Biomass for transportation fuels-A cost-effective option for the German energy supply?

Energy Policy

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 128-140

  Martinsen, Dag ^a   Funk, Carolin ^b   Linssen, Jochen ^a  

^a FORSCHUNGSZENTRUM JÜLICH   (Germany)

^b TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Biomass to liquid; CO2 emissions; Energy model

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS FUELS; BIOMASS POWER PLANTS; BIOMASS TO LIQUID; CRUDE OIL PRICES; ENERGY CARRIERS; ENERGY MODEL; ENERGY SUPPLIES; ENERGY SYSTEM MODEL; FINAL ENERGY; FUEL PRODUCTION; GLOBAL CO; HIGH PRICE; LOCAL EMISSIONS; MODEL RESULTS; MOTOR FUELS; OIL AND GAS; OIL PRODUCT; STRONG ENHANCEMENT; TRANSPORTATION FUELS; TRANSPORTATION SECTOR;

AUTOMOTIVE FUELS; BIOETHANOL; CARBON MONOXIDE; COSTS; CRUDE PETROLEUM; ETHANOL; LIQUIDS; MODEL STRUCTURES; MOTOR TRANSPORTATION; SYNTHESIS GAS; SYNTHETIC FUELS; VEGETABLE OILS;

BIOMASS;

BIOFUEL; CARBON DIOXIDE; CRUDE OIL; DIESEL; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENERGY POLICY; ETHANOL; POWER PLANT; SUBSIDY SYSTEM; TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM;

CHANDIPURA VIRUS;

EID: 71649091712     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.08.064     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. 2 constraints-cost-effective fuel choices in the transportation sector. Energy Policy 31 (2003) 961-976
2. Berndes G., and Hansson J. Bioenergy expansion in the EU: cost-effective climate change mitigation, employment creation and reduced dependency on imported fuels. Energy Policy 35 (2007) 5965-5979
3. Bomb C., McCornic K., Deurwaarder E., and Kaberger T. Biofuels for transport in Europe: Lessons from Germany and the UK. Energy Policy 35 (2007) 2256-2267
4. Bundesregierung, 2000. Agreement between the Federal Government and the Energy Utilities of 14 June 2000 (Vereinbarung zwischen der Bundesregierung und den Energieversorgungsunternehmen vom 14. Juni 2000). Berlin, Federal Government. (in German) 〈http://www.bmu.de/files/pdfs/allgemein/application/pdf/atomkonsens.pdf〉.
5. Bundestag, 2002. Law on the Controlled Phase-out of Nuclear Energy for the Commercial Generation of Electricity (Gesetz zur geordneten Beendigung der Kernenergienutzung zur gewerblichen Erzeugung von Elektrizität). 26. Bundesgsetzblatt, Federal Parliament. (in German).
6. Dautzenberg K., and Hantl J. Biofuel chain development in Germany: Organisation, opportunities, and challenges. Energy Policy 36 (2008) 465-489
7. Destatis, 2000. Population Projection for Germany until the Year 2050-Results of the 9th Co-ordinated Population Projection (Bevölkerungsentwicklung Deutschlands bis zum Jahr 2050-Ergebnisse der 9. koordinierten Bevölkerungsvorausberechnung). Wiesbaden, Federal Statistical Office Germany. (in German).
8. EIA, 2006. International energy outlook. Energy Information Administration, US Department of Energy, DOE/EIA-0484(2006), Washington, DC.
9. Faaij A.P.C. Bio-energy in Europe: changing technology choices. Energy Policy 34 (2006) 322-342
10. FAOSTAT, 2007. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, online database, 〈http://faostat.fao.org/〉.
11. FNR, 2007. Fachagentur Nachwachsende Rohstoffe e.V. Daten und Fakten zu nachwachsenden Rohstoffen, 〈www.fnr.de〉.
12. Fishbone, L.G., Giesen, G., Goldstein, G., Hymmen, H.A., Stocks, K.J., Vos, H., Wil-de, D., Zöcher, R., Balzer, C., Abilock, H., 1983. User's Guide for MARKAL. IEA Energy Technology Systems Analysis Programme.
13. Frick, S., Müller-Langer, F., Thrän, D., 2005. Bereitstellung biogener Festbrennstoffe zur Strom- und Kraftstofferzeugung-Bewertung unterschiedliche Logistikansätze. Abschlussbericht. FNR. Leipzig, Institut für Energetik und Umwelt (IE).
14. Funk, C., Linssen, J., 2008. Bewertung der energetischen Nutzung von Biomasse in Deutschland bis 2030, 10. Symposium Energieinnovation, Graz, Austria.
15. Gielen D.J., Fujino J., Hasimoto S., and Moriguchi Y. Modeling of global biomass policies. Biomass and Bioenergy 25 (2003) 177-195
16. Hake J.-F., Markewitz P., Martinsen D., Vögele S., and Walbeck M. Possible Implications of a Lifetime Extension of German Nuclear Power Plants. Energiewirtschaftliche Tagesfragen 55 (2005) 785-788
17. Horn, M., 2008. Scenarios for primary and final energy carrier prices (Szenarien für Primär- und Endenergieträgerpreise). In Energy Prices and Climate Protection (Energiepreise und Klimaschutz) UBA FKZ20546434. Umweltbundesamt, Climate Change 9/08 (in German).
18. IEA, 2007. World energy outlook 2007. IEA, OECD/IEA, Paris, France.
19. IFEU, 2005. Continuation "Data and Computation Model": Energy Consumption and Emissions from Motor Transport in Germany 1960 to 2030 (Fortschreibung "Daten- und Rechenmodell": Energieverbrauch und Schadstoffemissionen des motorisierten Verkehrs in Deutschland 1960-2030). ifeu-Institut für Energie- und Umweltforschung Heidelberg GmbH, Heidelberg. (in German).
20. Kaltschmitt M., and Hartmann H. Energie aus Biomasse-Grundlagen, Techniken und Verfahren (2001), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York
21. KTBL, 2006. Energiepflanzen, ATB, KTBL, FNR, Darmstadt, Potsdam, Leibniz-Institut für Agrartechnik Potsdam-Bornim e.V. (ATB).
22. Loulou, R., Goldstein, G., Noble, K., 2004. Documentation for the MARKAL Family of Models. IEA Energy Technology Systems Analysis Programme.
23. Loulou, R., Remme, U., Kanudia, A., Lehtila, A., Goldstein, G., 2005. Documentation for the TIMES Model. IEA Energy Technology Systems Analysis Programme.
24. In: Markewitz P., and Stein G. (Eds). The IKARUS Project: Energy Technology Prospects for Germany (2003), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich
25. Martinsen D., Krey V., and Markewitz P. Implications of high energy prices for energy system and emissions-The response from an energy model for Germany. Energy Policy 35 (2007) 4504-4515
26. Martinsen D., Krey V., Markewitz P., and Vögele S. A time-step energy process model for Germany-model structure and results. Energy Studies Review 14 (2006) 35-57
27. 2 mitigation option for Germany? A bottom-up approach. Energy Policy 35 (2007) 4504-4515
28. Martinsen D., Markewitz P., Müller D., Vögele S., and Hake J.-F. IKARUS-energy scenarios until 2030. In: Markewitz P., et al. (Ed). The IKARUS Project: Energy Technology Prospects for Germany (2003), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich
29. Messner S., Golodnikov A., and Gritsevskii A. A stochastic version of the dynamic linear programming model MESSAGE III. Energy 21 (1996) 775-784
30. Messsner S., and Strubegger M. User's Guide for MESSAGE III (1995), International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria
31. 2-neutrale Wege zukünftiger Mobilität durch Biokraftstoffe-Eine Bestandsaufnahme. Endbericht., Institut für Energie- und Umweltforschung Heidelberg. Heidelberg, Germany.
32. WORLDWATCH Iinstitute, 2007. Biofuels for transport-Global potential and im-plications for sustainable energy and agriculture, ISBN: 978-1-84407-422-8, London, UK, Earthscan.