Compromising prioritization from pairwise comparisons considering type I and II errors

European Journal of Operational Research

Volumn 204, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 285-293

  Kim, Deok Hwan ^a   Kim, Kwang Jae ^b   Sam Park, K ^c  

^a Defense Agency for Technology and Quality   (South Korea)

^b Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH)   (South Korea)

^c Korea University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Pairwise comparisons; Prioritization; Product design and development; Type I and II errors

Indexed keywords

ASYMMETRIC DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER LINES; COMPARATIVE STUDIES; DECISION ANALYSIS; HIGH-SPEED INTERNET SERVICES; NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; PAIR-WISE COMPARISON; PAIRED COMPARISON; PRIORITIZATION; PRODUCT DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT; REAL-WORLD; TYPE I AND TYPE II ERRORS;

DECISION MAKING; DECISION THEORY; ERRORS; HEURISTIC ALGORITHMS; INTERNET; MODEMS; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; TELECOMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT; TELEPHONE LINES;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 71649090131     PISSN: 03772217     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.10.008     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Almeida A. Multicriteria decision model for outsourcing contracts selection based on utility function and ELECTRE method. Computers and Operations Research 34 (2007) 3569-3574
2. Benayoun, R., Roy, B., Sussmann, B., 1966. Manuel de Reference du Programme ELECTRE, Note De Synthese et Formation. 25, Direction scientifique SEMA, Paris.
3. Brans J., and Vincke P. A preference ranking organization method: the Promethee method for multiple criteria decision-making. Management Science 31 6 (1985) 647-656
4. Brunk H. Mathematical models for ranking from comparisons. Journal of the American Statistical Association 55 291 (1960) 503-520
5. Cook W., and Kress M. Deriving weights from pairwise comparison ratio matrices: an axiomatic approach. European Journal of Operational Research 37 (1988) 355-362
6. De Keyser, W.S.M., Peeters, P.H.M., 1994. ARGUS - A new multiple criteria method based on the general idea of outranking. In: Paruccini, M. (Ed.), Applying Multiple Criteria Aid for Decision to Environmental Management. ECSC, EEC, EAEC, Brussels and Luxembourg.
7. Fichtner J. On deriving priority vectors from matrices of pairwise comparisons. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 20 6 (1986) 341-345
8. Flueck J., and Korsh J. A generalized approach to maximum likelihood paired comparison ranking. The Annals of Statistics 3 4 (1975) 846-861
9. Huylenbroeck G. The conflict analysis method: bridging the gap between ELECTRE, PROMETHEE and ORESTE. European Journal of Operational Research 82 (1995) 490-502
10. Jeong B., and Cho K. Deriving weight in the multiattribute decision making with imprecise pairwise comparison. Journal of the Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society 19 2 (1994) 75-84
11. Kacprzyk J., and Roubens M. Non-conventional Preference Relations in Decision Making, Titled for Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems (1988), Springer-Verlag
12. Keeney R.L., and Raiffa H. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs (1976), Wiley, New York
13. Kendall M. Further Contributions to the theory of paired comparisons. Biometrics 11 (1955) 43-62
14. Lattin J., Carroll J., and Green P. Analyzing Multivariate Data (2002), Thomson Learning, Inc., Canada
15. Li Z., and Tang S. Face recognition using improved pairwise coupling support vector machines. Neural Information Processing 2 (2002) 11-22
16. Macharis C., Springael J., Brucker K., and Verbeke A. PROMETHEE and AHP: the design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis. Strengthening PROMETHEE with ideas of AHP. European Journal of Operational Research 153 (2004) 307-317
17. Mareschal B. Stochastic PROMETHEE multicriteria decision making under uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research 26 (1986) 58-64
18. Montgomery D. Introduction to Statistical Quality Control. second ed. (1985), Wiley, Inc., New York
19. Ovchinnikov S., and Roubens M. On fuzzy strict preference, indifference, and incomparability relations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 49 (1992) 15-20
20. Park K.S. Mathematical programming models for characterizing dominance and potential optimality when multicriteria alternative values and weights are simultaneously incomplete. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A 34 (2004) 601-614
21. Parreiras R., and Vasconcelos J. A multiplicative version of Promethee II applied to multiobjective optimization problems. European Journal of Operational Research 183 (2007) 729-740
22. Rardin R. Optimization in Operations Research (1998), Prentice Hall, Inc., New Jersey
23. Roy B. ELECTRE III: Un Algorithme de Classement fonde sur une Representation Floue des Preference en Presence de Criteres Multiples. Cahiers de CERO 20 1 (1978) 3-24
24. Roy, B. Bertier, P., 1971. La Methode ELECTRE II: Une Methode De Classement en Presence de Critteres Multiples. SEMA (Metra International), Direction Scientifique, Note de Travail, 142, Paris.
25. Saaty T. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 15 (1977) 234-281
26. Saaty T., and Vargas L. Uncertainty and rank order in the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research 32 (1987) 107-117
27. Tsoukias A., and Vincke P. A survey on non conventional preference modeling. Ricerca Operativa 61 (1992) 5-49
28. Tversky A., and Thaler R.H. Anomalies: preference reversals. Journal of Economic Perspectives 4 2 (1990) 201-211
29. Ulrich K., and Eppinger S. Product Design and Development (2004), McGraw-Hill, New York
30. Vincke P., Gassner M., and Roy B. Multicriteria Decision-Aid (1992), John Wiley & Sons, Chichester
31. Zendehdel, K., Rademaker, M., De Baets, B., Huylenbroeck, G., 2009. Improving tractability of group decision making on environmental problems through the use of social intensities of preferences. European Journal of Operational Research. Forthcoming, doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.05.017.