|
Volumn 339, Issue 7732, 2009, Pages 1230-
|
Ethical debate: Are advance directives legally binding or simply the starting point for discussion on patients' best interests?
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ALCOHOL;
CHLORAL HYDRATE;
COCODAMOL;
DIAZEPAM;
FLUOXETINE;
METHOTREXATE;
ADULT;
AIRWAY OBSTRUCTION;
ARTHRALGIA;
ARTHRITIS;
ASSISTED VENTILATION;
CASE REPORT;
DEPRESSION;
EMERGENCY WARD;
FEMALE;
GASTROINTESTINAL SYMPTOM;
HUMAN;
INTENSIVE CARE;
INTUBATION;
ISCHIALGIA;
LEGAL ASPECT;
LIFE SUSTAINING TREATMENT;
LIVING WILL;
LUNG COMPLICATION;
MEDICAL ETHICS;
PATIENT DECISION MAKING;
PATIENT MOBILITY;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS;
SHORT SURVEY;
SUICIDE;
TERMINAL CARE;
AGED;
ARTICLE;
CASE MANAGEMENT;
DECISION MAKING;
ETHICS;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
SUICIDE ATTEMPT;
ADVANCE DIRECTIVE ADHERENCE;
ADVANCE DIRECTIVES;
AGED;
CASE MANAGEMENT;
DECISION MAKING;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
SUICIDE, ATTEMPTED;
|
EID: 71749119780
PISSN: None
EISSN: 17561833
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b4667 Document Type: Short Survey |
Times cited : (15)
|
References (14)
|