The effect of cycle lanes on the proximity between motor traffic and cycle traffic

Accident Analysis and Prevention

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 159-165

  Parkin, John ^a   Meyers, Ciaran ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLTON   (United Kingdom)

^b ARUP   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bicycle; Bicycle facility; Risk

Indexed keywords

CARRIAGEWAYS; SPEED LIMIT; VEHICLE TYPES;

AUTOMOBILE DRIVERS; MOTORS; ROADS AND STREETS;

BICYCLES;

ARTICLE; BICYCLE; CAR DRIVING; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; HIGH RISK BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; TRAFFIC ACCIDENT;

ACCIDENTS, TRAFFIC; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; BICYCLING; ENVIRONMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; RISK-TAKING;

EID: 71849095751     PISSN: 00014575     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.07.018     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Basford, L., Reid, S., Lester, T., Thomson, J., Tolmie, A. 2002. Drivers' perception of cyclists. TRL Report TRL549. Transport Research Laboratory, Crowthorne.
2. CROW. Sign Up for the Bike: Design Manual for a Cycle Friendly Infrastructure (1993), Centre for Research and Contract Standardisation in Civil and Traffic Engineering, Netherlands
3. CROW. Design Manual for Bicycle Traffic (2006), Centre for Research and Contract Standardisation in Civil and Traffic Engineering, Netherlands
4. DfT, 2008. Cycle Infrastructure design. Local Transport Note 02/08. October 2008. Department for Transport, London, www.dft.gov.uk.
5. Davies, D.G., Halliday, M.E., Mayes, M., Pocock, R.L., 1997. Attitudes to cycling: a qualitative study and conceptual framework. TRL Report 266. Transport Research Laboratory, Crowthorne.
6. FHWA. Safety and locational criteria for bicycle facilities. User Manual 1: Bicycle Facility Location Criteria; FHWA-RD-75-113 (1975), Federal Highway Administration, US Department of Transportation, Washington, DC
7. FHWA. Bicycle Lanes Versus Wide Curb Lanes: Operational and Safety Findings and Countermeasure Recommendations; FHWA-RD-99-035 (1999), Federal Highway Administration, US Department of Transportation. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ www.fhwa.dot.gov
8. Gardner, G., 1998. Transport implications of leisure cycling. TRL Report TRL347. Transport Research Laboratory, Crowthorne.
9. Guthrie, N., Davies, D.G., Gardner, G., 2001. Cyclists' assessments of road and traffic conditions: the development of a cyclability index. TRL Report 490. Transport Research Laboratory, Crowthorne.
10. Harkey, D.L., Reinfurt, D.W., Knuiman, M., 1998. Development of the Bicycle Compatibility Index. Transportation Research Record, 1636, Paper No. 98-1073.
11. Henson R.R., Skinner A., and Georgeson N. Analysis of cycling deterrence factors in Greater Manchester. Proceedings of Velo City the 10th International Bicycle Planning Conference. Barcelona, Spain (1997)
12. Lancashire County Council, 2005. Lancashire-the cyclists' county. A code for planning, designing and maintaining roads and tracks for cyclists. Lancashire County Council Environment Directorate, Preston. http://www.lancashire.gov.uk.
13. Landis B.W., Vattikuti V.R., and Brannick M.T. Real-time human perceptions toward a bicycle level of service. Transportation Research Record 1578 (1997)
14. Owens P. The Effect of Cycle Lanes on Cyclists' Road Space (2005). www.warringtoncyclecampaign.co.uk
15. Parkin J., Wardman M., and Page M. Models of perceived cycling risk and route acceptability. Accident Analysis and Prevention 39 2 (2007) 364-371 10.1016/j.aap.2006.08.007
16. Sorton A., and Walsh T. Bicycle stress level as a tool to evaluate urban and suburban bicycle compatibility. Transportation Research Record 1438 (1994) 17-24
17. Stone M., and Broughton J. Getting off your bike: cycling accidents in Great Britain in 1990-1999. Accident Analysis and Prevention 35 (2003) 549-556
18. Walker I. Drivers overtaking bicyclists: objective data on the effects of riding position, helmet use, vehicle type and apparent gender. Accident Analysis and Prevention 39 2 (2007) 417-425 10.1016/j.aap.2006.08.010