|
Volumn 250, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 961-963
|
Economic benefits of membrane technology vs. evaporator
|
Author keywords
Evaporators; Membranes; Nanofiltration; Reverse osmosis
|
Indexed keywords
CAPITAL AND OPERATING COSTS;
CAPITAL INVESTMENT;
COMPRESSION PROCESS;
ECONOMIC BENEFITS;
EUROPEAN UNION;
FOOD INGREDIENTS;
HIGH-ENERGY INPUT;
LOW ENERGY CONSUMPTION;
MEMBRANE FILTRATION TECHNOLOGY;
MULTI-EFFECT EVAPORATIONS;
PROCESS STEPS;
PRODUCT RECOVERY;
PRODUCTION OPERATIONS;
RENEWABLE SOURCES;
ROTARY VACUUM;
SELECTIVE SEPARATION;
STAND -ALONE;
VAPOUR RECOMPRESSION;
WASTE STREAM;
BEVERAGES;
CENTRIFUGATION;
ECONOMICS;
EVAPORATORS;
FOOD ADDITIVES;
INVESTMENTS;
MICROFILTRATION;
NANOFILTRATION;
NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES;
OPERATING COSTS;
ORGANIC ACIDS;
OSMOSIS MEMBRANES;
POROUS MATERIALS;
REVERSE OSMOSIS;
SPRAY DRYING;
SUGAR (SUCROSE);
TECHNOLOGY;
THERMAL EVAPORATION;
VACUUM EVAPORATION;
VAPORS;
WASTEWATER RECLAMATION;
WATER CONSERVATION;
MEMBRANE TECHNOLOGY;
CENTRIFUGE;
CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION);
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
DEWATERING;
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS;
ENERGY USE;
EUROPEAN UNION;
EVAPORATION;
FILTRATION;
MEMBRANE;
OSMOSIS;
TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT;
WATER TREATMENT;
|
EID: 71549153789
PISSN: 00119164
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2009.09.081 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (33)
|
References (0)
|