The much exaggerated death of positivism

Cultural Studies of Science Education

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 513-528

  Kincheloe, Joe L ^a   Tobin, Kenneth ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Axiology; Empiricism; Epistemology; Hegemony; Ontology; Positivism

Indexed keywords

EID: 71449087305     PISSN: 18711502     EISSN: 18711510     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11422-009-9178-5     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Adorno, T. (1973). Negative dialectics. New York: The Seabury Press.
2. Agrawal, A. (1995). Indigenous and scientific knowledge: Some critical comments. Indigenous Knowledge and Development Monitor, 3(3), 3-6.
3. Allen, M. (2000). Voice of reason. Retrieved December 05, 2007, from http://www.curtin.edu.au/learn/unit/10846/arrow/vorall.htm.
4. Apffel-Marglin, F. (1995). Development or decolonialization in the Andes? Interculture: International Journal of Intercultural and Transdisciplinary Research, 28(1), 3-17.
5. Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
6. Arendt, H. (2004). Philosophy and politics. Social Research, 71, 427-454.
7. Bergson, H. (1910). Time and free will: An essay on the immediate data of consciousness (Trans. F. L. Pogson). London: George Allen and Unwin.
8. Bronowski, J. (1974). Humanism and the growth of knowledge. In P. A. Schilpp (Ed.), The philosophy of Karl Popper (Book 1) (pp. 606-629). La Salle, IL: The Open Court Publishing Co.
9. Clark, C. (2001). Surely teaching hypertext in the composition classroom qualifies as a feminist pedagogy? Retrieved December 05, 2007, from http://english.ttu.edu/kairos/6.2/coverweb/gender/clark/index.htm.
10. Cooper, J. M. (Ed.). (1997). Plato: Complete works. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co.
11. Davies, P. (2007). Taking science on faith. New York Times (Op-Ed, November 24).
12. Deleuze, G. (1993). The fold: Leibniz and the baroque (Trans. T. Conley). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
13. Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition. Trans. P. Patton. New York: Columbia University Press.
14. Elmesky, R., & Tobin, K. (2005). Expanding our understandings of urban science education by expanding the roles of students as researchers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 807-828.
15. Faulconer, J., & Williams, R. (1985). Temporality in human action: An alternative to positivism and historicism. The American Psychologist, 40, 1179-1188.
16. Giroux, H. (1997). Pedagogy and the politics of hope: Theory, culture, and schooling. Boulder, CO: Westview.
17. Gran, G. (1986). Beyond African famines: Whose knowledge matters? Alternatives, 11, 275-296.
18. Grande, S. (2004). Red pedagogy: Native American social and political thought. Boulder, CO: Rowman and Littlefield.
19. Harding, S. (1998). Is science multicultural? Postcolonialisms, feminisms, and epistemologies. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
20. Harding, S. (Ed.). (2004). The feminist standpoint theory reader: Intellectual and political controversies. New York: Routledge.
21. Herrnstein, R., & Murray, C. (1994). The bell curve: Intelligence and class structure in America. New York: The Free Press.
22. Hess, D. (1995). Science and technology in a multicultural world: The cultural politics of facts and artifacts. New York: Columbia University Press.
23. Horkheimer, M. (1974). Critique of instrumental reason. New York: Seabury Press.
24. Huntington, S. (2004). Who are we? The challenge to America's national identity. New York: Simon and Schuster.
25. Kincheloe, J. L. (2008). Knowledge and critical pedagogy: An introduction. Dordrecht: Springer.
26. Laudan, L. (1996). Beyond positivism and relativism: Theory, method and evidence. Boulder: Westview Press.
27. Nelson, L. (2000). Feminist epistemology as and in practice. Newsletter on Feminism and Philosophy, 99 (2). Retrieved December 05, 2007, from http://ww.apa.udel.edu/apa/publications/newsletter//v99n2.
28. Phillips, D. C. (1983). After the wake: Postpositivistic educational thought. Educational Researcher, 12(5), 4-12.
29. Phillips, D. C. (2005). The contested nature of empirical educational research (and why philosophy of education offers little help). Journal of Philosophy of Education, 39, 577-597.
30. Belmont Report. (1979). Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Washington, DC: The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Retrieved December 6, 2007, from http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/belmont.html.
31. Said, E. (1979). Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books.
32. Schutz, A. (1964). Collected papers II: Studies in social theory (A. Brodersen, editor). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
33. Smith, L. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous people. New York: St. Martin's Press, LLC.
34. Steinberg, S., & Kincheloe, J. (Eds.). (2006). What you don't know about schools. New York: Palgrave.
35. Thayer-Bacon, B. (2003). Relational "(e)pistemologies." New York: Peter Lang.
36. Tobin, K., & Kincheloe, J. (Eds.). (2006). Doing educational research: A handbook. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
37. Viergever, M. (1999). Indigenous knowledge: An interpretation of views from indigenous peoples. In L. Semali & J. Kincheloe (Eds.), What is indigenous knowledge? Voices from the academy (pp. 333-359). Bristol, PA: Falmer Press.
38. Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20, 158-177.
39. Weiler, H. (2004). Challenging the orthodoxies of knowledge: Epistemological, structural, and political implications for higher education. Retrieved December 05, 2007, from http://www.stanford.edu/~weiler/unesco_paper_124.pdf.
40. Whitehead, A. (1929/1978). Process and reality. New York: Free Press.