Affect and acceptance: Examining the effects of positive mood on the technology acceptance model

Decision Support Systems

Volumn 48, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 383-394

  Djamasbi, Soussan ^a   Strong, Diane M ^a   Dishaw, Mark ^b  

^a WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN OSHKOSH   (United States)

Author keywords

Affect; Behavioral intention; Computerized decision aids; Decision support systems; Ease of use; Mood; Positive mood theory; Technology acceptance model; Uncertainty; Usefulness

Indexed keywords

ACCEPTANCE BEHAVIOR; BEHAVIORAL INTENTION; COMPUTERIZED DECISION; EASE OF USE; HALO EFFECT; INDIVIDUAL CHARACTERISTICS; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL; USER BEHAVIORS;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; DECISION THEORY; EXPOSURE CONTROLS; TECHNOLOGY;

MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

EID: 71649087195     PISSN: 01679236     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2009.10.002     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Agarwal R., and Karahanna E. Time flies when you're having fun: cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly 24 4 (2000)
2. Ajzen I., and Fishbein M. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior (1980), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
3. Barclay D., Higgins C., and Thompson R. The partial least squares approach to causal modeling: personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technology Studies 2 2 (1995)
4. Baron R.M., and Kenny D.A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 6 (1986)
5. Barsade S.G., and Gibson D.E. Why does affect matter in organizations?. The Academy of Management Perspectives 21 1 (2007)
6. Brahnam S.D., et al. A gender-based categorization for conflict resolution. Journal of Management Development 24 3 (2005)
7. In: Cameron K.S., Dutton J.E., and Quinn R.E. (Eds). Positive Organizational Scholarship (2003), Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc., San Francisco
8. Campbell D.J. Task Complexity: A Review and Analysis. Academy of Management Review 13 1 (1988)
9. Chin W.W. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In: Marcoulides G.A. (Ed). Modern Methods for Business Research (1998), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah. NJ
10. Clark M.S., and Isen A.M. Toward understanding the relationship between feeling states and social behavior. In: Hastrof A.H., and Isen A.M. (Eds). Cognitive Social Psychology (1982), Elsevier, New York
11. Clark T., Varadarjan P.R., and Pride W.M. Environmental management: the construct and research propositions. Journal of Business Research 29 1 (1994)
12. Clark T.D., Jones M.C., and Armstrong C.P. The dynamic structure of management support systems: theory development, research focus, and direction. MIS Quarterly 31 3 (2007)
13. Cooksey R.W. Judgment Analysis: Theory, Methods, and Applications (1996), Academic Press, New York
14. Cooksey R.W. The methodology of social judgment theory. Thinking and Reasoning 2 3 (1996)
15. Damasio A. Descartes' error: emotion, reason, and the human brain (1994), Putnam, New York
16. Davis F., Bagozzi R.P., and Warshaw P.R. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 35 8 (1989)
17. Davis F.D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13 3 (1989)
18. Davis F.D., and Kottemann J.E. Determinants of decision rule use in a production planning task. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes 63 2 (1995)
19. Dishaw M.T., and Strong D.M. Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs. Information & Management 36 1 (1999)
20. Djamasbi S. Does positive affect influence the effective usage of a decision support system. Decision Support Systems 43 4 (2007)
21. Djamasbi S., and Loiacono E. Do men and women use feedback provided by their Decision Support Systems (DSS) differently. Decision Support Systems 44 4 (2008)
22. Djamasbi S., Fruhling A., and Loiacono E.T. The influence of affect, attitude and usefulness in the acceptance of healthcare information systems. Journal of Information Technology Theory & Application 10 1 (2009)
23. Elsbach K., and Barr P. The effects of mood on individual's use of structured decision protocols. Organization Science 10 2 (1999)
24. Erdfelder E., Faul F., and Buchner A. GPOWER: a general power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 28 (1996)
25. Erez A., and Isen A.M. The influence of positive affect on the components of expectancy motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology 87 6 (2002)
26. Estrada C.A., and Isen A.M. Positive affect facilitates integration of information and decreases anchoring in reasoning among physicians. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes 72 1 (1997)
27. Forgas J.P. Feeling and doing: affective influences on interpersonal behavior. Psychological Inquiry 13 1 (2002)
28. Forgas J.P., and George J.M. Affective influences on judgments and behavior in organizations: an information processing perspective. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes 86 1 (2001)
29. Fornell C., and Larcker D.F. Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement errors. Journal of Marketing Research 18 1 (1981)
30. Fredrickson B.L. Positive emotions and upward spirals in organizations. In: Cameron K.S., Dutton J.E., and Quinn R.E. (Eds). Positive Organizational Scholarship (2003), Berret-Koehler Publishers, Inc., San Francisco
31. Gefen D., and Straub D.W. The relative importance of perceived ease of use in IS adoption: a study of e-commerce adoption. Journal of Association for Information Systems 1 (2000)
32. George J.M. Mood and absence. Journal of Applied Psychology 74 2 (1989)
33. George J.M., and Jones G.R. The experience of work and turnover intentions: interactive effects of value attainment, job satisfaction, and positive mood. Journal of Applied Psychology 81 3 (1996)
34. A. Gopal, R. Bostrom, and W.W. Chin, Applying adaptive structuring theory to investigate the process of group support systems use, Journal of Management Information Systems, 9(3) (92/93).
35. Hammond K.R. Human Judgment and Social Policy: Irreducible Uncertainty, Inevitable Error, Unavoidable Injustice (1996), Oxford University Press, New York, NY
36. Hanoch Y. Neither an angel nor an ant: emotion as an aid to bounded rationality. Journal of Economic Psychology 23 1 (2002)
37. Hartmann F. The effects of tolerance for ambiguity and uncertainty on the appropriateness of accounting performance measures. ABACUS 41 3 (2005)
38. Holt C.C., Modigliani F., and Muth J.F. Derivation of a linear decision rule for production and employment. Management Science 2 2 (1956)
39. Holt C.C., et al. Planning Production, Inventories, and Work Force (1960), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
40. Isen A.M. Positive affect and decision making. In: Lewis M., and Haviland J. (Eds). Handbook of Emotions (1993), The Guilford Press, New York
41. Isen A.M. Positive Affect. In: Dalgleish T., and Power J.M. (Eds). Handbook of Cognition and Emotion (1999), John Wiley & Sons, New York
42. Isen A.M. Positive affect as a source of human strength. In: Aspinwall L., and Staudinger U.M. (Eds). A Psychology of Human Strengths (2003), American Psychological Associations, Washington DC
43. Isen A.M. Some ways in which positive affect influences decision making and problem solving. In: Lewis M. (Ed). Handbook of Emotions (2008), Guilford, Press New, York NY
44. Isen A.M., and Means B. The influence of positive affect on decision-making strategy. Social Cognition 2 (1983)
45. Isen A.M., and Daubman K. The influence of affect on categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47 6 (1984)
46. Isen A.M., and Baron R.A. Positive affect as a factor in organizations. In: Cummings L.L., and Staw B.M. (Eds). Research in Organizational Behavior (1991), JAI Press Inc, Greenwich, Connecticut
47. Isen A.M., and Labroo A.A. Some ways in which positive affect facilitates decision making and judgment. In: Schneider L.S., and Shanteau J. (Eds). Emerging Perspectives on Judgment and Decision Research (2003), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
48. Isen A.M., Daubman K., and Nowicki G. Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52 6 (1987)
49. Isen A.M., Rosenzweig A.S., and Young M.J. The influence of positive affect on clinical problem solving. Medical Decision Making 11 3 (1991)
50. Isen A.M., Niedenthal P.M., and Cantor N. An influence of positive affect on social categorization. Motivation and Emotion 16 1 (1992)
51. Isen A.M., Labroo A.A., and Durlach P. An influence of product and brand name on positive affect: implicit and explicit measures. Motivation and Emotion 28 1 (2004)
52. Isen A.M., et al. The influence of positive affect on the unusualness of word associations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 48 6 (1985)
53. Keil M., Beranek P.M., and Konsynski B.R. Usefulness and ease of use: field study evidence regarding task considerations. Decision Support Systems 13 1 (1995)
54. Kottemann J.E., and Remus W.E. A study of the relationship between decision model naturalness and performance. MIS Quarterly 13 2 (1989)
55. Küller R., et al. The impact of light and colour on psychological mood: a cross-cultural study of indoor work environments. Ergonomics 49 14 (2006)
56. Lee Y., Kozar K.A., and Larsen K.R.T. The technology acceptance model: past, present, and future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 12 (2003)
57. Lim K.H., O'Connor M.J., and Remus W.E. The impact of presentation media on decision making: does multimedia improve the effectiveness of feedback?. Information & Management 42 2 (2005)
58. Malhotra Y., and Galletta D.F. A multidimensional commitment model of volitional systems adoption and usage behavior. Journal of Management Information Systems 22 1 (2005)
59. McCoy S., Galletta D.F., and King W.R. Integrating national culture into IS research: the need for current individual-level measures. Communications of the AIS 15 (2005)
60. McCoy S., Galletta D.F., and King W.R. Applying TAM across cultures: the need for caution. European Journal of Information Systems 16 1 (2007)
61. Mednick S.A. The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review 69 (1962)
62. Muramatsu R., and Hanoch Y. Emotion as a mechanism for bounded rationality agents: the fast and frugal way. Journal of Economic Psychology 26 2 (2005)
63. Murray N., et al. The influence of mood on categorization: a cognitive flexibility interpretation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59 3 (1990)
64. Naylor J.C., and Schenk E.A. The influence of cue redundancy upon the human inference process for tasks of varying degrees of predictability. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance 3 (1968)
65. Pratt M.G., and Ashforth B.E. In: Cameron K.S., Dutton J.E., and Quinn R.E. (Eds). Positive organizational scholarship. Fostering Meaningfulness in Working and at Work (2003), Berret-Koehler, San Francisco
66. Remus W. Will behavioral research on managerial decision making generalize to managers?. Managerial & Decision Economics 17 1 (1996)
67. Remus W.E. An empirical investigation of the impact of graphical and tabular data presentations of decision making. Management Science 30 5 (1984)
68. Remus W.E., and Kottemann J.E. Semi-structured recurring decisions: an experimental study of decision making models and some suggestions for DSS. MIS Quarterly 11 2 (1987)
69. Remus W.E., Carter P.L., and Jenicke L.O. Regression models of decision rules in unstable environments. Business Research 11 2 (1979)
70. Rosenthal R., and Rosnow R. Essentials of Behavioral Research (2008), McGraw Hill, New York, NY
71. Sayegh L., Anthony W.P., and Perrewé P.L. Managerial decision-making under crisis: the role of emotion in an intuitive decision process. Human Resource Management Review 14 2 (2004)
72. Staw B.M., and Barsade S.G. Affect and management performance: a test of sadder-but-wiser vs. happier-and-smarter hypotheses. Administrative Science Quarterly 38 2 (1993)
73. Stewart T.R. Judgment analysis: procedures. In: Brehmer B., and Joyce C.R.B. (Eds). Human Judgment: The Social Judgment Theory View (1988) North-Holland, Amsterdam
74. Stewart T.R. The importance of the task in analyzing expert judgment. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes 69 3 (1997)
75. Stewart T.R., and Lusk C.M. Seven components of judgmental forecasting skill: implications for research and improvements of forecasts. Journal of Forecasting 13 7 (1994)
76. Swieringa R.J., and Weick K.E. An assessment of laboratory experiments in accounting. Journal of Accounting Research 20 (1982)
77. Venkatesh V., and Speier C. Computer technology training in the workplace: a longitudinal investigation of the effect of mood. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 79 1 (1999)
78. Yu-Hui T., Chia-Ping C., and Chia-Ren C. Unmet adoption expectation as the key to e-marketplace failure: a case of Taiwan's steel industry. Industrial Marketing Management 36 8 (2007)