Education

Volumn 83, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 29-32

  Ede, Anita ^a  

^a OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 71849096783     PISSN: 00094056     EISSN: 21620725     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00094056.2006.10522871     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Coles, G., 2002. “ Learning to read scientifically ”. In Rethinking Schools Online Retrieved February 2, 2005, from www.rethinkingschools.org/special_reports/bushplan/Read154.shtml
2. Comprehensive School Reform Program. (n.d.) Guide to U.S. Department of Education Programs. Retrieved April 3, 2005, http://wdcrobcolp01.ed.gov/CFAPPS/GTEP_PUBLIC/index
3. Dudley-Marling, C., and Murphy, S., 2001. Changing the way we think about language arts. Language Arts, 78 (6): 574–578.
4. Foorman, B. R., Fletcher, J. M., Francis, D. J., Schatschneider, C., and Mehta, P., 1998. The role of instruction in learning to read: Preventing reading failure in at-risk children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90 (1): 37–55.
5. Greenlee, B. J., and Bruner, D. Y., 2001. Effects of Success for All reading programs on reading achievement in Title I schools. Education, 122 (1): 177–188.
6. Mathews, J., January 2000. “ Prepackaged school reform ”. In The School Administrator January, Retrieved April 2, 2005, from www.aasa.org/publications/sa/2000_/mathews.htm
7. McGraw-Hill Companies. October 2003. Investors: News releases October, Retrieved April 2, 2005, from http://investor.mcgraw-hill.com
8. Metcalf, R., January 2002. “ Reading between the lines ”. In The Nation January, Retrieved April 2, 2005, from www.thenation.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20020128&s=metcalf
9. Moustafa, M., and Land, R. E., 2002. “ The reading achievement of economically disadvantaged children in urban schools using Open Court vs. comparably disadvantaged children using non-scripted reading programs. 2002 Yearbook of the ”. In Urban Learning, Teaching, and Research Special Interest Group of the American Educational Research Association 44–53.
10. National Right to Read Foundation, The. February 2003. Paige announces $12.5 million Reading First grant for Oklahoma children February, Retrieved February 6, 2005, from www.nrrf.org/pr_OK-RF_2–6–03.htm
11. Open Court. 2002. Programs & Practices Retrieved on April 3, 2005, from www.sra4kids.com
12. Perkins-Gough, D., 2004. The eroding curriculum. Educational Leadership, 62 (1): 84–85.
13. Pogrow, S., 2002. Success for All is a failure. Phi Delta Kappan, 83 (6) February: 463–468.
14. Posnick-Goodwin. 2002. Scripted learning: A slap in the face?. California Educator, 6 (7): 6–16.
15. Slavin, R. E., and Madden, N., 2001. Research on achievement outcomes of Success for All. Phi Delta Kappan, 82 (1): 38–66.