The minimal clinically important difference in the Gastrointestinal Quality-of-Life Index after cholecystectomy

Surgical Endoscopy

Volumn 23, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 2708-2712

  Shi, Hon Yi ^a   Lee, King Teh ^a,b   Lee, Hao Hsien ^c   Uen, Yih Huei ^c   Na, Hsueh Li ^a   Chao, Fang Tse ^a   Chiu, Chong Chi ^c,d,e  

^a KAOHSIUNG MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b KAOHSIUNG MEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^c CHI MEI MEDICAL CENTER   (Taiwan)

^d CHIA NAN UNIVERSITY OF PHARMACY AND SCIENCE   (Taiwan)

^e TAIPEI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Cholecystectomy; Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index; GIQLI; MCID; Minimal clinically important difference

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GASTROINTESTINAL QUALITY OF LIFE INDEX; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STRUCTURED QUESTIONNAIRE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CHOLECYSTECTOMY, LAPAROSCOPIC; EMOTIONS; FEMALE; GASTROINTESTINAL DISEASES; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 71449084502     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-009-0475-6     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. EM Bitzer C Lorenz S Nickel H Dörning A Trojan 2008 Assessing patient-reported outcomes of cholecystectomy in short-stay surgery Surg Endosc 22 2712 2719 10.1007/s00464-008-9878-z 18401650
2. G Borzellino S Sauerland AM Minicozzi G Verlato C Di Pietrantonj G de Manzoni C Cordiano 2008 Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for severe acute cholecystitis: a meta-analysis of results Surg Endosc 22 8 15 10.1007/s00464-007-9511-6 17704863
3. F Keus J de Vries HG Gooszen CJ van Laarhoven 2008 Laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy: health status in a blind randomised trial Surg Endosc 22 1649 1659 10.1007/s00464-007-9675-0 18071815
4. D Revicki RD Hays D Cella J Sloan 2008 Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes J Clin Epidemiol 61 102 109 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007. 03.012 18177782
5. AG Copay BR Subach SD Glassman DW Polly Jr TC Schuler 2007 Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods Spine J 7 541 546 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.01.008 17448732 (Pubitemid 47471437)
6. DE Beaton M Boers GA Wells 2002 Many faces of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID): a literature review and directions for future research Curr Opin Rheumatol 14 109 114 10.1097/00002281-200203000-00006 11845014 (Pubitemid 34185291)
7. RD Crosby RL Kolotkin GR Williams 2003 Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life J Clin Epidemiol 56 395 407 10.1016/S0895-4356(03)00044-1 12812812 (Pubitemid 36694091)
8. SM Yeung AT Shiu CR Martin KM Chu 2006 Translation and validation of the Chinese version of the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index in patients with gastric tumor J Psychosom Res 61 469 477 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2006.03.049 17011354 (Pubitemid 44472524)
9. RD Hays SS Farivar H Liu 2005 Approaches and recommendations for estimating minimally important differences for health-related quality-of-life measures COPD 2 63 67 17136964
10. LE Kazis JJ Anderson RF Meenan 1989 Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status Med Care 27 178 189 10.1097/00005650-198903001-00015
11. JA Sloan D Cella RD Hays 2005 Clinical significance of patient-reported questionnaire data: another step toward consensus J Clin Epidemiol 58 1217 1219 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.07.009 16291464 (Pubitemid 41608536)
12. RD Hays M Brodsky MF Johnston KL Spritzer KK Hui 2005 Evaluating the statistical significance of health-related quality-of-life change in individual patients Eval Health Prof 28 160 171 10.1177/0163278705275339 15851771 (Pubitemid 40628905)
13. JA Husted RJ Cook VT Farewell DD Gladman 2000 Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations J Clin Epidemiol 53 459 468 10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00206-1 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3nsVShuw%3D%3D 10812317 (Pubitemid 30254341)
14. RD Hays JM Woolley 2000 The concept of clinically meaningful difference in health-related quality-of-life research: how meaningful is it? Pharmacoeconomics 18 419 423 10.2165/00019053-200018050-00001 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FpvVWktg%3D%3D 11151395
15. KJ Yost MV Sorensen EA Hahn GA Glendenning A Gnanasakthy D Cella 2005 Using multiple anchor- and distribution-based estimates to evaluate clinically meaningful change on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Biologic Response Modifiers (FACT-BRM) instrument Value Health 8 117 127 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.08202.x 15804320 (Pubitemid 40525373)
16. JM Quintana I Arostegui V Oribe I López de Tejada B Barrios I Garay 2005 Influence of age and gender on quality-of-life outcomes after cholecystectomy Qual Life Res 14 815 825 10.1007/s11136-004-1259-z 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2MzmsFSqtQ%3D%3D 16022074 (Pubitemid 40584811)