Anomaly detection and quality evaluation of Web applications

Handbook of Research on Web Information Systems Quality

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 86-103

  Haydar, May ^a   Malak, Ghazwa ^a   Sahraoui, Houari ^a   Petrenko, Alexandre ^b   Boroday, Sergiy ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b Cent de Recherche Informatique de Montreal   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 71549143107     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-847-5.ch005     Document Type: Chapter

References (41)

1. th International WWW Conference. Honolulu, Hawaii.
2. Baldi, P., Frasconi, P., & Smyth, P. (2003). Modeling the Internet and the Web: Probabilistic methods and algorithms. John Wiley.
3. Basili, V. R., Caldiera, G., & Rombach, H. D. (1994). The goal question metric approach. Encyclopedia of software engineering. Retrieved October 16, 2007, from ftp://ftp.cs.umd.edu/pub/sel/papers/gqm.pdf
4. th International World Wide Web Conference. Honolulu, Hawaii.
5. th Conference on Human Factors and the Web, Madison, Wisconsin.
6. Calero, C., Ruiz, J., & Piattini, M. (2004). A Web metrics survey using WQM. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Engineering, Munich, Germany, (pp. 147-160).
7. Clarke, E. M., Grumberg, O., & Peled, D. A. (2000). Model checking. MIT Press.
8. Conallen, J. (1999). Modeling Web application architectures, with UML. Communications of the ACM, 2(10), 63-70.
9. th International Conference on Computer Aided Verification (Vol. 2102, pp. 337-349). Paris, France: Lecture Notes in Computer Science.
10. De Alfaro, L., Henziger, T. A., & Mang, F. Y. C. (2001b). MCWEB: A model-checking tool for Web site debugging. In Proceedings of the 10th World Wide Web Conference (pp. 86-87). Hong Kong.
11. Dhyani, D., NG, W. K., & Bhowmick, S. S. (2002). A survey of Web metrics. ACM Computing Surveys, 34(4), 469-503.
12. th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, Long Beach, CA, (pp. 400-404).
13. th International Colloquium on Nouvelles Technologies de la Repartition, Gatineau, Quebec, (pp. 163-173).
14. Haydar, M., Petrenko, A., & Sahraoui, H. (2004). Formal verification of Web applications modeled by communicating automata. In Proceedings of the 24th IFIP WG 6.1 IFIP International Conference on Formal Techniques for Networked and Distributed Systems, Madrid, Spain, (Vol. 3235, pp. 115-132).
15. Holzmann, G. J. (2003). The spin model checker, primer and reference manual. Addison-Wesley.
16. IBM (n.d.). Ease of use - e-commerce topics. Retrieved October 16, 2007, from http://www-03.ibm.com/easy/page/611
17. IEEE. (2001). Web publishing guide. Retrieved October 16, 2007, from http://www.ieee.org/web/developers/style/
18. ISO/IEC. (2001). ISO/IEC 9126. (2001). "Software Engineering-Product Quality-Part 1: Quality model"
19. Ivory, M. (2001). An empirical foundation for automated Web interface evaluation. Doctoral dissertation, Berkeley, California: UC Berkeley, Department of Computer Science.
20. Koyani, S. J., Bailey, R. W., & Nall, J. R. (2003). Research-based Web design & usability guidelines. National Institutes of Health.
21. th Annual Conference on uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufman.
22. th International Conference on E-Commerce and Web Technologies, Spain, (LNCS Vol. 3182, pp. 316-327). Springer-Verlag.
23. Naïm, P., Wuillemin, P. H., Leray, P., Pourret, O., & Becker, A. (2004). Réseaux Bayésiens. Eyrolles.
24. Neil, M., Fenton, N. E., & Nielsen, L. (2000). Building large-scale Bayesian Networks. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 15(3), 257-284.
25. Nielsen, J. (2000). Designing Web usability: The practice of simplicity. New Riders Publishing.
26. Offutt, J. (2002). Web software applications quality attributes. Quality engineering in software technology (pp. 187-198). Nuremberg, Germany.
27. Olsina, L. (1998). Web site quality evaluation method: A case study on museums. In Proceedings of the ICSE 99 - 2nd Workshop on Software Engineering over the Internet.
28. OPQUAST: Bonne pratique qualité pour les services en ligne. (n.d.). Retrieved October 16, 2007, from http://www.opquast.com/
29. Orebaugh, A., Morris, G., Warnicke, E., & Ramirez, G. (2004). Ethereal packet sniffing. Syngress Publishing.
30. Pertet, S., & Narasimhan, P. (2005). Causes of failure in Web applications (Tech. Rep. No. CMU-PDL-05-109). Parallel Data Laboratory. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University.
31. Ricca, F., & Tonella, P. (2001). Analysis and testing of Web applications. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering, Toronto, Canada, (pp. 25-34).
32. th Computer Software and Applications Conference (pp. 131-138), Oxford.
33. th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (51-80).
34. SOLEX. (2004). Web application testing with Eclipse. Retrieved October 16, 2007, from http://solex.sourceforge.net/
35. Stotts, P. D., & Cabarrus, C. R. (1998). Hyper-documents as automata: Verification of tracebased browsing properties by model checking. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 16(1), 1-30.
36. th WWW Conference (pp. 182-190). Hawaii, USA.
37. Thomas, S. F. (1981). Possibilistic uncertainty and statistical inference. In Proceedings of the ORSA/TIMS Meeting, Houston, Texas.
38. Tonella, P., & Ricca, F. (2002). Dynamic model extraction and statistical analysis of Web applications. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Web Site Evolution, Montreal, Canada, (pp. 43-52).
39. W3C Recommendation (1999). Web content accessibility guidelines 1.0. Retrieved October 16, 2007, from http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-WEB-CONTENT/
40. Wu, Y., & Offutt, J. (2002). Modeling and testing Web-based applications (Tech. Rep. No. ISE-TR-02-08). GMU ISE Technical.
41. th International Conference on Quality Software (pp. 172-179).