Biased abortion counseling laws and abortion demand

Social Science Journal

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 632-643

  Medoff, Marshall H ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Abortion counseling laws; Abortion demand

Indexed keywords

EID: 71549159145     PISSN: 03623319     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.soscij.2009.05.001     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Adler N.E., David H.P., Major B., Roth S., Russo N.F., and Wyatt G. Psychological responses after abortion. Science 248 (1990) 41-44
2. Adler N.E., David H.P., Major B., Roth S., Russo N.F., and Wyatt G. Psychological factors in abortion: A review. American Psychologist 47 (1992) 1194-1204
3. Alan Guttmacher Institute. State policies in brief (2004), Alan Guttmacher Institute, New York
4. American Psychological Association. (1989). APA research review finds no evidence of 'post-abortion syndrome'. Press Release, January 18, 2007.
5. Bitler M., and Zavodny M. The effect of abortion restrictions on the timing of abortions. Journal of Health Economics 20 (2001) 1011-1032
6. Blank R.M., George C.C., and London R.A. State abortion rates: The impact of policies, providers, politics, demographics, and economic environment. Journal of Health Economics 15 (1996) 513-553
7. Gold R.B., and Nash E. State abortion counseling policies and the fundamental principles of informed consent. Guttmacher Policy Review 10 (2007) 6-13
8. Greene W.H. Econometric analysis (2007), Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey
9. Levine P.B., Trainor A.B., and Zimmerman D.J. The effect of Medicaid abortion funding on abortions, pregnancies and births. Journal of Health Economics 15 (1996) 555-578
10. Matthews S., Ribar D., and Wilhelm M. The effects of economic conditions and access to reproductive health services on state abortion rates and birthrates. Family Planning Perspectives 29 (1997) 52-60
11. Medoff M.H. An economic analysis of the demand for abortions. Economic Inquiry 36 (1988) 353-359
12. Medoff M.H. A pooled time-series analysis of the demand for abortion. Population Research and Policy Review 16 (1997) 597-605
13. Medoff M.H. The response of abortion demand to changes in abortion cost. Social Indicators Research 87 (2008) 329-346
14. Melbye M., Wohifahrt J., Olsen J.H., Frisch M., Westergaard T., Helwig-Larsen K., and Andersen P.K. Induced abortion and the risk of breast cancer. New England Journal of Medicine (1997) 336
15. Michael R.T. Education and the derived demand for children. Journal of Political Economy 81 (1973) 128-164
16. National Cancer Institute, Department of Health and Human Services. Abortion risk of breast cancer associated with abortion (1996), Government Printing Office, Washington, DC
17. Newcomb P.A., Storer B.E., Longnecker M.P., Mittendorf R., Greenberg R.E., and Willett W.C. Pregnancy termination in relation to risk of breast cancer. Journal of the American Medical Association (1996) 275
18. Richardson C.T., and Nash E. Misinformed consent: The medical accuracy of state-developed abortion counseling materials. Guttmacher Policy Review 9 (2006) 6-11
19. Russo N.E., and Zierk K.L. Abortion, childbearing, and women's well-being. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 23 (1992) 269-280
20. Statistical Abstract of the United States. (2003). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
21. Stotland N. The myth of the abortion trauma syndrome. Journal of the American Medical Association 268 (1992) 2078-2079
22. U.S. Bureau of the Census, U.S. Census of the Population. State reports, detailed characteristics, 2000 (2003), U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC
23. Willis R.J. A new approach to the economic theory of fertility behavior. Journal of Political Economy 81 (1973) 14-64