Comments on Coulthard amp; Johnson's (2007) portrayal of the likelihood-ratio framework

Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 155-161

  Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart ^a,b  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Forensic linguistic comparison; Forensic voice comparison; Likelihood ratio framework

Indexed keywords

EID: 71649086927     PISSN: 00450618     EISSN: 1834562X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00450610903147701     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Coulthard M, Johnson A. An introduction to forensic linguistics: Language in evidence. London (UK): Routledge; 2007.
2. Aitken CGG, Taroni F. Statistics and the evaluation of forensic evidence for forensic scientist. 2nd ed. Chichester (UK): Wiley; 2004.
3. Balding DJ. Weight-of-evidence for forensic DNA profiles. Chichester (UK): Wiley; 2005.
4. Champod C, Meuwly D. The inference of identity in forensic speaker recognition. Speech Com. 2000;31:193-203.
5. González-Rodríguez J, Drygajlo A, Ramos-Castro D, García-Gomar M, Ortega-García J. Robust estimation, interpretation and assessment of likelihood ratios in forensic speaker recognition. Comp Speech and Lang. 2006;331-355.
6. Lucy D. Introduction to statistics for forensic scientists. Chichester (UK): Wiley; 2005.
7. Rose P. Forensic speaker identification. London (UK) & New York: Taylor and Francis; 2002.
8. Rose P. Technical forensic speaker recognition. Comp Speech and Lang. 2006;20:159-191.
9. Rose P, Morrison GS. A response to the UK position statement on forensic speaker comparison. Int J of Speech, Lang & the Law. 2009; in press.
10. Lindley DV. Probability and the law. The Statistician. 1977;26:203-220.
11. Donnelly P. Appealing statistics. Significance. 2005;2:46-48.
12. Evett IW. Towards a uniform framework for reporting opinions in forensic science casework. Sci & Just. 1998;38:198-202. (Pubitemid 28367832)
13. Foreman LA, Champod C, Evett IW, Lambert JA, Pope S. Interpreting DNA evidence: A review. Int Stat J. 2003;71:473.
14. National Research Council. Strengthening forensic science in the United States: A path forward. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2009.
15. Ramos D, González-Rodríguez J, González- Domínguez J, Lucena-Molina JJ. Addressing database mismatch in forensic speaker recognition with Ahumada III: A public realcasework database in Spanish. In: [editors unknown] Proceedings of Interspeech 2008 Incorporating SST 2008. Interspeech 2008 Incorporating SST 2008; 2008 Sep 22-26; Brisbane (Australia). [place of publication unknown]: International Speech Communication Association; 2008. p. 1493-1496.