Prospective comparison of optic versus blind endoscopic ultrasound in staging esophageal cancer

Surgical Endoscopy

Volumn 23, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 2778-2784

  Twine, Christopher P ^a   Lewis, Wyn G ^a   Escofet, Xavier ^a   Bosanquet, David ^a   Ashley Roberts, S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF WALES   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Endoscopic ultrasonography; Esophageal cancer; Histopathology; Neoplasm staging

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER SCINTISCANNING; CANCER SURGERY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; ESOPHAGUS CANCER; HISTOPATHOLOGIC SKIN REACTION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADULT; AGED; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; ENDOSONOGRAPHY; ESOPHAGEAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOADJUVANT THERAPY; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; NEOPLASM STAGING; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 71449111939     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-009-0491-6     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. S Kelly KM Harris E Berry J Hutton P Roderick J Cullingworth L Gathercole MA Smith 2001 A systematic review of the staging performance of endoscopic ultrasound in gastro-oesophageal carcinoma Gut 49 534 539 10.1136/gut.49.4.534 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MrhtFygtQ%3D%3D 11559651 (Pubitemid 32896984)
2. JY Choi KH Lee YM Shim KS Lee JJ Kim SE Kim BT Kim 2000 Improved detection of individual nodal involvement in squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus by FDG PET J Nucl Med 41 808 815 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3mslWqsQ%3D%3D 10809196
3. JY Choi HJ Jang YM Shim K Kim KS Lee KH Lee Y Choi YS Choe BT Kim 2004 18F-FDG PET in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing curative surgery: prognostic implications J Nucl Med 45 1843 1850 15534053
4. Gore RM, Yaghmai V, Berlin JW, Newmark GM (2004) Oesophageal cancer. Taylor and Francis, London
5. O Vrieze K Haustermans WW De T Lerut CE Van N Ectors M Hiele P Flamen 2004 Is there a role for FGD-PET in radiotherapy planning in esophageal carcinoma? Radiother Oncol 73 269 275 10.1016/j.radonc.2004.10.001 15588870 (Pubitemid 39601073)
6. PR Pfau GG Ginsberg RJ Lew DO Faigel DB Smith ML Kochman 2000 Esophageal dilation for endosonographic evaluation of malignant esophageal strictures is safe and effective Am J Gastroenterol 95 2813 2815 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000. 02309.x 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3crgt12isg%3D%3D 11051353
7. J Vickers D Alderson 1998 Influence of luminal obstruction on oesophageal cancer staging using endoscopic ultrasonography Br J Surg 85 999 1001 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00797.x 1:STN:280:DyaK1czlsFeisw%3D%3D 9692583 (Pubitemid 28341579)
8. Morgan MA, Twine CP, Lewis WG, Lambe R, Oliphant HE, Robinson M, Crosby TD, Roberts SA (2008) Prognostic significance of failure to cross esophageal tumors by endoluminal ultrasound. Dis Esophagus 21(6):508-513
9. SR Weaver GR Blackshaw WG Lewis P Edwards SA Roberts GV Thomas MC Allison 2004 Comparison of special interest computed tomography, endosonography and histopathological stage of oesophageal cancer Clin Radiol 59 499 504 10.1016/j.crad.2003.11.016 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c3ks1Kitw%3D%3D 15145719 (Pubitemid 38735555)
10. MR Stephens WG Lewis AE Brewster I Lord GR Blackshaw I Hodzovic GV Thomas SA Roberts TD Crosby C Gent MC Allison K Shute 2006 Multidisciplinary team management is associated with improved outcomes after surgery for esophageal cancer Dis Esophagus 19 164 171 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2006.00559.x 1:STN:280:DC%2BD283ptlagug%3D%3D 16722993 (Pubitemid 43756663)
11. Sobin LH, Wittekind CH (2002) TNM classification of malignant tumours, 6th edn. Wiley, New York
12. MB Orringer 1984 Transhiatal esophagectomy without thoracotomy for carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus Ann Surg 200 282 288 10.1097/00000658- 198409000-00005 1:STN:280:DyaL2c3nvFWksw%3D%3D 6465981
13. I Lewis 1964 The surgical treatment of carcinoma of the oesophagus, with special reference to a new operation for growths of the middle third Br J Surg 51 53 68 10.1002/bjs.1800510111
14. IC Tanner 1947 The present position of carcinoma of the oesophagus Postgrad Med J 23 109 139 10.1136/pgmj.23.257.109
15. Altman DG (1991) Practical Statistics for Medical Research. Chapman & Hall/CRC, London
16. EL Kaplan P Meier 1958 Non-parametric estimation from incomplete observations J Am Stat Assoc 58 457 481 10.2307/2281868
17. JR Landis GG Koch 1977 The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data Biometrics 33 159 174 10.2307/2529310 1:STN:280: DyaE2s7jsFWqtA%3D%3D 843571
18. BD Beseth R Bedford WH Isacoff EC Holmes RB Cameron 2000 Endoscopic ultrasound does not accurately assess pathologic stage of esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy Am Surg 66 827 831 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3cvktlGitA%3D%3D 10993609
19. I Kalha M Kaw N Fukami M Patel S Singh H Gagneja D Cohen J Morris 2004 The accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound for restaging esophageal carcinoma after chemoradiation therapy Cancer 101 940 947 10.1002/cncr.20429 15329901 (Pubitemid 39100426)
20. MA Morgan WG Lewis TD Crosby X Escofet SA Roberts AE Brewster TJ Harvard GW Clark 2007 Prospective cohort comparison of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus chemotherapy in patients with oesophageal cancer Br J Surg 94 1509 1514 10.1002/bjs.5671 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhtFKhu7s%3D 17902093 (Pubitemid 350275630)
21. MA Morgan WG Lewis AN Hopper X Escofet TJ Havard AE Brewster TD Crosby SA Roberts GW Clark 2007 Prospective comparison of transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy following neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer Dis Esophagus 20 225 231 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2007.00676.x 1:STN:280: DC%2BD2s3pvVSgsw%3D%3D 17509119 (Pubitemid 46831256)
22. AR Davies DA Deans I Penman JN Plevris J Fletcher L Wall H Phillips H Gilmour D Patel BA de S Paterson-Brown 2006 The multidisciplinary team meeting improves staging accuracy and treatment selection for gastro-esophageal cancer Dis Esophagus 19 496 503 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2006.00629.x 1:STN:280: DC%2BD28njsVWqug%3D%3D 17069595 (Pubitemid 44644688)
23. JM Omloo SM Lagarde JB Hulscher JB Reitsma P Fockens DH van FJ Ten Kate H Obertop HW Tilanus JJ van Lanschot 2007 Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the mid/distal esophagus: five-year survival of a randomized clinical trial Ann Surg 246 992 1000 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31815c4037 18043101
24. H Shimada S Okazumi H Matsubara Y Nabeya T Shiratori T Shimizu K Shuto H Hayashi T Ochiai 2006 Impact of the number and extent of positive lymph nodes in 200 patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after three-field lymph node dissection World J Surg 30 1441 1449 10.1007/s00268-005-0462-6 16871357 (Pubitemid 44421246)
25. KF Binmoeller H Seifert U Seitz JR Izbicki M Kida N Soehendra 1995 Ultrasonic esophagoprobe for TNM staging of highly stenosing esophageal carcinoma Gastrointest Endosc 41 547 552 10.1016/S0016-5107(95)70188-5 1:STN:280:DyaK2Mvgt1KltQ%3D%3D 7672546
26. DJ Bowrey GW Clark SA Roberts TS Maughan AB Hawthorne GT Williams PD Carey 1999 Endosonographic staging of 100 consecutive patients with esophageal carcinoma: introduction of the 8-mm esophagoprobe Dis Esophagus 12 258 263 10.1046/j.1442-2050.1999.00071.x 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3jtFWhug%3D%3D 10770359 (Pubitemid 30195423)
27. LB Nesje K Svanes A Viste OD Laerum S Odegaard 2000 Comparison of a linear miniature ultrasound probe and a radial-scanning echoendoscope in TN staging of esophageal cancer Scand J Gastroenterol 35 997 1002 10.1080/003655200750023101 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3crgvFyitA%3D%3D 11063164
28. C Vu S Tsang L Doig J Meenan 2007 The preferred choice for radial endosonographic staging of esophageal cancer: standard echoendoscope or nonoptic esophagoprobe? Surg Endosc 21 1617 1622 10.1007/s00464-007-9206-z 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2srgvFentg%3D%3D 17342557 (Pubitemid 47353494)
29. D Neveu P Aubas F Seguret A Kramar P Dujols 2006 Measuring agreement for ordered ratings in 3 × 3 tables Methods Inf Med 45 541 547 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28nisFGltw%3D%3D 17019509
30. AM Andres PF Marzo 2005 Chance-corrected measures of reliability and validity in K × K tables Stat Methods Med Res 14 473 492 10.1191/0962280205sm412oa 16248349 (Pubitemid 41489521)
31. Valet F, Guinot C, Ezzedine K, Mary JY (2008) Quality assessment of ordinal scale reproducibility: log-linear models provided useful information on scale structure. J Clin Epidemiol In Press
32. F Valet C Guinot JY Mary 2007 Log-linear non-uniform association models for agreement between two ratings on an ordinal scale Stat Med 26 647 662 10.1002/sim.2551 16538701 (Pubitemid 46139544)
33. H Svanholm H Starklint HJ Gundersen J Fabricius H Barlebo S Olsen 1989 Reproducibility of histomorphologic diagnoses with special reference to the kappa statistic APMIS 97 689 698 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1989.tb00464.x 1:STN:280:DyaL1MzltF2rsg%3D%3D 2669853
34. DP Kelsen R Ginsberg TF Pajak DG Sheahan L Gunderson J Mortimer N Estes DG Haller J Ajani W Kocha BD Minsky JA Roth 1998 Chemotherapy followed by surgery compared with surgery alone for localized esophageal cancer N Engl J Med 339 1979 1984 10.1056/NEJM199812313392704 1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FnslCjsg%3D%3D 9869669 (Pubitemid 29024130)
35. Medical Research Council Oesophageal Cancer Working Group 2002 Surgical resection with or without preoperative chemotherapy in oesophageal cancer: a randomised controlled trial Lancet 359 1727 1733 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08651-8 (Pubitemid 34607086)
36. Morgan MA, Lewis WG, Casbard A, Roberts SA, Adams R, Clark GW, Havard TJ, Crosby TD (2009) Stage for stage comparison of definitive chemoradiation, surgery alone and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for oesophageal carcinoma. Br J Surg, in press