Reflecting on a meta-synthesis of qualitative papers concerned with pregnant women's decision-making about prenatal screening for Down syndrome: A commentary on Reid, Sinclair, Barr, Dobbs and Crealey

Social Science and Medicine

Volumn 69, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 1574-1576

  Heyman, Bob ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HUDDERSFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; DISEASE; PREGNANCY; WOMENS HEALTH;

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; DOWN SYNDROME; HIGH RISK POPULATION; MATERNAL SERUM; NUCHAL TRANSLUCENCY MEASUREMENT; PREGNANT WOMAN; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PRENATAL SCREENING; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

EID: 71549156230     PISSN: 02779536     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.09.011     Document Type: Note

References (4)

1. Hall W., and Callery P. Enhancing the rigor of grounded theory: incorporating reflexivity and relationality. Qualitative Health Research 11 (2001) 257-272
2. Heyman B., Lewando Hundt G., Sandall J., Spencer K., Williams C., Grellier R., et al. On being at higher risk: a qualitative study of prenatal screening for chromosomal anomalies. Social Science & Medicine 62 (2006) 2360-2372
3. Reid B., Sinclair M., Barr O., Dobbs F., and Crealey G. A meta-synthesis of pregnant women's decision-making processes with regard to antenatal screening for Down syndrome. Social Science & Medicine 69 11 (2009) 1561-1573
4. Williams C., Sandall J., Lewando-Hundt G., Heyman B., Spencer K., and Grellier R. Women as moral pioneers? Experiences of first trimester antenatal screening. Social Science & Medicine 61 (2005) 1983-1992