Sex and gender traditionalism among conservative protestants: Does the difference make a difference?

Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion

Volumn 48, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 805-816

  Bartkowski, John P ^a   Hempel, Lynn M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

^b Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 71649089786     PISSN: 00218294     EISSN: 14685906     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5906.2009.01487.x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Acock Alan C. Working with missing values. Journal of Marriage and Family 2005, 67(4):1012-28.
2. Baron Reuben M, Kenny David A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1986, 51(66):1173-82.
3. Bartkowski John P. Remaking the godly marriage: Gender negotiation in evangelical families 2001, New Brunswick, NJ, Rutgers University Press
4. Bartkowski John P, Xu Xiaohe, Ellison Christopher G, Hummer Robert A. Religion and family values reconsidered: Gender traditionalism among conservative Protestants. Religion, Family Life, and Health in the U.S. 2010, In, edited by, New Brunswick, NJ, Rutgers University Press
5. Beauducel Andrthomampersa, Herzberg Phillip Yorck. On the performance of maximum likelihood versus means and variance adjusted weighted least squares estimation in CFA. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 2006, 13(2):186-203.
6. Bollen Kenneth A. Structural equations with latent variables 1989, New York, John Wiley & Sons
7. Bollen Kenneth A, Glanville Jennifer L, Stecklov Guy. Socio-economic status, permanent income, and fertility: A latent-variable approach. Population Studies 2007, 61(1):15-34.
8. Flora David B, Curran Patrick J. An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological Methods 2004, 9(4):466-91.
9. Hempel Lynn, Bartkowski John P. Scripture, sin, and salvation: Theological conservatism reconsidered. Social Forces 2008, 86(4):1647-74.
10. Hoffmann John P, Bartkowski John P. Sex, religious tradition, and biblical literalism. Social Forces 2008, 86(3):1245-72.
11. Holmbeck Grayson N. Toward terminological, conceptual, and statistical clarity in the study of mediators and moderators: Examples from the child-clinical and pediatric psychology literatures. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1997, 65(4):599-610.
12. Hoyle Rick, Smith Gregory T. Formulating clinical research hypotheses as structural equation models. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1994, 62(3):429-40.
13. Muthén Linda K, Muthén Bengt O. Mplus user's guide 1998-2004, 3rd edition, Los Angeles, Muthén and Muthén
14. Peek Charles W, Lowe George D, Williams Susan. Gender and God's word: Another look at religious fundamentalism and sexism. Social Forces 1991, 69(4):1205-21.
15. Steensland Brian, Park Jerry Z, Regnerus Mark D, Robinson Lynn D, Wilcox W Bradford, Woodberry Robert D. The measure of American religion: Toward improving the state of the art. Social Forces 2000, 79(1):291-318.
16. Yu Ching-Yun. Evaluating cutoff criteria of model fit indices for latent variable models with binary and continuous outcomes. 2002, PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles