Validation of the Turkish version of the foot and ankle outcome score

Rheumatology International

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 169-173

  Göksel Karatepe, Altinay ^a,b   GünaydIn, Rezzan ^a   Kaya, Taciser ^a   KarlIbaş, Uǧur ^a   Özbek, Gülriz ^a  

^a Izmir Ataturk Training and Research Hospital   (Turkey)

^b Izmir Bozyaka Egitim Ve Arastirma Hastanesi   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Ankle; Foot; Outcome assessment; Validation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANKLE; ANKLE FRACTURE; ANKLE INSTABILITY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; CRONBACH ALPHA COEFFICIENT; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISEASE DURATION; FEMALE; FLATFOOT; FOOT; FOOT AND ANKLE OUTCOME SCORE; HALLUX VALGUS; HEEL SPUR; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; METATARSALGIA; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SELECTION; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITY OF LIFE; RELIABILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; SHORT FORM 36; TURKEY (REPUBLIC); VALIDATION THERAPY; VALIDITY;

ADULT; ANKLE JOINT; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; FOOT DEFORMITIES; FOOT DISEASES; HUMANS; JOINT INSTABILITY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TURKEY;

EID: 71349088421     PISSN: 01728172     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00296-009-0929-0     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. GP Bálint J Korda L Hangody, et al. 2003 Foot and ankle disorders Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 17 87 111 10.1016/S1521-6942(02)00103-1 10.1016/S1521-6942(02)00103-1 12659823
2. NM Paige A Nouvong 2006 The top 10 things foot and ankle specialist wish every primary care physician knew Mayo Clin Proc 81 818 822 10.4065/81.6.818 16770982
3. WHO (2001) ICF-international classification of functioning, disability and health. WHO Library, Geneva
4. C Eechaute P Vaes L Van Aerschot, et al. 2007 The clinimetric qualities of patient-assessed instruments for measuring chronic ankle instability: a systematic review BMC Musculoskelet Disord 8 6 10.1186/1471-2474-8-6 10.1186/1471-2474-8-6 17233912 (Pubitemid 46352503)
5. SL Rozzi SM Lephart R Sterner, et al. 1999 Balance training for persons with functionally unstable ankles J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 29 478 486 1:STN:280:DyaK1MzntlOltg%3D%3D 10444738
6. SA Hale J Hertel 2005 Reliability and sensitivity of the foot and ankle disability index in subjects with chronic ankle instability J Athl Train 40 35 40 15902322
7. RL Martin J Irrgang RG Burdett, et al. 2005 Evidence of validity for the foot and ankle ability measure (FAAM) Foot Ankle Int 26 968 982 16309613
8. EM Roos MD Brandsson J Karlsson 2001 Validation of the foot and ankle outcome score Foot Ankle Int 22 788 794 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mrmt1Olsg%3D%3D 11642530
9. EM Roos HP Roos LS Lohmander, et al. 1998 Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS)-development of a self administered outcome measure J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 28 88 96 1:STN:280:DyaK1czmsVeitg%3D%3D 9699158
10. F Atamaz S Hepguler J Oncu 2005 Translation and validation of the Turkish version of the arthritis impact measurement scales 2 in patients with knee osteoarthritis J Rheumatol 32 1331 1336 15996073
11. Kocyigit H, Aydemir O, Fisek G et al (1999) KIsa form 36 (KF-36)'nIn Türkçe versiyonunun güvenilirliǧi ve geçerliliǧi. İlaç ve Tedavi Dergisi 12:102-106
12. RF Meenan JH Mason JJ Anderson, et al. 1992 AIMS2. The content and properties of a revised and expanded arthritis impact measurement scales health status questionnaire Arthritis Rheum 35 1 10 10.1002/art.1780350102 10.1002/art.1780350102 1:STN:280:DyaK387hvVWhtg%3D%3D 1731806
13. JE Ware CD Sherboume 1992 The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). 1. Conceptual-framework and item selection Med Care 30 473 483 10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002 10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002 1593914
14. JP Weir 2005 Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM J Strength Cond Res 19 231 240 10.1519/15184.1 10.1519/15184.1 15705040 (Pubitemid 40417282)
15. HA DeVon ME Block P Moyle-Wright, et al. 2007 A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability J Nurs Scholarsh 39 155 164 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00161.x 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00161.x 17535316
16. Hinkle DE, Wiersma W, Jurs SG (1998) Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences, 5th edn. Houghton Mifflin, Boston
17. CA McHorney AR Tarloy 1995 Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status survey adequate? Qual Life Res 4 293 307 10.1007/BF01593882 10.1007/BF01593882 1:STN:280:DyaK28%2FksFamsw%3D%3D 7550178
18. R Fitzpatrick C Davey MJ Buxton, et al. 1998 Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials Health Technol Assess 2 1-4 1 74 1:STN:280:DyaK1M3gtlOgtA%3D%3D 10103353