Chapter 19 The Least-Squares Analysis of Data from Binding and Enzyme Kinetics Studies. Weights, Bias, and Confidence Intervals in Usual and Unusual Situations

Methods in Enzymology

Volumn 467, Issue C, 2009, Pages 499-529

  Tellinghuisen, Joel ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA ANALYSIS; ENZYME BINDING; ENZYME KINETICS; FLUORESCENCE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REVIEW; ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MATHEMATICS; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; RESEARCH; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ENZYME;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENZYMES; LEAST-SQUARES ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MONTE CARLO METHOD; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; RESEARCH;

EID: 71549120698     PISSN: 00766879     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S0076-6879(09)67019-1     Document Type: Review

References (58)

1. Askelof P., Korsfeldt M., and Mannervik B. Error structure of enzyme kinetic experiments: Implications for weighting in regression analysis of experimental data. Eur. J. Biochem. 69 (1976) 61-67
2. Barker D.R., and Diana L.M. Simple method for fitting data when both variables have uncertainty. Am. J. Phys. 42 (1974) 224-227
3. Barrow N.J. The description of phosphate adsorption curves. J. Soil Sci. 29 (1978) 447-462
4. Bevington P.R. Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences. (1969), McGraw-Hill, New York
5. Bolster C.H. Revisiting a statistical shortcoming when fitting the Langmuir model to sorption data. J. Environ. Qual. 37 (2008) 1986-1992
6. Bowser M.T., and Chen D.D.Y. Monte Carlo simulation of error propagation in the determination of binding constants from rectangular hyperbolae. 1. Ligand concentration range and binding constant. J. Phys. Chem. A 102 (1998) 8063-8071
7. Bowser M.T., and Chen D.D.Y. Monte Carlo simulation of error propagation in the determination of binding constants from rectangular hyperbolae. 2. Effect of the maximum-response range. J. Phys. Chem. A 103 (1999) 197-202
8. Britt H.I., and Luecke R.H. The estimation of parameters in nonlinear, implicit models. Technometrics 15 (1973) 233-247
9. Cleland W.W. The statistical analysis of enzyme kinetic data. Adv. Enzymol. 29 (1967) 1-32
10. Clutton-Brock M. Likelihood distributions for estimating functions when both variables are subject to error. Technometrics 9 (1967) 261-269
11. Connors K.A. Binding Constants: The Measurement of Molecular Complex Stability (1987), Wiley, New York
12. Cornish-Bowden A., and Eisenthal R. Statistical considerations in the estimation of enzyme kinetic parameters by the direct linear plot and other methods. Biochem. J. 139 (1974) 721-730
13. Davidian M., and Carroll R.J. Variance function estimation. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 82 (1987) 1079-1091
14. de Levie R. Advanced Excel for Scientific Data Analysis (2008), Oxford University Press, New York
15. Deming W.E. Statistical Adjustment of Data (1964), Dover, New York
16. Di Cera E. Use of weighting functions in data fitting. Methods Enzymol. 210 (1992) 68-87
17. Dowd J.E., and Riggs D.S. A comparison of estimates of Michaelis-Menten kinetic constants from various linear transformations. J. Biol. Chem. 240 (1965) 863-869
18. Eftink M.R., and Ghiron C.A. Fluorescence quenching studies with proteins. Anal. Biochem. 114 (1981) 199-227
19. Feldman H.A. Mathematical theory of complex ligand-binding systems at equilibrium: Some methods for parameter fitting. Anal. Biochem. 48 (1972) 317-338
20. Ingle Jr. J.D., and Crouch S.R. Evaluation of precision of quantitative molecular absorption spectrometric measurements. Anal. Chem. 44 (1972) 1375-1386
21. Jacquez J.A., and Norusis M. Sampling experiments on the estimation of parameters in heteroscedastic linear regression. Biometrics 29 (1973) 771-779
22. Jefferys W.H. On the method of least squares. Astron. J. 85 (1980) 177-181
23. Johnson M.L. The analysis of ligand-binding data with experimental uncertainties in independent variables. Anal. Biochem. 148 (1985) 471-478
24. Johnson M.L., and Faunt L.M. Parameter estimation by least-squares methods. Methods Enzymol. 210 (1992) 1-37
25. Kinniburgh D.G. General purpose adsorption isotherms. Environ. Sci. Technol. 20 (1986) 895-904
26. Langmuir I. The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica, and platinum. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 40 (1918) 1361-1403
27. Laws W.R., and Contino P.B. Fluorescence quenching studies: Analysis of nonlinear Stern-Volmer data. Methods Enzymol. 210 (1992) 448-463
28. Lineweaver H., Burk D., and Deming W.E. The dissociation constant of nitrogen-nitrogenase in azotobacter. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 56 (1934) 225-230
29. Lybanon M. A better least-squares method when both variables have uncertainties. Am. J. Phys. 52 (1984) 22-26
30. Mannervik B. Regression Analysis, Experimental error, and statistical criteria in the design and analysis of experiments for discriminating between rival kinetic models. Methods Enzymol. 87 (1982) 370-390
31. Meinert C.L., and McHugh R.B. The biometry of an isotope displacement immunologic microassay. Math. Biosci. 2 (1968) 319-338
32. Munson P.J., and Rodbard D. LIGAND: A versatile computerized approach for characterization of ligand-binding systems. Anal. Biochem. 107 (1980) 220-239
33. Orear J. Least squares when both variables have uncertainties. Am. J. Phys. 50 (1982) 912-916
34. Powell D.R., and Macdonald J.R. A rapidly convergent iterative method for the solution of the generalized nonlinear least squares problem. Computer J. 15 (1972) 148-155
35. Press W.H., Flannery B.P., Teukolsky S.A., and Vetterling W.T. Numerical Recipes (1986), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
36. Ratkowsky D.A. A suitable parameterization of the Michaelis-Menten enzyme reaction. Biochem. J. 240 (1986) 357-360
37. m of Michaelis-Menten kinetics curves. J. Theor. Biol. 178 (1996) 239-254
38. Rodbard D., and Frazier G.R. Statistical analysis of radioligand assay data. Methods Enzymol. 37 (1975) 3-22
39. Schulthess C.P., and Dey D.K. Estimation of Langmuir constants using linear and nonlinear least squares regression analysis. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 60 (1996) 433-442
40. Shukla G.K. Problem of calibration. Technometrics 14 (1972) 547-553
41. Straume M., and Johnson M.L. Analysis of residuals: Criteria for determining goodness of fit. Methods Enzymol. 210 (1992) 87-105
42. Tellinghuisen J. A Monte Carlo study of precision, bias, inconsistency, and non-Gaussian distributions in nonlinear least squares. J. Phys. Chem. A 104 (2000) 2834-2844
43. Tellinghuisen J. Bias and inconsistency in linear regression. J. Phys. Chem. A 104 (2000) 11829-11835
44. Tellinghuisen J. Nonlinear least-squares using microcomputer data analysis programs: KaleidaGraph™ in the physical chemistry teaching laboratory. J. Chem. Educ. 77 (2000) 1233-1239
45. Tellinghuisen J. Statistical error propagation. J. Phys. Chem. A 105 (2001) 3917-3921
46. Tellinghuisen J. Statistical error in isothermal titration calorimetry. Methods Enzymol. 383 (2004) 245-282
47. Tellinghuisen J. Weighted least squares in calibration: What difference does it make?. Analyst 132 (2007) 536-543
48. Tellinghuisen J. Least squares with non-normal data: Estimating experimental variance functions. Analyst 133 (2008) 161-166
49. Tellinghuisen J. Weighted least squares in calibration: The problem with using "quality coefficients" to select weighting formulas. J. Chromatogr. B 872 (2008) 162-166
50. Tellinghuisen J. Least squares in calibration: Weights, nonlinearity, and other nuisances. Methods Enzymol. 454 (2009) 259-285
51. Tellinghuisen J. Variance function estimation by replicate analysis and generalized least squares: A Monte Carlo comparison. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. (2009) doi: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2009.09.001
52. Tellinghuisen J., and Bolster C.H. Weighting formulas for the least-squares analysis of binding phenomena data. J. Phys. Chem. B 113 (2009) 6151-6157
53. Tellinghuisen J., and Bolster C.H. Least-squares analysis of high-replication phosphorus sorption data with weighting from variance function estimation. Environ. Sci. Technol. (2009) unpublished work
54. Thompson M. Variation of precision with concentration in an analytical system. Analyst 113 (1988) 1579-1587
55. Valsami G., Iliadis A., and Macheras P. Non-linear regression analysis with errors in both variables: Estimation of co-operative binding parameters. Biopharm. Drug Dispos. 21 (2000) 7-14
56. Wilkinson G.N. Statistical estimations in enzyme kinetics. Biochem. J. 80 (1961) 324-332
57. Zeng Q.C., Zhang E., and Tellinghuisen J. Univariate calibration by reversed regression of heteroscedastic data: A case study. Analyst 133 (2008) 1649-1655
58. Zeng Q.C., Zhang E., Dong H., and Tellinghuisen J. Weighted least squares in calibration: Estimating data variance functions in high-performance liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 1206 (2008) 147-152