The effects of parametric uncertainties in simulations of a reactive plume using a Lagrangian stochastic model

Atmospheric Environment

Volumn 43, Issue 37, 2009, Pages 5978-5988

  Ziehn, Tilo ^a   Dixon, Nick S ^a   Tomlin, Alison S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Global sensitivity analysis; HDMR; High dimensional model representation; Lagrangian structure function coefficient; NO2; Ozone

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL PROCESS; CHEMICAL SPECIES CONCENTRATIONS; GLOBAL SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; HIGH DIMENSIONAL MODEL REPRESENTATION; INPUT PARAMETER; INTERACTIVE EFFECT; LAGRANGIAN STOCHASTIC MODELS; LAGRANGIAN STRUCTURES; LAGRANGIAN VELOCITY; MICRO-MIXING; MIXING TIME; MODEL INPUTS; OZONE CONCENTRATION; PARAMETER INTERACTIONS; PARAMETRIC UNCERTAINTIES; PHOTOLYSIS RATES; PHOTOLYSIS REACTION; RADIAL PROFILES; RATE PARAMETERS; REACTIVE PLUMES; ROOT MEAN SQUARE; SOURCE SIZES; SUBMODELS; TURBULENCE PARAMETERS; TURBULENCE SCALE; TWO SOURCES; WIND TUNNEL EXPERIMENT;

ACTIVATION ENERGY; CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); EXPERIMENTS; LAGRANGE MULTIPLIERS; NITRIC OXIDE; NITROGEN OXIDES; OZONE; PHOTOLYSIS; REACTION RATES; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SIMULATORS; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS; TURBULENCE; WIND TUNNELS;

STOCHASTIC MODELS;

NITROGEN DIOXIDE; NITROGEN OXIDE; OZONE;

ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY; ATMOSPHERIC PLUME; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; LAGRANGIAN ANALYSIS; MIXING; NITROGEN OXIDES; NUMERICAL MODEL; OZONE; PARAMETERIZATION; PHOTOLYSIS; REACTION RATE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STOCHASTICITY; TURBULENCE; TURBULENT FLOW; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; WIND TUNNEL;

AIR QUALITY; ARTICLE; ATMOSPHERIC DISPERSION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXHAUST GAS; PARAMETRIC TEST; PHOTOLYSIS; PLUME DISPERSION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STOCHASTIC MODEL; TEMPERATURE SENSITIVITY; TURBULENT FLOW; URBAN AREA; VELOCITY; WIND;

EID: 71249139507     PISSN: 13522310     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.07.060     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. x species. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 4 (2004) 1461-1738
2. Benson J., Ziehn T., Dixon N.S., and Tomlin A.S. Global sensitivity analysis of a 3D street canyon model - Part II: application and physical insight using sensitivity analysis. Atmospheric Environment 42 (2008) 1874-1891
3. Brown R.J., and Bilger R.W. An experimental study of a reactive plume in grid turbulence. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 312 (1996) 373-407
4. x emissions ratio from road traffic emissions. Atmospheric Environment 39 (2005) 4793-4802
5. Carslaw D.C., Beevers S.D., and Bell M.C. Risks of exceeding the hourly EU limit value for nitrogen dioxide resulting from increased road transport emissions of primary nitrogen dioxide. Atmospheric Environment 41 (2007) 2073-2082
6. Cassiani M., Franzese P., and Giostra U. A PDF micromixing model of dispersion for atmospheric flow. Part I: development of the model, application to homogeneous turbulence and to neutral boundary layer. Atmospheric Environment 39 (2005) 1457-1469
7. Dixon N.S., and Tomlin A.S. A Lagrangian stochastic model for predicting concentration fluctuations in urban areas. Atmospheric Environment 41 (2007) 8114-8127
8. 0) across different kinds of turbulence. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 83 (1997) 207-219
9. Eichhorn, J., 1996. Validation of a microscale pollution dispersal model. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Meeting on Air Modelling and its Application.
10. Fackrell J.E., and Robins A.G. Concentration fluctuations and fluxes in plumes from point sources in a turbulent boundary layer. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 117 (1982) 1-26
11. Garmory A., Richardson E.S., and Mastorakos E. Micromixing effects in a reacting plume by the stochastic fields method. Atmospheric Environment 40 (2006) 1078-1091
12. Li G., Wang S.-W., and Rabitz H. Practical approaches to construct RS-HDMR component functions. Journal of Physical Chemistry A 106 (2002) 8721-8733
13. Li G., Wang S.-W., Rabitz H., Wang S., and Jaffé P. Global uncertainty assessment by high dimensional model representations (HDMR). Chemical Engineering Science 57 (2002) 4445-4460
14. Lien R.-C., and D'Asaro E.A. The Kolmogorov constant for the Lagrangian velocity spectrum and structure function. Physics of Fluids 14 (2002) 4456-4459
15. Middleton D.R., Jones A.R., Redington A.L., Thomson D.J., Sokhi R.S., Luhana L., and Fisher B.E.A. Lagrangian modelling of plume chemistry for secondary pollutants in large industrial plumes. Atmospheric Environment 42 (2008) 415-427
16. Oakley J.E., and O'Hagan A. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis of complex models: a Baysian approach. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 66 (2004) 751-769
17. Pavageau M., and Schatzmann M. Wind tunnel measurements of concentration fluctuations in an urban street canyon. Atmospheric Environment 33 (1999) 3961-3971
18. Rabitz H., Aliş O.F., Shorter J., and Shim K. Efficient input-output model representations. Computer Physics Communications 117 (1999) 11-20
19. Ratto M., Pagano A., and Young P. State dependent parameter metamodelling and sensitivity analysis. Computer Physics and Communications 177 (2007) 863-876
20. 0) across different kinds of turbulence'. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 89 (1998) 161-170
21. 0 by large-eddy simulation. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 120 (2006) 25-37
22. Sandu A., Verwer J.G., Blom J.G., Spee E.J., and Carmichael G.R. Benchmarking stiff ODE solvers for atmospheric chemistry problems II: Rosenbrock solvers. Atmospheric Environment 31 (1997) 3459-3472
23. Sawford B.L. Micro-mixing modelling of scalar fluctuations for plumes in homogeneous turbulence. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion 72 (2004) 133-160
24. 2 photolysis rate coefficient during the Mauna Loa observatory photochemistry experiment. Journal of Geophysical Research 97 (1992) 10349-10359
25. 1D) during Mauna Loa observatory photochemistry experiment 2. Journal of Geophysical Research 101 (1996) 14631-14641
26. Sobol' I.M. On the distribution of points in a cube and the approximate evaluation of integrals. USSR Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics 7 (1976) 86-112
27. Sobol' I.M. Sensitivity analysis for non-linear mathematical models. Mathematical Modeling & Computational Experiment 1 (1993) 407-414
28. Thomson D.J. Criteria for the selection of stochastic models of particle trajectories in turbulent flows. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 180 (1987) 529-556
29. Ziehn T., and Tomlin A.S. Global sensitivity analysis of a 3D street canyon model - Part I: the development of high dimensional model representations. Atmospheric Environment 42 (2008) 1857-1873
30. Ziehn T., and Tomlin A.S. A global sensitivity study of sulphur chemistry in a premixed methane flame model using HDMR. International Journal of Chemical Kinetics 40 11 (2008) 742-753
31. Ziehn T., and Tomlin A.S. GUI-HDMR - a software tool for global sensitivity analysis of complex models. Environmental Modelling & Software 24 (2009) 775-785