Do dynamic object process graphs support program understanding? - A controlled experiment

IEEE International Conference on Program Comprehension

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 73-82

  Quante, Jochen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BREMEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARCHITECTURAL INFORMATION; CASE STUDIES; CONTROL FLOWS; CONTROLLED EXPERIMENTS; EXPERIMENTAL SET UPS; INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES; LESSONS LEARNED; PROCESS GRAPHS; PROGRAM ANALYSIS; PROGRAM COMPREHENSION; PROGRAM UNDERSTANDING; RESEARCH QUESTIONS; SINGLE OBJECT;

DATA STRUCTURES; EXPERIMENTS;

GRAPH THEORY;

EID: 71149121761     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICPC.2008.15     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (8)

1. L. B. Christensen. Experimental Methodology. Allyn & Bacon, Boston, USA, 8th edition, 2001.
2. T. A. Corbi. Program understanding: Challenge for the 1990's. IBM Systems Journal, 28(2):294-306, 1989.
3. B. Efron and R. J. Tibshirani. An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman & Hall/CRC, 1998.
4. M. D. Penta, R. E. K. Stirewalt, and E. Kraemer. Designing your next empirical study on program comprehension. In Proc. of 15th ICPC, pages 281-285, 2007.
5. J. Quante. Online construction of dynamic object process graphs. In Proc. of 11th CSMR, pages 113-122, Mar. 2007.
6. J. Quante and R. Koschke. Dynamic object process graphs. In Proc. of 10th CSMR, pages 81-90, 2006.
7. J. Quante and R. Koschke. Dynamic object process graphs. Journal of Systems and Software, 2008. Accepted for publication. doi:10.1016/j.jss. 2007.06.005.
8. M.-A. D. Storey. Theories, methods and tools in program comprehension: Past, present and future. In Proc. of 13th IWPC, pages 181-191, 2005.