Paternalistic assumptions and a purported duty to deceive

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 9, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 20-21

  Berger, Jeffrey ^a  

^a WINTHROP UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PLACEBO;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; ETHICS; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; PATERNALISM; PATIENT; PLACEBO EFFECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RECUMBENCY; TRUST;

DECEPTION; HUMANS; PATERNALISM; PATIENTS; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PLACEBO EFFECT; PLACEBOS; TRUST; TRUTH DISCLOSURE;

EID: 71649097964     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265160903234086     Document Type: Article

References (3)

1. Berger, J. T. 2005. Ignorance is bliss? Ethical considerations in ther-apeutic nondisclosure. Cancer Investigation 23(1): 94-98.
2. Foddy, B. 2009. A duty to deceive: Placebos in clinical practice. American Journal of Bioethics 9(12): 4-12.
3. Walsh T. B., S. N., Seidman R., Sysko, and M. Gould 2002. Placebo response in studies of major depression. Journal of the American Medical Association 287: 1840-1847.