Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing and Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Same Patient: A Case Series Comparison

Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 182-187

  Morrison, Todd A ^a   Macaulay, William ^a   Geller, Jeffrey A ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

metal on metal hip resurfacing; outcomes; total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; BONE STRENGTH; CASE STUDY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMUR HEAD; FEMUR HEAD NECROSIS; FEMUR NECK FRACTURE; GAIT DISORDER; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HIP PAIN; HIP SURGERY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; JOINT STIFFNESS; LEG INEQUALITY; LYMPHEDEMA; MALE; METAL IMPLANTATION; METAL ON METAL HIP RESURFACING; PATIENT SELECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPRIOCEPTION; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RANGE OF MOTION; REHABILITATION CARE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 71649097587     PISSN: 10486666     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/j.oto.2009.06.001     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Mont M.A., Seyler T.M., Marker D.R., et al. Use of metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing for the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88 suppl 3 (2006) 90-97
2. Treacy R.B., McBryde C.W., and Pynsent P.B. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A minimum follow-up of five years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87 (2005) 167-170
3. Back D.L., Dalziel R., Young D., et al. Early results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings. An independent prospective study of the first 230 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87 (2005) 324-329
4. Revell M.P., McBryde C.W., Bhatnagar S., et al. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88 suppl 3 (2006) 98-103
5. Treacy R.B. To resurface or replace the hip in the under 65-year-old: The case of resurfacing. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 88 (2006) 349-353
6. Vendittoli P.A., Lavigne M., Girard J., et al. A randomised study comparing resection of acetabular bone at resurfacing and total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88 (2006) 997-1002
7. Macaulay W. Total hip resurfacing: A viable alternative to total hip arthroplasty for the young active hip patient in the United States. Curr Orthop Pract 19 (2008) 107-109
8. Silva M., Lee K.H., Heisel C., et al. The biomechanical results of total hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A (2004) 40-46
9. Loughead J.M., Chesney D., Holland J.P., et al. Comparison of offset in Birmingham hip resurfacing and hybrid total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87 (2005) 163-166
10. Girard J., Lavigne M., Vendittoli P.A., et al. Biomechanical reconstruction of the hip: A randomised study comparing total hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88 (2006) 721-726
11. Mont M.A., Seyler T.M., Ragland P.S., et al. Gait analysis of patients with resurfacing hip arthroplasty compared with hip osteoarthritis and standard total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 22 (2007) 100-108
12. Lilikakis A.K., Arora A., and Villar R.N. Early rehabilitation comparing hip resurfacing and total hip replacement. Hip Int 15 (2005) 189-194
13. Vendittoli P.A., Lavigne M., Roy A.G., et al. A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing in patients less than 65 years old. Hip Int 16 suppl 4 (2006) 73-81
14. Vail T.P., Mina C.A., Yergler J.D., et al. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compares favorably with THA at 2 years follow up. Clin Orthop Relat Res 453 (2006) 123-131
15. Stulberg B.N., Trier K.K., Naughton M., et al. Results and lessons learned from a United States hip resurfacing investigational device exemption trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90 suppl 3 (2008) 21-26
16. Pollard T.C., Baker R.P., Eastaugh-Waring S.J., et al. Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. A five to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88 (2006) 592-600
17. Mont M.A., Marker D.R., Smith J.M., et al. Resurfacing is comparable to total hip arthroplasty at short-term follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467 (2009) 66-71
18. Newman M.A., Barker K.L., Pandit H., et al. Outcomes after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: Could we achieve better function?. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 89 (2008) 660-666
19. Burroughs B.R., Hallstrom B., Golladay G.J., et al. Range of motion and stability in total hip arthroplasty with 28-, 32-, 38-, and 44-mm femoral head sizes. J Arthroplasty 20 (2005) 11-19
20. Shih C.H., Du Y.K., Lin Y.H., et al. Muscular recovery around the hip joint after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 302 (1994) 115-120