Independent factor topic models

Proceedings of the 26th International Conference On Machine Learning, ICML 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 833-840

  Putthividhya, Duangmanee ^a   Attias, Hagai T ^b   Nagarajan, Srikantan ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Golden Metallic Inc   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONDITIONAL INDEPENDENCE ASSUMPTION; LATENT DIRICHLET ALLOCATIONS; LINEAR LATENT VARIABLES; LOG LIKELIHOOD; NEWTON-RAPHSON; OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS; STATISTICAL TOOLS; SYNTHETIC AND REAL DATA; TEXT DOCUMENT; TOPIC MODEL; VARIATIONAL INFERENCE;

INFERENCE ENGINES; ROBOT LEARNING; STATISTICAL MECHANICS;

MODELS;

EID: 71149121872     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (9)

1. Attias, H. (2000). A variational bayesian framework for graphical models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS) (pp. 209-215).
2. Blei, D. M., Griffiths, T., Jordan, M. I., & Tenenbaum, J. (2004). Hierarchical topic models and the nested chinese restaurant process. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS) (pp. 17-24).
3. Blei, D. M., & Lafferty, J. D. (2006). Correlated topic models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS) (pp. 147-154).
4. Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2003). Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 993-1022.
5. Everitt, B. S. (1984). An introduction to latent variable models. London: Chapman and Hall.
6. Girolami, M. (2001). A variational method for learning sparse and overcomplete representations. Neural Computation, 13, 2517-2532.
7. Griffiths, T., & Steyvers, M. (2004). Finding scientific topics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (pp. 5228-5235).
8. Jaakkola, T. S. (1997). Variational methods for inference and estimation in graphical models. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
9. Joreskog, K. G. (1967). Some contributions to maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 32, 443-482.