Four tiers

Higher Education

Volumn 58, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 307-320

  Moodie, Gavin ^a  

^a GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Classification; Higher education; Stratification; Tertiary education; Tiers

Indexed keywords

EID: 71449127136     PISSN: 00181560     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10734-008-9195-4     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Association of American Universities. (2008) About AAU. Accessed 6 July 2008, from http://www.aau.edu/.
2. Bleiklie, I. (2005). Organizing higher education in a knowledge society. Higher Education, 49, 31-59. doi: 10. 1007/s10734-004-2913-7.
3. Bourdieu, P. (1973). Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In R. Brown (Ed.), Knowledge, education and cultural change (pp. 71-112). London: Willmer Brothers Limited.
4. Brooks, R. L. (2005). Measuring university quality. Review of Higher Education, 29, 1-21. doi: 10. 1353/rhe. 2005. 0061.
5. Cameron, K. S. (1981). Domains of organizational effectiveness in colleges and universities. Academy of Management Journal, 24(1), 25-47. doi: 10. 2307/255822.
6. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. (2007). The Carnegie classification of institutions of higher education. Accessed 5 July 2008, from http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/classifications/.
7. Center for Science & Technology Studies. (2007). Bibliography of the competence center for scientometrics. Accessed 6 July 2008, from http://www. cest. ch/en/scientometrie/studies. htm.
8. Cyrenne, P., & Grant, H. (2008). University decision making and prestige: An empirical study. Economics of Education Review. doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev. 2008.06.001.
9. Deutscher Akademischer Austausch Dienst (DAAD). (2008). CHE university ranking. Accessed 6 July 2008, from http://www.daad.de/deutschland/hochschulen/hochschulranking/06543.en.html.
10. Federkeil, G. (2002). Some aspects of ranking methodology-the CHE-ranking of German universities. Higher Education in Europe, XXVII(4), 389-397. doi: 10. 1080/0379772022000071878.
11. Gautherin, J. (1993). Marc-Antoine Jullien ('Jullien de Paris') (1775-1848). Prospects: The quarterly review of comparative education, XXIII(3/4), 757-773. Accessed 23 Dec 2007 from http://www.ibe. unesco.org/publications/ThinkersPdf/julliene.PDF.
12. Group of Eight. (2008) Group of Eight. Accessed 6 July 2008, from http://www.go8.edu.au/.
13. Grubb, N. W. (2005). Alternatives to universities revisited, Chap. 1. Education Policy Analysis, 2004, 15-46.
14. Hempel, C. G. (1965). Aspects of scientific explanation and other essays in the philosophy of science. New York: Free Press.
15. Hermanowicz, J. C. (2005). Classifying universities and their departments: A social world perspective. The Journal of Higher Education, 76(1), 26-55. doi: 10. 1353/jhe. 2005. 0005.
16. Hirsch, F. (1976). Social limits to growth. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
17. Johnes, J., & Taylor, J. (1990). Performance indicators in higher education. Society for research into higher education. Bury St Edmunds: St Edmundbury Press. Cited in Stanley and Reynolds (1994).
18. Jullien, M. (1817). Esquisse et vues préliminaires d'un ouvrage sur l'éducation comparée [Outline and preliminary views of a work on comparative education]. Paris: L Colas. Cited in Gautherin, J. (1993: 12 fn 8).
19. Koehl, R. (1977). The comparative study of education: Prescription and practice. Comparative Education Review, 21(2/3), 177-194. doi: 10. 1086/445938.
20. Kogan, M. (1997). Diversification in higher education: Differences and commonalities. Minerva, 35, 47-62. doi: 10. 1023/A: 1004285524614.
21. Labaree, D. F. (2006). Markets, politics, and American higher education: An institutional success story. Accessed 23 Dec 2007, from http://www. stanford. edu/%7Edlabaree/.
22. Lucas, S. R. (2001). Effectively maintained inequality: Education transitions, track mobility and social background effects. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 1642-1690. doi: 10. 1086/321300.
23. Lysons, A. (1990). Dimensions and domains of organisational effectiveness in Australian higher education. Higher Education, 20(3), 287-300. doi: 10. 1007/BF00136231.
24. Lysons, A., & Hatherly, D. (1996). Predicting a taxonomy of organisational effectiveness in U. K. higher educational institutions. Higher Education, 32(1), 23-39. doi: 10. 1007/BF00139216.
25. Lysons, A., Hatherly, D., & Mitchell, D. A. (1998). Comparison of measures of organisational effectiveness in U. K. higher education. Higher Education, 36, 1-19. doi: 10. 1023/A: 1003119709379.
26. Macleans. (2008). Rankings. Accessed 6 July 2008, from http://oncampus. macleans. ca/education/rankings/.
27. Maclennan, A., Musselbrook, K., & Dundas, M. (2000). Credit transfer at the FE/HE interface-research report for the Scottish further education funding council. Edinburgh: Scottish Further Education Funding Council.
28. Marginson, S. (1997a). Competition and contestability in Australian higher education, 1987-1997. Australian Universities'. Review, 40(1), 5-14.
29. Marginson, S. (1997b). Markets in education. St Leonards: Allen & Unwin.
30. Meek, V. L., Goedegebuure, L., Kivinen, O., & Rinne, R. (Eds.). (1996). The mockers and the mocked: Comparative perspectives on differentiation, convergence, and diversity in higher education. New York: Permagon/IAU Press.
31. Moodie, G. (2008). From vocational to higher education: An international perspective. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.
32. Morris, H. (2005). A rank influence. Education Guardian, 9 December. Accessed 16 July 2008, from http://education. guardian.co.uk/higher/comment/story/0,9828,1662118,00.html.
33. Organisation for Economic Co-operation, Development (OECD). (1971). Towards new structures of post-secondary education: A preliminary statement of issues. Paris: OECD.
34. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2007). Education at a glance 2007. Paris: OECD. Accessed 6 July 2008, from http://www.oecd.org/document/30/0,3343,en_2649_37455_39251550_1_1_1_37455,00.html.
35. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2008). Proposed OECD feasibility study for the international assessment of higher education learning outcomes. Accessed 15 July 2008, from http://www. oecd. org/document/22/0, 3343, en_2649_35961291_40624662_1_1_1_1,00.html.
36. Parry, G., & Thompson, A. (2002). Closer by degrees: The past, present and future of higher education in further education colleges. Learning and Skills Development Agency. Accessed 23 Dec 2007, from http://www.lsneducation.org.uk/pubs/Pages/021164.aspx.
37. Ramsden, P. (1999). Predicting institutional research performance from published indicators: A test of a classification of Australian university types. Higher Education, 37, 341-358. doi:10.1023/A:1003692220956.
38. Robbins, L. (1963). Higher education. Report of the committee appointed by the Prime Minister under the chairmanship of Lord Robbins 1961-63. Cmnd. 2154. London: Her Majesty's Stationary Office.
39. Russell Group (2008). The Russell Group. Accessed 6 July 2008, from http://www. russellgroup. ac. uk/home. html.
40. Schriewer, J. (2006). Comparative social science: Characteristic problems and changing problem solutions. Comparative Education, 42(3), 299-336. doi: 10. 1080/03050060601022640.
41. Scott, P. (1995). The meaning of mass higher education. Buckingham: Open University Press.
42. Shanghai Jiao Tong University Institute of Higher Education (2008). Academic ranking of world universities. Accessed 6 July 2008, from http://ed.sjtu.edu.cn/ranking.htm.
43. Shin, J. C. (2008). Classifying higher education institutions in Korea: A performance-based approach. Higher Education. doi: 10.1007/s10734-008-9150-4.
44. Stanley, G., & Reynolds, P. (1994). Similarity grouping of Australian universities. Higher Education, 27(3), 359-366. doi: 10. 1007/BF01432075.
45. Teichler, U. (2008). Diversification? trends and explanations of the shape and size of higher education. Higher Education, 56(3), 349-379. doi: 10. 1007/s10734-008-9122-8.
46. Tight, M. (1996). University typologies re-examined. Higher Education Review, 29(1), 57-77.
47. Times Higher Education (2008). World university rankings. Accessed 16 July 2008, from http://www. timeshighereducation.co.uk/hybrid.asp?typeCode=142& pubCode=1&navcode=118.
48. Times Newspapers Ltd. (2008). Good universities guide. Accessed 6 July 2008, from http://www.timesonline.co.uk/section/0,716,00.html.
49. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO). (1997). International Standard Classification of Education. Accessed 23 Dec 2007, from http://www.unesco.org/education/docs/isced_1997.htm.
50. US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (2000). Higher Education General Information Survey (HEGIS): Fall enrollment in colleges and universities surveys; Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Fall enrollment surveys. Accessed 13 Jan 2002, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2001/digest/dt201.html.
51. US News and World Report (2008). America's best colleges 2008. Accessed 6 July 2008, from http://www. usnews. com/usnews/edu/college/rankings/rankindex_brief. php.
52. Vincent-Lancrin, S. (2004). Building futures scenarios for universities and higher education: An international approach. Policy Futures in Education, 2(2), 245-263. doi: 10. 2304/pfie. 2004. 2. 2. 3.
53. Williams, R., & van Dyke, N. (2007). Measuring the international standing of universities with an application to Australian universities. Higher Education, 53(6), 819-841. doi: 10. 1007/s10734-005-7516-4.
54. Williams, R., & van Dyke, N. (2008). Reputation and reality: Ranking major disciplines in Australian universities. Higher Education, 56(1), 1-28. doi: 10. 1007/s10734-007-9086-0.
55. Yogev, A. (2000). The stratification of Israeli universities: Implications for higher education policy. Higher Education, 40, 183-201. doi: 10. 1023/A: 1004049331498.