Comparative evaluation of different crystal-structured calcium sulfates as bone-filling materials

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials

Volumn 91, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 545-554

  Woo, Kyung Mi ^a   Yu, Bin ^a   Jung, Hong Moon ^a   Lee, Yong Keun ^a  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Bone filling material; Calcium sulfate; Mechanical properties; Osteoblast; Osteoclast

Indexed keywords

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE ACTIVITY; BIOLOGICAL PERFORMANCE; BONE FILLING; BONE FILLING MATERIALS; BONE FILLING-MATERIAL; BONE SIALOPROTEINS; CALCIUM RELEASE; CALCIUM SULFATE; CELL RESPONSE; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; HANDLING PROPERTIES; IN-CELL; INJECTABILITY; MC3T3-E1; OSTEOBLAST DIFFERENTIATION; OSTEOBLAST PHENOTYPE; OSTEOCALCIN; OSTEOCLAST DIFFERENTIATION; OSTEOCLASTIC DIFFERENTIATION; PREOSTEOBLASTS; SETTING TIME; SIMULATED BODY FLUIDS; TARTRATE-RESISTANT ACID PHOSPHATASE;

ADHESION; BIOACTIVITY; BIOMATERIALS; BIOMECHANICS; BODY FLUIDS; BONE; CALCIUM; CALCIUM ALLOYS; CELL ADHESION; CELL PROLIFERATION; FILLING; GENE EXPRESSION;

MECHANICAL PROPERTIES;

ACID PHOSPHATASE TARTRATE RESISTANT ISOENZYME; ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; BONE SIALOPROTEIN; CALCIUM SULFATE; FIBRIN; OSTEOCALCIN;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL CELL CULTURE; ARTICLE; BODY FLUID; CALCIUM TRANSPORT; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL TYPE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; ENZYME ACTIVITY; GENE EXPRESSION; MONOCYTE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; OSTEOBLAST; OSTEOCLAST; SIMULATION;

3T3 CELLS; ACID PHOSPHATASE; ALGORITHMS; ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BONE SUBSTITUTES; CALCIUM SULFATE; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CRYSTALLIZATION; DNA; FIBRIN; ISOENZYMES; MATERIALS TESTING; METHYLCELLULOSE; MICE; OSTEOBLASTS; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 71649115512     PISSN: 15524973     EISSN: 15524981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.31428     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Pietrzak WS, Ronk R. Calcium sulfate bone void filler: A review and a look ahead. J Craniofac Surg 2000;11:327-334. (Pubitemid 34863496)
2. Rush SM. Bone graft substitutes: Osteobiologics. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 2005;22:619-630.
3. Thomas MV, Puleo DA, Al-Sabbagh M. Calcium sulfate: A review. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 2005;15:599-607.
4. Guarnieri R, Aldini NN, Pecora G, Fini M, Giardino R. Medial-grade calcium sulfate hemihydrate (surgiplaster) in healing of a human extraction socket-histologic observation at 3 months: A case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:636-641. (Pubitemid 41549233)
5. Payne JM, Cobb CM, Rapley JW, Killoy WJ, Spencer P. Migration of human gingival fibroblasts over guided tissue regeneration barrier materials. J Periodontol 1996;67:236-244. (Pubitemid 126613563)
6. Lazary A, Balla B, Kosa JP, Bacsi K, Nagy Z, Takacs I, Varga PP, Speer G, Lakatos P. Effect of gypsum on proliferation and differentiation of MC3T3-E1 mouse osteoblastic cells. Biomaterials 2007;28:393-399. (Pubitemid 44602233)
7. Rosenblum SF, Frenkel S, Ricci JR, Alexander H. Diffusion of fibroblast growth factor from a plaster of Paris carrier. J Appl Biomater 1993;4:67-72.
8. Rauschmann MA, Wichelhaus TA, Stirnal V, Dingeldein E, Zichner L, Schnettler R, Alt V. Nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite and calcium sulphate as biodegradable composite carrier material for local delivery of antibiotics in bone infections. Biomaterials 2005;26:2677-2684. (Pubitemid 39600720)
9. Lewis KN, Thomas MV, Puleo DA. Mechanical and degradation behavior of polymer-calcium sulfate composites. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2006;17:531-537. (Pubitemid 43725239)
10. Mamidwar SS, Arena C, Kelly S, Alexander H, Ricci J. In vitro characterization of a calcium sulfate/PLLA composite for use as a bone graft material. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2007;81:57-65.
11. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 6873. Dental Gypsum Products. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO; 1998.
12. Powers JM, Sakaguchi RL. Restorative Dental Materials, 12th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2006. p 69-71.
13. Abdullah MA. Surface detail, compressive strength, and dimensional accuracy of gypsum casts after repeated immersion in hypochlorite solution. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95: 462-468.
14. Butta R, Tredwin CJ, Nesbit M, Moles DR. Type IV gypsum compatibility with five addition-reaction silicone impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93:540-544. (Pubitemid 40798343)
15. Urban RM, Turner TM, Hall DJ, Infanger SI, Cheema N, Lim TH, Richelsoph K. An injectable calcium sulfate-based bone graft putty using hydroxypropylmethylcellulose as the plasticizer. Orthopedics 2004;27:S155-S159. (Pubitemid 38159819)
16. Hak DJ. The use of osteoconductive bone graft substitutes in orthopaedic trauma. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2007;15: 525-536.
17. Le Nihouannen D, Guehennec LL, Rouillon T, Pilet P, Bilban M, Layrolle P, Daculsi G. Micro-architecture of calcium phosphate granules and fibrin glue composites for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2006;27:2716-2722. (Pubitemid 43122075)
18. Bluteau G, Pilet P, Bourges X, Bilban M, Spaethe R, Daculsi G, Guicheux J. The modulation of gene expression in osteoblasts by thrombin coated on biphasic calcium phosphate ceramic. Biomaterials 2006;27:2934-2943. (Pubitemid 43208918)
19. Catelas I, Sese N, Wu BM, Dunn JC, Helgerson S, Tawil B. Human mesenchymal stem cell proliferation and osteogenic differentiation in fibrin gels in vitro. Tissue Eng 2006;12: 2385-2396. (Pubitemid 44734995)
20. ASTM C266. ASTM Annual Book of Standards. Cement, Lime, Gypsum. West Conshohocken, PA, USA: ASTM; 1999.
21. ASTM F451-99a. ASTM Annual Book of Standards. Standard Specification for Acrylic Bone Cement. West Conshohocken, PA, USA: ASTM; 1999.
22. Habraken WJEM, Wolke JGC, Mikos AG, Jansen JA. Injectable PLGA microsphere/calcium phosphate cements: Physical properties and degradation characteristics. J Biomater Sci Polym Edn 2006;17:1057-1074.
23. Sidqui M, Collin P, Vitte C, Forest N. Osteoblast adherence and resorption activity of isolated osteoclasts on calcium sulphate hemihydrate. Biomaterials 1995;16:1327-1332.
24. Nilsson M, Wielanek L, Wang JS, Tanner KE, Lidgren L. Factors influencing the compressive strength of an injectable calcium sulfate-hydroxyapatite cement. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2003;14:399-404. (Pubitemid 36649124)
25. Tay BK, Patel VV, Bradford DS. Calcium sulfate- and calcium phosphate-based bone substitutes. Mimicry of the mineral phase of bone. Orthop Clin North Am 1999;30:615-623.
26. Chen WJ, Tsai TT, Chen LH, Niu CC, Lai PL, Fu TS, McCarthy K. The fusion rate of calcium sulfate with local autograft bone compared with autologous iliac bone graft for instrumented short-segment spinal fusion. Spine 2005;30: 2293-2297. (Pubitemid 41504899)
27. Peters CL, Hines JL, Bachus KN, Craig MA, Bloebaum RD. Biological effects of calcium sulfate as a bone graft substitute in ovine metaphyseal defects. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006; 76:456-462.
28. Phang MY, Ng MH, Tan KK, Aminuddin BS, Ruszymah BH, Fauziah O. Evaluation of suitable biodegradable scaffolds for engineered bone tissue. Med J Malaysia 2004;59 (Suppl B): 198-199.
29. Nilsson M, Wang JS, Wielanek L, Tanner KE, Lidgren L. Biodegradation and biocompatability of a calcium sulphatehydroxyapatite bone substitute. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004; 86:120-125. (Pubitemid 38128719)
30. Bohner M. New hydraulic cements based on alpha-tricalcium phosphate-calcium sulfate dihydrate mixtures. Biomaterials 2004;25:741-749. (Pubitemid 37357289)